HGYN vs KAVL vs TPB Stock Comparison

Hong Yuan Holding, Kaival Brands Innovations and Turning Point Brands Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HGYN Hong Yuan Holding Group
$0.04 -20.0% 1M -20.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.31M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$559.73K
Div. yield
–
Food Distribution Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Turning Point Brands leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Turning Point Brands 6, Hong Yuan Holding 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHGYNKAVLTPBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.31M $468.76K $1.33B TPB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -23.1x 0.0x 29.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 57.6x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.1% -75.3% +24.5% TPB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -17.9% -4,114.5% 8.8% TPB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 9.1% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -20.0% -95.0% -24.1% HGYN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.8%/yr -75.9%/yr +12.4%/yr TPB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 346.6% 355.6% 56.5% TPB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 11/100 6/100 53/100 TPB

Percentile Scorecard

HGYNKAVLTPB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHGYNKAVLTPB
Valuation 3 #39 of 40 0 #38 of 38 32 #26 of 38
Growth 24 #29 of 38 15 #30 of 35 50 #18 of 35
Profitability 11 #32 of 36 0 #36 of 36 89 #5 of 36
Financial Health 5 #38 of 40 8 #36 of 39 79 #9 of 39
Shareholder Returns – – 17 #11 of 13
Overall 11 6 53
  • HGYN ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail
  • KAVL ranked among 40 companies in Tobacco and Cannabis
  • TPB ranked among 40 companies in Tobacco and Cannabis

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHGYNKAVLTPBSPY
1 month -20.0%+50.0%+8.7% -0.2%
3 months +33.3%+50.0%-16.4% +3.9%
6 months -55.6%-25.0%-12.9% +8.2%
Year to date 0.0%-25.0%-37.8% +12.9%
1 year -20.0%-95.0%-24.1% +12.3%
3 years +100.0%-99.6%+239.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +26.0%-83.7%+50.4% +23.3%
5 years -78.9%-99.9%+79.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year -26.8%-75.9%+12.4% +10.9%
10 years ——+446.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+18.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureHGYNKAVLTPBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 346.6%355.6%56.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 534.9%532.6%66.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.610.170.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.06-0.27-0.43 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.7%-100.0%-61.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.3%-95.0%-52.8% -1.2%
52-week high $0.15$0.60$142.98 $779.14
52-week low $0.02$0.01$55.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHGYNKAVLTPB
P/E now vs peer median -29.9xmedian 22.1x 0.0xmedian 16.7x 30.1xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 0.5x 1.7xmedian 0.9x 2.7xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -33.8xmedian 9.7x —median 12.9x —median 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -78.9xmedian 17.5x -0.2xmedian 23.2x 68.9xmedian 23.2x
P/B now vs peer median -13.0xmedian 2.9x -1.9xmedian 1.0x 3.0xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median 1.29median 1.19 0.00median 0.57 0.57median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHGYNKAVLTPB
Revenue $559.73K $278.31K $507.23M
Gross profit $370.82K – $300.08M
Operating income -$91.58K – $75.01M
Net income -$99.38K -$11.45M $59.64M
Free cash flow -$37.82K -$2.07M $19.63M
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $-0.76 $2.21
Cash & equivalents $13.37K $133.22K $270.20M
Total debt – – $1.18B
Shares (diluted) 74.64M 15.14M 20.16M
Enterprise value $2.26M -$1.27M $436.76M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHGYNKAVLTPB
P/E -29.9x 0.0x 30.1x
P/FCF -78.9x -0.2x 68.9x
P/Operating cash flow -78.9x -0.2x 42.0x
P/S 5.3x 1.7x 2.7x
P/B -13.0x -1.9x 3.0x
P/Tangible book -12.3x -1.9x 3.5x
EV/EBITDA -33.8x – –
EV/EBIT -32.5x 0.0x 18.3x
EV/Revenue 5.3x 1.2x 2.7x
EV/FCF -78.6x -0.2x 70.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -78.6x -0.2x 42.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.29 0.00 0.57

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHGYNKAVLTPB
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.1% -75.3% 24.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -71.6% 11.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.9% – 31.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 16.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -268.5% – -15.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -19.6% – 0.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -2,581% -41.3% 23.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -22.9% 0.1% 69.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -362.0% -8.0% -7.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -23.2% -55.8% 52.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 24.4% 26.5% -46.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 7.0% -14.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.4% 26.5% -62.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 7.1% -24.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHGYNKAVLTPB
Gross margin 66.2% – 59.2%
EBITDA margin -15.7% – –
Operating margin -16.4% – 14.8%
Pretax margin -16.4% -4,114% 13.6%
Net margin -17.9% -4,114% 8.8%
FCF margin -6.8% -743.3% 3.9%
Operating cash flow margin -6.8% -743.3% 6.4%
Return on equity – – 14.2%
Return on assets -16.4% -3,174% 7.3%
Return on invested capital – – 9.1%
Return on capital employed – – 10.3%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.8x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 0.2x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 17.7% 1.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHGYNKAVLTPB
Debt / assets – – 34.4%
Debt / equity – – 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – 15.0x
Liabilities / assets 136.2% 182.1% 46.9%
Equity / assets -36.2% -82.1% 53.1%
Interest coverage – -1,106x 2.7x
Current ratio 0.8x 0.5x 5.7x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.5x 3.5x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x 3.1x
Altman Z-score -214.31 -387.86 3.83

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHGYNKAVLTPB
Dividend yield – – 0.5%
Net buyback yield – -298.9% -11.8%
Shareholder yield – -298.9% -11.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 10.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 30.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 15.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 11.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHGYNKAVLTPB
Forward P/E – – 57.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $1.17FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -62.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +59.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $597.82MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +29.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +4.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHGYNKAVLTPB
Held by institutions – – 99.9%
Institutions holding – – 231
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +8.1%
Institutions buying – – 138
Institutions selling – – 66
Buyers to sellers – – 2.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HGYNKAVLTPB
HGYN 1.00 -0.01 -0.03
KAVL -0.01 1.00 -0.10
TPB -0.03 -0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HGYN, KAVL and TPB?

Turning Point Brands (TPB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) $2.31M, Kaival Brands Innovations (KAVL) $468.76K, Turning Point Brands (TPB) $1.33B.

Which company is growing faster?

Turning Point Brands (TPB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) +6.1%, Kaival Brands Innovations (KAVL) -75.3%, Turning Point Brands (TPB) +24.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Turning Point Brands (TPB) has the highest net margin (Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) -17.9%, Kaival Brands Innovations (KAVL) -4,114.5%, Turning Point Brands (TPB) 8.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) returned the most: Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) -20.0%, Kaival Brands Innovations (KAVL) -95.0%, Turning Point Brands (TPB) -24.1%. Over five years, Turning Point Brands (TPB) compounded fastest (Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) -26.8%/yr, Kaival Brands Innovations (KAVL) -75.9%/yr, Turning Point Brands (TPB) +12.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) 0.00%, Turning Point Brands (TPB) 0.00%. Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) and Kaival Brands Innovations (KAVL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Turning Point Brands (TPB) has been the steadiest (Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) 346.6%, Kaival Brands Innovations (KAVL) 355.6%, Turning Point Brands (TPB) 56.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HGYN, KAVL and TPB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Turning Point Brands (TPB) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.