H vs HTHT vs LVS Stock Comparison

Hyatt Hotels, H World and Las Vegas Sands Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
H Hyatt Hotels Corp
$173.27 +7.5% 1M +20.0% 1Y
Market cap
$16.34B
P/E
206.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.15B
Div. yield
0.35%
Hotels Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
HTHT H World Group Ltd
$45.10 +4.2% 1M +17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$13.85B
P/E
19.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.83B
Div. yield
4.81%
Hotels Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp
$36.23 -6.6% 1M -37.7% 1Y
Market cap
$22.72B
P/E
14.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.60B
Div. yield
3.17%
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Las Vegas Sands leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Las Vegas Sands 5, H World 5, Hyatt Hotels 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHHTHTLVSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.34B $13.85B $22.72B LVS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 206.8x 19.1x 14.4x LVS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 47.5x 16.0x 13.9x LVS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.8% +13.2% +10.9% HTHT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.1% 18.9% 11.8% HTHT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -23.6% 42.2% 14.9% HTHT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.7x -1.3x 2.9x HTHT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.35% 4.81% 3.17% HTHT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.0% +17.9% -37.7% H
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.3%/yr -0.5%/yr -1.4%/yr H
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.5% 32.8% 31.4% LVS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 26/100 72/100 81/100 LVS

Percentile Scorecard

HHTHTLVS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHHTHTLVS
Valuation 7 #26 of 28 67 #10 of 28 86 #7 of 44
Growth 33 #17 of 25 88 #4 of 25 81 #9 of 43
Profitability 21 #20 of 25 88 #4 of 25 95 #3 of 42
Financial Health 48 #16 of 30 86 #5 of 30 59 #20 of 47
Shareholder Returns 22 #15 of 19 33 #13 of 19 85 #5 of 28
Overall 26 72 81
  • H ranked among 31 companies in Travel and Lodging
  • HTHT ranked among 31 companies in Travel and Lodging
  • LVS ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHHTHTLVSSPY
1 month +7.5%+4.2%-6.6% +0.9%
3 months -6.7%+4.3%-25.4% +5.9%
6 months +9.0%-13.0%-32.6% +8.5%
Year to date +8.1%-4.1%-44.3% +13.3%
1 year +20.0%+17.9%-37.7% +12.4%
3 years +74.5%+20.4%-23.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year +20.4%+6.4%-8.3% +23.5%
5 years +103.4%-2.7%-6.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year +15.3%-0.5%-1.4% +11.0%
10 years +247.0%+311.1%-37.3% +263.4%
10 years, per year +13.2%+15.2%-4.6% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureHHTHTLVSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.5%32.8%31.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.6%30.0%35.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.970.220.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.580.55-1.20 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.3%-53.9%-52.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.3%-19.6%-47.9% -0.9%
52-week high $202.09$56.06$69.49 $779.14
52-week low $135.42$38.25$35.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHHTHTLVS
P/E now vs peer median 206.8xmedian 18.2x 19.1xmedian 18.2x 14.4xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.5x 3.6xmedian 1.5x 1.7xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -4.0xmedian 14.1x 9.5xmedian 14.1x 8.0xmedian 10.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 64.8xmedian 16.4x 10.1xmedian 16.4x 9.4xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 2.5x 6.6xmedian 2.5x -66.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -4.95median 0.30 0.36median 0.30 0.34median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHHTHTLVS
Revenue $7.15B $3.83B $13.60B
Gross profit $1.45B $1.58B $6.46B
Operating income -$5.27B $1.10B $2.85B
Net income $81.00M $728.00M $1.81B
Free cash flow $252.00M $1.38B $2.41B
R&D – – $180.00M
EPS (diluted) $0.82 $2.23 $2.52
Cash & equivalents $537.00M $2.10B $2.86B
Total debt $19.28B $3.18B $15.44B
Shares (diluted) 96.70M 324.75M 640.00M
Enterprise value $13.82B $5.28B $9.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHHTHTLVS
P/E 206.8x 19.1x 14.4x
P/FCF 64.8x 10.1x 9.4x
P/Operating cash flow 36.9x 10.9x 6.5x
P/S 2.3x 3.6x 1.7x
P/B 4.5x 6.6x -66.0x
P/Tangible book 10.9x 10.0x -66.0x
EV/EBITDA -4.0x 9.5x 8.0x
EV/EBIT -3.8x 11.0x 12.4x
EV/Revenue 2.8x 3.2x 2.6x
EV/FCF 79.4x 8.9x 14.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 45.2x 9.6x 10.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.95 0.36 0.34

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHHTHTLVS
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.8% 13.2% 10.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.2% 15.1% 16.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.1% 26.3% 5.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -5.0% 35.6% 16.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -5.3% 43.8% 5.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -5.9% 47.5% 25.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -81.4% 36.6% 0.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -43.5% 62.7% 39.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -81.9% 34.4% 10.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.8% 53.0% 42.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 47.7% 19.0% 27.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -12.5% 17.1% 18.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 90.9% 16.4% 86.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -19.6% 17.4% 23.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHHTHTLVS
Gross margin 20.3% 41.2% 47.5%
EBITDA margin -69.3% 33.4% 32.4%
Operating margin -73.7% 28.8% 20.9%
Pretax margin 3.2% 27.9% 16.3%
Net margin 1.1% 18.9% 11.8%
FCF margin 3.5% 35.9% 17.7%
Operating cash flow margin 6.2% 33.0% 25.6%
Return on equity 2.3% 39.3% 656.1%
Return on assets 0.6% 7.8% 9.2%
Return on invested capital -23.6% 42.2% 14.9%
Return on capital employed -49.4% 15.4% 18.9%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.4x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.5x 1.7x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% 1.6% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHHTHTLVS
Debt / assets 30.6% 6.6% 79.5%
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.3x -44.9x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.7x -1.3x 2.9x
Debt / FCF 17.0x 0.5x 6.4x
Liabilities / assets 74.1% 77.6% 101.8%
Equity / assets 25.9% 22.4% -1.8%
Interest coverage -17.2x 25.1x 3.8x
Current ratio 0.6x 1.2x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.1x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 1.1x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 0.46 2.07 2.19

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHHTHTLVS
Dividend yield 0.3% 4.8% 3.2%
Net buyback yield 1.8% -2.3% 12.0%
Shareholder yield 2.1% 2.5% 15.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 70.4% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 22.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 0.0% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 52.7% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHHTHTLVS
Forward P/E 47.5xFY2026 16.0xFY2026 13.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.65FY2026 $2.81FY2026 $2.60FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +66.7%FY2026 +26.6%FY2026 -13.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +39.7% +1.8% +10.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.49BFY2026 $3.91BFY2026 $14.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.6%FY2026 +8.0%FY2026 +8.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.6% +4.3% +3.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHHTHTLVS
Held by institutions 100.0% 50.9% 41.0%
Institutions holding 528 255 710
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.2% +8.2% +0.1%
Institutions buying 239 123 331
Institutions selling 178 106 290
Buyers to sellers 1.34 1.16 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HHTHTLVS
H 1.00 0.20 0.28
HTHT 0.20 1.00 0.18
LVS 0.28 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, H, HTHT and LVS?

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Hyatt Hotels (H) $16.34B, H World (HTHT) $13.85B, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) $22.72B.

Which stock is cheaper, H, HTHT and LVS?

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Hyatt Hotels (H) 206.8x, H World (HTHT) 19.1x, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 14.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) is cheapest (Hyatt Hotels (H) 47.5x, H World (HTHT) 16.0x, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 13.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

H World (HTHT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Hyatt Hotels (H) +5.8%, H World (HTHT) +13.2%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) +10.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

H World (HTHT) has the highest net margin (Hyatt Hotels (H) 1.1%, H World (HTHT) 18.9%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 11.8%). On return on invested capital, H World (HTHT) leads (Hyatt Hotels (H) -23.6%, H World (HTHT) 42.2%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 14.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hyatt Hotels (H) returned the most: Hyatt Hotels (H) +20.0%, H World (HTHT) +17.9%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) -37.7%. Over five years, Hyatt Hotels (H) compounded fastest (Hyatt Hotels (H) +15.3%/yr, H World (HTHT) -0.5%/yr, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) -1.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

H World (HTHT) has the highest dividend yield: Hyatt Hotels (H) 0.35%, H World (HTHT) 4.81%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 3.17%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) has been the steadiest (Hyatt Hotels (H) 34.5%, H World (HTHT) 32.8%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 31.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, H, HTHT and LVS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.