GRAB vs LYFT vs WRD Stock Comparison

Grab Holdings, Lyft and WeRide Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.71 -13.4% 1M -53.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.13B
P/E
19.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
4 wins
LYFT Lyft, Inc.
$17.06 +14.8% 1M -16.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.43B
P/E
2.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.77B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
5 wins
WRD WeRide Inc.
$4.18 -24.4% 1M -60.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.34B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$92.10M
Div. yield
–
Autonomous Driving Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lyft leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Lyft 5, Grab Holdings 4, WeRide 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRABLYFTWRDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.13B $6.43B $1.34B GRAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.5x 2.2x -6.0x LYFT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.9x 29.9x — GRAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +21.5% +10.8% +244.8% WRD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.3% 42.3% -243.6% LYFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.5% 0.0% -24.9% GRAB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -6.5x -25.9x — LYFT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.7% -16.7% -60.7% LYFT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.2%/yr -18.3%/yr — LYFT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.7% 48.0% 60.2% GRAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 70/100 70/100 WRD

Percentile Scorecard

GRABLYFTWRD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRABLYFTWRD
Valuation 46 #90 of 167 81 #33 of 167 58 #6 of 13
Growth 80 #32 of 153 89 #18 of 153 91 #2 of 12
Profitability 45 #84 of 153 56 #68 of 153 82 #3 of 12
Financial Health 51 #89 of 179 46 #98 of 179 50 #7 of 13
Shareholder Returns – 80 #20 of 94 –
Overall 56 70 70
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • LYFT ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • WRD ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRABLYFTWRDSPY
1 month -13.4%+14.8%-24.4% -0.8%
3 months -19.1%+13.1%-25.8% +3.5%
6 months -30.3%+17.7%-48.8% +7.0%
Year to date -45.7%-11.9%-51.8% +12.2%
1 year -53.7%-16.7%-60.7% +13.0%
3 years -10.6%+84.2%— +86.3%
3 years, per year -3.7%+22.6%— +23.1%
5 years -79.5%-63.5%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -27.2%-18.3%— +11.0%

Risk

MeasureGRABLYFTWRDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.7%48.0%60.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.5%53.9%63.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.391.392.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.39-0.35-1.01 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.5%-85.8%-89.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -55.7%-30.6%-64.3% -1.8%
52-week high $6.12$24.57$11.72 $779.14
52-week low $2.71$12.65$4.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRABLYFTWRD
P/E now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 17.5x 2.3xmedian 17.5x -5.8x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 1.4x 1.0xmedian 1.4x 14.0xmedian 17.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.5xmedian 14.5x 182.3xmedian 14.5x —
P/FCF now vs peer median 55.7xmedian 12.1x 5.8xmedian 12.1x —median 14.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.7x 2.1xmedian 1.7x 1.4xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.41 0.04median 0.41 —

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRABLYFTWRD
Revenue $3.73B $6.77B $92.10M
Gross profit $1.63B $3.08B $39.20M
Operating income $120.00M -$119.72M -$260.29M
Net income $525.00M $2.87B -$237.93M
Free cash flow $193.00M $1.11B –
R&D $417.00M $472.97M $219.70M
EPS (diluted) $0.14 $7.42 –
Cash & equivalents $2.86B $1.14B $629.27M
Total debt $2.99B $990.56M $194.84M
Shares (diluted) 4.21B 386.33M –
Enterprise value -$3.99B -$916.52M -$1.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRABLYFTWRD
P/E 19.4x 2.3x -5.8x
P/FCF 55.7x 5.8x –
P/Operating cash flow 82.7x 5.4x –
P/S 2.9x 1.0x 14.0x
P/B 1.6x 2.1x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 2.3x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA 26.5x 182.3x –
EV/EBIT 71.9x -47.2x -2.7x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 0.8x 7.5x
EV/FCF 44.7x 5.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow 66.3x 4.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.04 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRABLYFTWRD
Revenue growth (1Y) 21.5% 10.8% 244.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.6% 16.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.6% 20.9% 142.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 69.9% 20.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 340.0% -117.1% -22.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.7% 54.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 837.5% 3,009% 29.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.1% 61.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) 82.0% 3,303% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 60.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -82.1% 14.0% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.4% 98.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -76.7% 12.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 40.6% 72.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRABLYFTWRD
Gross margin 43.6% 45.5% 42.6%
EBITDA margin 8.7% 0.5% –
Operating margin 3.2% -1.8% -282.6%
Pretax margin 13.9% -0.1% -258.0%
Net margin 15.3% 42.3% -243.6%
FCF margin 5.2% 16.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 3.5% 17.6% –
Return on equity 7.9% 94.7% -24.1%
Return on assets 4.2% 31.8% -20.5%
Return on invested capital 1.5% 0.0% -24.9%
Return on capital employed 1.7% -2.9% -26.6%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.8x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 0.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 6.4% 4.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRABLYFTWRD
Debt / assets 15.1% 10.9% 6.3%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.3x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -6.5x -25.9x –
Debt / FCF 10.5x 0.9x –
Liabilities / assets 49.7% 66.8% 17.5%
Equity / assets 50.3% 33.2% 82.5%
Interest coverage 1.1x -5.9x –
Current ratio 1.5x 0.6x 5.4x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.4x 4.0x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.4x 3.7x
Altman Z-score -0.27 -0.06 2.03

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRABLYFTWRD
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 10.7% –
Shareholder yield – 10.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRABLYFTWRD
Forward P/E 16.9xFY2026 29.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.16FY2026 $0.57FY2026 $-0.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +166.7%FY2026 -91.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +12.5% +80.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.07BFY2026 $6.97BFY2026 $149.56MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.9%FY2026 +10.3%FY2026 +52.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +33.7% +11.1% +88.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRABLYFTWRD
Held by institutions 75.6% 100.0% 26.0%
Institutions holding 483 528 110
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +5.2% -1.2%
Institutions buying 231 260 51
Institutions selling 168 175 35
Buyers to sellers 1.38 1.49 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRABLYFTWRD
GRAB 1.00 0.44 0.34
LYFT 0.44 1.00 0.27
WRD 0.34 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRAB, LYFT and WRD?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Grab Holdings (GRAB) $11.13B, Lyft (LYFT) $6.43B, WeRide (WRD) $1.34B.

Which stock is cheaper, GRAB, LYFT and WRD?

Lyft (LYFT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 19.5x, Lyft (LYFT) 2.2x, WeRide (WRD) -6.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grab Holdings (GRAB) is cheapest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 16.9x, Lyft (LYFT) 29.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

WeRide (WRD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%, Lyft (LYFT) +10.8%, WeRide (WRD) +244.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lyft (LYFT) has the highest net margin (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 15.3%, Lyft (LYFT) 42.3%, WeRide (WRD) -243.6%). On return on invested capital, Grab Holdings (GRAB) leads (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 1.5%, Lyft (LYFT) 0.0%, WeRide (WRD) -24.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lyft (LYFT) returned the most: Grab Holdings (GRAB) -53.7%, Lyft (LYFT) -16.7%, WeRide (WRD) -60.7%. Over five years, Lyft (LYFT) compounded fastest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) -27.2%/yr, Lyft (LYFT) -18.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grab Holdings (GRAB) has been the steadiest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 38.7%, Lyft (LYFT) 48.0%, WeRide (WRD) 60.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRAB, LYFT and WRD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lyft (LYFT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.