FRPH vs OPEN vs OZ Stock Comparison

Frp Holdings, Opendoor Technologies and Belpointe PREP Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FRPH Frp Holdings, Inc.
$19.06 -9.6% 1M -22.7% 1Y
Market cap
$361.28M
P/E
265.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$43.62M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
7 wins
OZ Belpointe PREP, LLC
$36.28 -18.1% 1M -42.0% 1Y
Market cap
$138.84M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Frp Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Frp Holdings 7, Opendoor Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFRPHOPENOZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $361.28M $1.86B $138.84M OPEN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 265.5x -1.2x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.1% -37.2% — FRPH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.1% -46.7% — FRPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.9% -20.2% — FRPH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.4x -2.2x — OPEN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -22.7% -71.8% -42.0% FRPH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -7.4%/yr -39.0%/yr -18.4%/yr FRPH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.9% 80.4% 32.6% FRPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 30/100 12/100 — FRPH

Percentile Scorecard

FRPHOPENOZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFRPHOPENOZ
Valuation 24 #30 of 39 3 #38 of 39 –
Growth 13 #29 of 33 19 #27 of 33 –
Profitability 48 #16 of 30 17 #25 of 30 –
Financial Health 35 #25 of 38 22 #30 of 38 –
Shareholder Returns – 0 #14 of 14 –
Overall 30 12 –
  • FRPH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • OPEN ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • OZ ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFRPHOPENOZSPY
1 month -9.6%-23.3%-18.1% -1.0%
3 months -18.6%-48.4%-20.4% +2.9%
6 months -11.7%-64.1%-27.6% +6.4%
Year to date -16.4%-66.0%-44.2% +11.4%
1 year -22.7%-71.8%-42.0% +13.1%
3 years -29.7%-10.0%-48.0% +79.4%
3 years, per year -11.1%-3.5%-19.6% +21.5%
5 years -31.9%-91.5%-63.8% +67.7%
5 years, per year -7.4%-39.0%-18.4% +10.9%
10 years +21.4%—— +255.2%
10 years, per year +2.0%—— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureFRPHOPENOZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.9%80.4%32.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.9%81.3%38.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.263.090.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.88-0.89-1.29 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.2%-97.9%-64.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.4%-78.9%-46.6% -2.5%
52-week high $25.56$9.37$67.99 $779.14
52-week low $18.77$1.95$35.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFRPHOPENOZ
P/E now vs peer median 266.6xmedian 7.8x -1.3xmedian 7.8x —median 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 4.9x 0.6xmedian 4.9x —median 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 11.2x -6.2xmedian 11.2x —median 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 6.4x -4.0xmedian 6.4x —median 6.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.6x 2.1xmedian 0.6x —median 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median -8.20median 0.33 -0.14median 0.33 —median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFRPHOPENOZ
Revenue $43.62M $3.25B –
Gross profit – $281.00M –
Operating income $6.16M -$521.00M –
Net income $1.32M -$1.52B –
Free cash flow – -$474.00M –
R&D – $88.00M –
EPS (diluted) $0.07 $-1.57 –
Cash & equivalents $100.98M $896.00M –
Total debt $214.62M $6.38B –
Shares (diluted) 19.06M 965.78M 3.90M
Enterprise value -$134.34M -$1.96B $138.84M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFRPHOPENOZ
P/E 266.6x -1.3x –
P/FCF – -4.0x –
P/Operating cash flow – -4.2x –
P/S 8.4x 0.6x –
P/B 0.8x 2.1x –
P/Tangible book 0.8x 2.1x –
EV/EBITDA 27.0x -6.2x –
EV/EBIT 77.8x -5.7x –
EV/Revenue 11.0x 0.9x –
EV/FCF – -6.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow – -6.5x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -8.20 -0.14 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFRPHOPENOZ
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.1% -37.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.0% -34.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -32.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 115.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -38.3% -126.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.4% 25.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) -75.5% -398.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -33.9% -2.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) -74.5% -276.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.5% 9.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -187.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -28.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -192.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -28.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFRPHOPENOZ
Gross margin – 8.6% –
EBITDA margin 40.7% -14.8% –
Operating margin 14.1% -16.0% –
Pretax margin 24.5% -46.7% –
Net margin 3.1% -46.7% –
FCF margin – -14.6% –
Operating cash flow margin – -14.1% –
Return on equity 0.2% -162.9% –
Return on assets 0.1% -57.3% –
Return on invested capital 0.9% -20.2% –
Return on capital employed – -30.9% –
Asset turnover 0.1x 1.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 6.3% 11.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFRPHOPENOZ
Debt / assets 28.2% 66.1% –
Debt / equity 0.5x 2.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 6.4x -2.2x –
Debt / FCF – -4.1x –
Liabilities / assets 40.3% 69.1% –
Equity / assets 59.7% 30.9% –
Interest coverage 2.1x -4.6x –
Current ratio – 2.9x –
Quick ratio – 0.9x –
Cash ratio – 0.9x –
Altman Z-score – -0.69 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFRPHOPENOZ
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -12.8% –
Shareholder yield – -12.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFRPHOPENOZ
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.61FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $3.69BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – -15.5%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +102.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFRPHOPENOZ
Held by institutions 47.8% 57.7% 31.8%
Institutions holding 109 393 45
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.0% +18.5% -6.0%
Institutions buying 56 227 8
Institutions selling 30 83 13
Buyers to sellers 1.87 2.73 0.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FRPHOPENOZ
FRPH 1.00 0.18 0.00
OPEN 0.18 1.00 0.02
OZ 0.00 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FRPH, OPEN and OZ?

Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Frp Holdings (FRPH) $361.28M, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) $1.86B, Belpointe PREP (OZ) $138.84M.

Which company is growing faster?

Frp Holdings (FRPH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Frp Holdings (FRPH) +3.1%, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -37.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Frp Holdings (FRPH) has the highest net margin (Frp Holdings (FRPH) 3.1%, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -46.7%). On return on invested capital, Frp Holdings (FRPH) leads (Frp Holdings (FRPH) 0.9%, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -20.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Frp Holdings (FRPH) returned the most: Frp Holdings (FRPH) -22.7%, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -71.8%, Belpointe PREP (OZ) -42.0%. Over five years, Frp Holdings (FRPH) compounded fastest (Frp Holdings (FRPH) -7.4%/yr, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -39.0%/yr, Belpointe PREP (OZ) -18.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Frp Holdings (FRPH) has been the steadiest (Frp Holdings (FRPH) 25.9%, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) 80.4%, Belpointe PREP (OZ) 32.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FRPH, OPEN and OZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Frp Holdings (FRPH) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.