FPH vs STRS vs TRC Stock Comparison

Five Point Holdings, Stratus Properties and Tejon Ranch Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC
$4.16 -12.6% 1M -32.4% 1Y
Market cap
$313.14M
P/E
10.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$118.00M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
2 wins
STRS Stratus Properties Inc
$17.76 -3.2% 1M -13.5% 1Y
Market cap
$140.93M
P/E
6.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.66M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
3 wins
TRC Tejon Ranch Co
$16.26 -1.0% 1M +0.6% 1Y
Market cap
$440.17M
P/E
72.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$56.84M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Tejon Ranch leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Tejon Ranch 6, Stratus Properties 3, Five Point Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFPHSTRSTRCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $313.14M $140.93M $440.17M TRC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.7x 6.6x 72.9x STRS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 3.8x — 95.6x FPH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -39.1% -12.4% +25.4% TRC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 24.9% 75.0% 10.6% STRS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -4.0% 4.4% 0.0% STRS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.7x 1.8x 12.9x FPH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -32.4% -13.5% +0.6% TRC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.1%/yr -12.1%/yr -2.4%/yr TRC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.2% 41.1% 21.4% TRC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 52/100 57/100 TRC

Percentile Scorecard

FPHSTRSTRC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFPHSTRSTRC
Valuation 63 #15 of 39 47 #21 of 39 29 #28 of 39
Growth 28 #24 of 33 41 #20 of 33 69 #11 of 33
Profitability 41 #18 of 30 35 #20 of 30 52 #15 of 30
Financial Health 76 #10 of 38 70 #12 of 38 78 #9 of 38
Shareholder Returns – 69 #5 of 14 –
Overall 52 52 57
  • FPH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • STRS ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • TRC ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFPHSTRSTRCSPY
1 month -12.6%-3.2%-1.0% -0.8%
3 months -22.2%-11.1%-7.7% +3.5%
6 months -16.6%-40.7%-19.3% +7.0%
Year to date -25.6%-26.6%+3.1% +12.2%
1 year -32.4%-13.5%+0.6% +13.0%
3 years +93.5%-29.0%+5.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +24.6%-10.8%+1.9% +23.1%
5 years -44.4%-47.6%-11.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -11.1%-12.1%-2.4% +11.0%
10 years —-26.5%-28.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-3.0%-3.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFPHSTRSTRCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.2%41.1%21.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.2%43.3%20.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.550.350.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.11-0.330.03 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.3%-66.2%-32.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.0%-45.1%-20.6% -1.8%
52-week high $6.30$32.34$20.48 $779.14
52-week low $4.16$17.61$15.58 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFPHSTRSTRC
P/E now vs peer median 10.8xmedian 7.8x 6.6xmedian 7.8x 72.7xmedian 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 4.9x 4.9xmedian 4.9x 7.7xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -5.7xmedian 11.2x 5.6xmedian 11.2x 83.2xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 102.5xmedian 6.4x -4.0xmedian 6.4x -16.9xmedian 6.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.6x 0.4xmedian 0.6x 0.9xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.33median 0.33 -0.18median 0.33 -2.90median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFPHSTRSTRC
Revenue $118.00M $28.66M $56.84M
Gross profit -$10.11M -$9.32M –
Operating income -$131.54M $29.79M -$515.00K
Net income $79.23M $20.07M $6.04M
Free cash flow $6.01M -$35.66M -$26.03M
EPS (diluted) $0.39 $2.67 $0.22
Cash & equivalents $358.72M $73.54M $3.87M
Total debt $444.40M $143.76M $377.27M
Shares (diluted) 76.10M 8.06M 27.07M
Enterprise value -$1.15B -$121.33M $359.79M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFPHSTRSTRC
P/E 10.8x 6.6x 72.7x
P/FCF 102.5x -4.0x -16.9x
P/Operating cash flow 97.0x -4.4x 35.2x
P/S 5.2x 4.9x 7.7x
P/B 0.3x 0.4x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 0.3x 0.4x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA -5.7x 5.6x 83.2x
EV/EBIT -5.3x 7.1x -1,010x
EV/Revenue 5.9x 7.4x 9.1x
EV/FCF 116.7x -5.9x -20.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 110.5x -6.6x 41.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.33 -0.18 -2.90

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFPHSTRSTRC
Revenue growth (1Y) -39.1% -12.4% 25.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.4% -10.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 90.0% -384.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 53.6% -57.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 51.4% 415.7% 94.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 15.7% 58.8% -27.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -67.8% 314.4% 1,237%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.7% -37.3% -24.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -6.4% 491.8% 1,233%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 32.9% -35.7% -25.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -97.0% -23.6% -8.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -50.3% 16.8% 21.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -97.1% 30.6% 55.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -51.2% 30.4% -24.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFPHSTRSTRC
Gross margin -8.6% -32.5% –
EBITDA margin -103.9% 133.0% 11.0%
Operating margin -111.5% 103.9% -0.9%
Pretax margin 79.1% 95.7% 5.1%
Net margin 24.9% 75.0% 10.6%
FCF margin 5.1% -124.4% -45.8%
Operating cash flow margin 5.4% -111.6% 21.9%
Return on equity 3.4% 5.8% 1.2%
Return on assets 2.5% 3.7% 0.9%
Return on invested capital -4.0% 4.4% 0.0%
Return on capital employed – – -0.1%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x -1.6x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue 7.0% 8.2% 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFPHSTRSTRC
Debt / assets 13.8% 27.0% 15.0%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.4x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.7x 1.8x 12.9x
Debt / FCF 73.9x -4.0x -3.7x
Liabilities / assets 27.7% 34.2% 22.9%
Equity / assets 72.3% 65.8% 77.1%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – – 2.9x
Quick ratio – – 1.6x
Cash ratio – – 1.4x
Altman Z-score – – 2.17

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFPHSTRSTRC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 2.3% –
Shareholder yield – 2.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFPHSTRSTRC
Forward P/E 3.8xFY2023 – 95.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.09FY2023 – $0.17FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +1,600.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -136.7% – +147.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $559.28MFY2023 – $57.93MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +16.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -90.5% – +23.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFPHSTRSTRC
Held by institutions 25.2% 49.1% 78.6%
Institutions holding 88 55 127
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% -6.5% +1.3%
Institutions buying 37 26 61
Institutions selling 28 17 30
Buyers to sellers 1.32 1.53 2.03

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FPHSTRSTRC
FPH 1.00 0.10 0.30
STRS 0.10 1.00 0.17
TRC 0.30 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FPH, STRS and TRC?

Tejon Ranch (TRC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Five Point Holdings (FPH) $313.14M, Stratus Properties (STRS) $140.93M, Tejon Ranch (TRC) $440.17M.

Which stock is cheaper, FPH, STRS and TRC?

Stratus Properties (STRS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Five Point Holdings (FPH) 10.7x, Stratus Properties (STRS) 6.6x, Tejon Ranch (TRC) 72.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Five Point Holdings (FPH) is cheapest (Five Point Holdings (FPH) 3.8x, Tejon Ranch (TRC) 95.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tejon Ranch (TRC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Five Point Holdings (FPH) -39.1%, Stratus Properties (STRS) -12.4%, Tejon Ranch (TRC) +25.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Stratus Properties (STRS) has the highest net margin (Five Point Holdings (FPH) 24.9%, Stratus Properties (STRS) 75.0%, Tejon Ranch (TRC) 10.6%). On return on invested capital, Stratus Properties (STRS) leads (Five Point Holdings (FPH) -4.0%, Stratus Properties (STRS) 4.4%, Tejon Ranch (TRC) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tejon Ranch (TRC) returned the most: Five Point Holdings (FPH) -32.4%, Stratus Properties (STRS) -13.5%, Tejon Ranch (TRC) +0.6%. Over five years, Tejon Ranch (TRC) compounded fastest (Five Point Holdings (FPH) -11.1%/yr, Stratus Properties (STRS) -12.1%/yr, Tejon Ranch (TRC) -2.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tejon Ranch (TRC) has been the steadiest (Five Point Holdings (FPH) 29.2%, Stratus Properties (STRS) 41.1%, Tejon Ranch (TRC) 21.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FPH, STRS and TRC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tejon Ranch (TRC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.