FPH vs HHH vs MLP Stock Comparison

Five Point Holdings, Howard Hughes Holdings and Maui Land & Pineapple Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC
$4.22 -11.0% 1M -30.7% 1Y
Market cap
$316.18M
P/E
10.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$118.00M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Five Point Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Five Point Holdings 5, Howard Hughes Holdings 4, Maui Land & Pineapple 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFPHHHHMLPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $316.18M $4.34B $277.80M HHH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.8x 14.9x -60.0x FPH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 3.9x 18.0x — FPH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -39.1% +34.0% -4.1% HHH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 24.9% 12.3% -28.6% FPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -4.0% 4.0% — HHH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.7x 4.0x — FPH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -30.7% -13.7% -9.7% MLP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.9%/yr -4.5%/yr +6.5%/yr MLP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.3% 33.4% 35.4% FPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 64/100 35/100 HHH

Percentile Scorecard

FPHHHHMLP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFPHHHHMLP
Valuation 63 #15 of 39 84 #7 of 39 11 #35 of 39
Growth 28 #24 of 33 75 #9 of 33 47 #18 of 33
Profitability 41 #18 of 30 72 #9 of 30 24 #23 of 30
Financial Health 76 #10 of 38 24 #29 of 38 57 #17 of 38
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 52 64 35
  • FPH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • HHH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • MLP ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFPHHHHMLPSPY
1 month -11.0%+10.1%-12.5% -1.0%
3 months -19.5%+6.6%-17.0% +2.9%
6 months -17.4%+9.6%-8.4% +6.4%
Year to date -24.5%-12.0%-16.0% +11.4%
1 year -30.7%-13.7%-9.7% +13.1%
3 years +77.3%+9.4%-2.8% +79.4%
3 years, per year +21.1%+3.0%-0.9% +21.5%
5 years -46.9%-20.7%+37.0% +67.7%
5 years, per year -11.9%-4.5%+6.5% +10.9%
10 years —-32.0%+112.7% +255.2%
10 years, per year —-3.8%+7.8% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureFPHHHHMLPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.3%33.4%35.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.4%31.5%32.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.530.770.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.05-0.41-0.27 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.8%-49.0%-45.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.0%-21.9%-28.6% -2.5%
52-week high $6.30$89.85$19.92 $779.14
52-week low $4.22$60.20$14.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFPHHHHMLP
P/E now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 7.8x 12.9xmedian 7.8x -61.2xmedian 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 4.9x 1.6xmedian 4.9x 17.5xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -5.8xmedian 11.2x 9.4xmedian 11.2x —median 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 103.9xmedian 6.4x 6.1xmedian 6.4x -34.5xmedian 6.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.6x 0.9xmedian 0.6x 9.1xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.33median 0.33 0.47median 0.33 -2.47median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFPHHHHMLP
Revenue $118.00M $2.37B $16.15M
Gross profit -$10.11M $1.79B $9.37M
Operating income -$131.54M $505.99M -$5.87M
Net income $79.23M $290.16M -$5.87M
Free cash flow $6.01M $628.36M -$8.19M
EPS (diluted) $0.39 $4.94 $-0.23
Cash & equivalents $358.72M $2.65B $3.28M
Total debt $1.78B $5.46B $25.00M
Shares (diluted) 76.10M 59.15M 20.40M
Enterprise value -$1.15B -$3.09B $260.34M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFPHHHHMLP
P/E 10.9x 12.9x -61.2x
P/FCF 103.9x 6.1x -34.5x
P/Operating cash flow 98.4x 4.8x 794.5x
P/S 5.3x 1.6x 17.5x
P/B 0.3x 0.9x 9.1x
P/Tangible book 0.3x 1.1x 9.1x
EV/EBITDA -5.8x 9.4x –
EV/EBIT -5.4x 13.0x -49.1x
EV/Revenue 6.0x 2.8x 17.8x
EV/FCF 118.2x 10.5x -35.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 111.9x 8.4x 809.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.33 0.47 -2.47

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFPHHHHMLP
Revenue growth (1Y) -39.1% 34.0% -4.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.4% 20.1% 19.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 90.0% 67.9% 17.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 53.6% 31.7% 9.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 51.4% -11.9% 10.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 15.7% 8.1% -21.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -67.8% 27.3% 10.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 34.5% 18.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -6.4% 20.1% 67.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 32.9% 27.2% 24.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -97.0% 33.7% 78.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -50.3% – 27.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -97.1% 120.5% -94.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -51.2% – -9.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFPHHHHMLP
Gross margin -8.6% 75.6% 58.0%
EBITDA margin -103.9% 29.4% –
Operating margin -111.5% 21.3% -36.3%
Pretax margin 79.1% 16.0% -36.3%
Net margin 24.9% 12.3% -28.6%
FCF margin 5.1% 26.5% -50.7%
Operating cash flow margin 5.4% 33.2% 2.2%
Return on equity 3.4% 7.4% -18.6%
Return on assets 2.5% 2.1% -12.0%
Return on invested capital -4.0% 4.0% –
Return on capital employed – – -13.9%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 2.7x -0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 7.0% 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFPHHHHMLP
Debt / assets 13.8% 34.3% 17.1%
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.4x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.7x 4.0x –
Debt / FCF 73.9x 8.7x -1.0x
Liabilities / assets 27.7% 74.6% 37.4%
Equity / assets 72.3% 25.4% 62.6%
Interest coverage – 2.9x –
Current ratio – – 1.2x
Quick ratio – – 0.8x
Cash ratio – – 0.5x
Altman Z-score – – 6.98

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFPHHHHMLP
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFPHHHHMLP
Forward P/E 3.9xFY2023 18.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.09FY2023 $3.55FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +60.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -37.6% -14.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $559.28MFY2023 $2.40BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +63.2%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -42.5% -8.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFPHHHHMLP
Held by institutions 25.2% 90.7% 23.5%
Institutions holding 88 303 66
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% +1.8% +28.9%
Institutions buying 37 170 23
Institutions selling 28 87 26
Buyers to sellers 1.32 1.95 0.88

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FPHHHHMLP
FPH 1.00 0.42 0.28
HHH 0.42 1.00 0.17
MLP 0.28 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FPH, HHH and MLP?

Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Five Point Holdings (FPH) $316.18M, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) $4.34B, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) $277.80M.

Which stock is cheaper, FPH, HHH and MLP?

Five Point Holdings (FPH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Five Point Holdings (FPH) 10.8x, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 14.9x, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) -60.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Five Point Holdings (FPH) is cheapest (Five Point Holdings (FPH) 3.9x, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 18.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Five Point Holdings (FPH) -39.1%, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) +34.0%, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) -4.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Five Point Holdings (FPH) has the highest net margin (Five Point Holdings (FPH) 24.9%, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 12.3%, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) -28.6%). On return on invested capital, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) leads (Five Point Holdings (FPH) -4.0%, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 4.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) returned the most: Five Point Holdings (FPH) -30.7%, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) -13.7%, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) -9.7%. Over five years, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) compounded fastest (Five Point Holdings (FPH) -11.9%/yr, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) -4.5%/yr, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) +6.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Five Point Holdings (FPH) has been the steadiest (Five Point Holdings (FPH) 29.3%, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 33.4%, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) 35.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FPH, HHH and MLP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Five Point Holdings (FPH) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.