FORTY vs GWRE vs VRSK Stock Comparison

Formula Systems (1985), Guidewire Software and Verisk Analytics Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc.
$197.85 +21.2% 1M -10.1% 1Y
Market cap
$27.48B
P/E
31.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.14B
Div. yield
–
Financial Data and Analytics Financial Services
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Verisk Analytics leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Verisk Analytics 6, Formula Systems (1985) 3, Guidewire Software 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFORTYGWREVRSKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.69B $14.07B $27.48B VRSK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 2.7x 101.0x 31.0x FORTY
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 41.6x 24.8x VRSK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.8% +22.7% +5.0% FORTY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.6% 9.4% 28.2% VRSK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.1% 6.6% 31.9% VRSK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.4x 2.3x GWRE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -14.9% -23.4% -10.1% VRSK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.3%/yr +6.3%/yr -1.6%/yr GWRE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.2% 62.9% 35.7% VRSK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 86/100 68/100 55/100 FORTY

Percentile Scorecard

FORTYGWREVRSK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFORTYGWREVRSK
Valuation 98 #2 of 52 39 #61 of 99 29 #684 of 963
Growth 89 #6 of 46 89 #11 of 94 44 #460 of 823
Profitability 83 #8 of 42 79 #20 of 90 97 #30 of 845
Financial Health 60 #25 of 61 76 #26 of 105 31 #617 of 896
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 30 57 #28 of 63 72 #206 of 731
Overall 86 68 55
  • FORTY ranked among 65 companies in Technology Services
  • GWRE ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • VRSK ranked among 1,001 companies in Financial Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFORTYGWREVRSKSPY
1 month +5.0%+4.6%+21.2% -1.0%
3 months +9.6%+6.4%+4.8% -0.4%
6 months -16.1%+30.2%+15.7% +4.5%
Year to date -28.6%-15.1%-11.6% +12.4%
1 year -14.9%-23.4%-10.1% +13.6%
3 years +89.2%+86.6%-14.2% +76.4%
3 years, per year +23.7%+23.1%-5.0% +20.8%
5 years +6.9%+35.8%-7.8% +63.7%
5 years, per year +1.3%+6.3%-1.6% +10.4%
10 years +211.3%+200.4%+142.0% +267.7%
10 years, per year +12.0%+11.6%+9.2% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureFORTYGWREVRSKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.2%62.9%35.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 83.6%64.6%36.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.590.67-0.46 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.27-0.37-0.28 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -55.5%-60.8%-51.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.4%-23.4%-12.1% -1.6%
52-week high $190.56$222.78$225.07 $779.14
52-week low $102.01$102.69$156.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFORTYGWREVRSK
P/E now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 18.7x 103.2xmedian 21.9x 29.2xmedian 13.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.7x 9.5xmedian 2.3x 8.2xmedian 3.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.5x 65.4xmedian 16.4x 17.2xmedian 6.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 13.1x 37.1xmedian 17.4x 20.8xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.4x 11.7xmedian 1.7x -21.7xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 1.35 2.18median 0.91 1.17median 0.95

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFORTYGWREVRSK
Revenue $2.93B $1.48B $3.14B
Gross profit $580.29M $947.37M $2.20B
Operating income $249.80M $149.87M $1.38B
Net income $697.91M $139.28M $885.50M
Free cash flow – $377.66M $1.24B
R&D $21.15M $340.10M –
EPS (diluted) $39.97 $1.63 $6.77
Cash & equivalents $863.79M $372.89M $551.40M
Total debt $168.15M $678.09M $4.47B
Shares (diluted) 15.79M 85.41M 130.85M
Enterprise value -$1.66B $10.64B $22.12B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFORTYGWREVRSK
P/E 2.9x 103.2x 29.2x
P/FCF – 37.1x 20.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 35.9x 17.1x
P/S 0.6x 9.5x 8.2x
P/B 1.1x 11.7x -21.7x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 11.9x -17.1x
EV/EBITDA – 65.4x 17.2x
EV/EBIT 4.5x 92.9x 21.6x
EV/Revenue 0.4x 9.4x 9.5x
EV/FCF – 36.9x 24.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – 35.7x 19.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 2.18 1.17

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFORTYGWREVRSK
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.8% 22.7% 5.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.9% 17.7% 6.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 22.3% 26.0% 6.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.2% 27.4% 8.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 26.5% 264.9% 4.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 1.6% 44.3% 6.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 255.1% 99.5% -3.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 61.1% 48.1% 20.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 700.9% 100.7% 3.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 112.1% 47.3% 25.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 29.5% 21.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 116.5% 11.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 28.0% 21.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 126.3% 14.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFORTYGWREVRSK
Gross margin 19.8% 64.2% 70.2%
EBITDA margin – 14.4% 55.0%
Operating margin 8.5% 10.2% 43.9%
Pretax margin 7.1% 11.1% 37.0%
Net margin 21.6% 9.4% 28.2%
FCF margin – 25.6% 39.4%
Operating cash flow margin – 26.4% 47.9%
Return on equity 40.1% 11.1% –
Return on assets 19.5% 5.4% 19.5%
Return on invested capital 10.1% 6.6% 31.9%
Return on capital employed 11.2% 7.9% 40.1%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.8x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 12.3% 1.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFORTYGWREVRSK
Debt / assets 4.8% 26.3% 99.5%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.6x -3.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.4x 2.3x
Debt / FCF – 1.8x 3.6x
Liabilities / assets 52.8% 53.7% 126.4%
Equity / assets 47.2% 46.3% -26.4%
Interest coverage – 11.2x 7.0x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.8x 1.0x
Quick ratio 1.4x 1.6x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.6x 1.1x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – 6.52 6.96

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFORTYGWREVRSK
Dividend yield 12.7% – 1.0%
Net buyback yield – 3.1% 7.3%
Shareholder yield 12.7% 3.1% 8.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFORTYGWREVRSK
Forward P/E – 41.6xFY2027 24.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.10FY2027 $7.97FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +19.5%FY2027 +11.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +34.9% +5.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.61BFY2027 $3.33BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +8.5%FY2027 +8.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +30.2% +6.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFORTYGWREVRSK
Held by institutions – 99.3% 97.6%
Institutions holding – 548 955
Change in shares held, QoQ – -1.0% -0.4%
Institutions buying – 249 489
Institutions selling – 227 349
Buyers to sellers – 1.10 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FORTYGWREVRSK
FORTY 1.00 0.10 0.06
GWRE 0.10 1.00 0.53
VRSK 0.06 0.53 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FORTY, GWRE and VRSK?

Verisk Analytics (VRSK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) $1.69B, Guidewire Software (GWRE) $14.07B, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) $27.48B.

Which stock is cheaper, FORTY, GWRE and VRSK?

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 2.7x, Guidewire Software (GWRE) 101.0x, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 31.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) is cheapest (Guidewire Software (GWRE) 41.6x, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 24.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) +24.8%, Guidewire Software (GWRE) +22.7%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) +5.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Verisk Analytics (VRSK) has the highest net margin (Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 21.6%, Guidewire Software (GWRE) 9.4%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 28.2%). On return on invested capital, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) leads (Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 10.1%, Guidewire Software (GWRE) 6.6%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 31.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Verisk Analytics (VRSK) returned the most: Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) -14.9%, Guidewire Software (GWRE) -23.4%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) -10.1%. Over five years, Guidewire Software (GWRE) compounded fastest (Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) +1.3%/yr, Guidewire Software (GWRE) +6.3%/yr, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) -1.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) has been the steadiest (Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 55.2%, Guidewire Software (GWRE) 62.9%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 35.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FORTY, GWRE and VRSK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.