ET vs FNV vs KMI Stock Comparison

Energy Transfer, Franco Nevada and Kinder Morgan Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ET Energy Transfer LP
$20.61 +2.0% 1M +23.2% 1Y
Market cap
$70.32B
P/E
13.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.38B
Div. yield
0.07%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
7 wins
FNV FRANCO NEVADA Corp
$230.76 -10.4% 1M +21.4% 1Y
Market cap
$45.55B
P/E
31.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.32B
Div. yield
0.01%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
3 wins
KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc.
$33.94 +10.4% 1M +31.2% 1Y
Market cap
$75.50B
P/E
21.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.34B
Div. yield
0.03%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Energy Transfer leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Energy Transfer 7, Franco Nevada 3, Kinder Morgan 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionETFNVKMILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $70.32B $45.55B $75.50B KMI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.9x 31.3x 21.0x ET
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.5x 29.5x 20.8x ET
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.3% +73.6% +11.7% FNV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.7% 62.8% 19.6% FNV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.4% — 6.3% ET
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.0x — 4.1x ET
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.07% 0.01% 0.03% ET
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +23.2% +21.4% +31.2% KMI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.2%/yr +10.1%/yr +14.4%/yr ET
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 17.5% 38.9% 21.2% ET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 81/100 44/100 FNV

Percentile Scorecard

ETFNVKMI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisETFNVKMI
Valuation 94 #3 of 35 57 #79 of 184 32 #24 of 35
Growth 61 #14 of 34 91 #11 of 113 67 #12 of 34
Profitability 30 #24 of 34 99 #2 of 130 52 #17 of 34
Financial Health 59 #15 of 35 98 #5 of 167 47 #19 of 35
Shareholder Returns 70 #10 of 31 57 #33 of 76 23 #24 of 31
Overall 63 81 44
  • ET ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • FNV ranked among 212 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • KMI ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodETFNVKMISPY
1 month +2.0%-10.4%+10.4% -0.8%
3 months +3.5%+7.6%+6.9% +3.5%
6 months +8.2%-4.3%+9.7% +7.0%
Year to date +25.0%+11.3%+23.5% +12.2%
1 year +23.2%+21.4%+31.2% +13.0%
3 years +57.2%+67.9%+107.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +16.3%+18.9%+27.5% +23.1%
5 years +111.8%+61.4%+96.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year +16.2%+10.1%+14.4% +11.0%
10 years +30.9%+262.9%+57.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year +2.7%+13.8%+4.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureETFNVKMISPY
Volatility, 1Y 17.5%38.9%21.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 16.6%42.2%20.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.211.26-0.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.330.551.47 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -25.8%-38.2%-20.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.2%-17.8%-1.5% -1.8%
52-week high $21.74$280.82$34.44 $779.14
52-week low $16.21$183.97$25.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleETFNVKMI
P/E now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 21.0x 30.6xmedian 33.6x 21.0xmedian 21.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.7x 19.2xmedian 4.9x 4.1xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 11.0x 20.2xmedian 11.5x 13.8xmedian 11.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.6xmedian 16.6x 25.1xmedian 13.2x 24.5xmedian 16.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 2.6x 5.4xmedian 1.8x 2.3xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median 2.01median 1.92 1.02median 0.91 1.55median 1.92

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsETFNVKMI
Revenue $107.38B $2.32B $18.34B
Gross profit $25.32B $1.79B $12.18B
Operating income $10.78B $1.82B $5.31B
Net income $7.04B $1.48B $3.71B
Free cash flow $5.22B $1.77B $3.08B
EPS (diluted) $1.46 $7.54 $1.62
Cash & equivalents $1.02B $1.01B $918.00M
Total debt $68.41B – $33.07B
Shares (diluted) 3.46B 193.00M 2.23B
Enterprise value $63.51B $42.92B $74.35B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricETFNVKMI
P/E 14.1x 30.6x 21.0x
P/FCF 13.6x 25.1x 24.5x
P/Operating cash flow 5.9x 25.0x 11.2x
P/S 0.7x 19.2x 4.1x
P/B 1.4x 5.4x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 5.4x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA 8.2x 20.2x 13.8x
EV/EBIT 12.8x 23.9x 20.3x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 18.8x 5.9x
EV/FCF 26.5x 24.6x 35.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.4x 24.5x 16.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.01 1.02 1.55

Growth

14 metrics
MetricETFNVKMI
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.3% 73.6% 11.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.0% 23.5% 4.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.9% 88.6% 9.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 32.0% 5.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 16.5% 89.7% 18.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 34.4% 7.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 16.1% 88.3% 30.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 30.6% 13.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.6% 87.7% 31.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.0% 29.9% 13.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 8.8% 53.7% 17.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.9% 20.0% 6.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -8.5% 83.9% 11.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.3% 19.8% -3.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricETFNVKMI
Gross margin 23.6% 77.3% 66.4%
EBITDA margin 15.7% 93.0% 42.6%
Operating margin 10.0% 78.5% 29.0%
Pretax margin 7.1% 85.0% 25.8%
Net margin 4.7% 62.8% 19.6%
FCF margin 4.9% 76.4% 16.8%
Operating cash flow margin 11.3% 76.7% 36.7%
Return on equity 14.0% 18.1% 11.3%
Return on assets 4.8% 16.7% 5.0%
Return on invested capital 8.4% – 6.3%
Return on capital employed 8.4% 20.9% 7.6%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.3x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.2x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricETFNVKMI
Debt / assets 46.2% – 43.9%
Debt / equity 1.4x – 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.0x – 4.1x
Debt / FCF 13.1x – 10.7x
Liabilities / assets 65.9% 7.6% 56.5%
Equity / assets 34.1% 92.4% 43.5%
Interest coverage 2.9x 1,070x –
Current ratio 1.2x 9.4x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.9x 8.5x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x 6.9x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 40.59 1.34

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricETFNVKMI
Dividend yield 6.5% 0.7% 3.5%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 6.5% 0.7% 3.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 67.9% 18.0% 71.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) 91.6% 15.1% 85.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.9% 12.4% 1.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.0% 11.0% 1.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusETFNVKMI
Forward P/E 11.5xFY2026 29.5xFY2026 20.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.80FY2026 $7.83FY2026 $1.63FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +48.8%FY2026 +40.3%FY2026 +25.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -9.4% +8.8% -11.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $124.23BFY2026 $2.66BFY2026 $17.89BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +45.2%FY2026 +46.4%FY2026 +5.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.4% +1.3% +0.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersETFNVKMI
Held by institutions 31.4% 71.6% 69.3%
Institutions holding 1,279 661 1,811
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.9% +0.4% +3.3%
Institutions buying 628 335 898
Institutions selling 340 207 647
Buyers to sellers 1.85 1.62 1.39

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ETFNVKMI
ET 1.00 0.00 0.59
FNV 0.00 1.00 0.00
KMI 0.59 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ET, FNV and KMI?

Kinder Morgan (KMI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Energy Transfer (ET) $70.32B, Franco Nevada (FNV) $45.55B, Kinder Morgan (KMI) $75.50B.

Which stock is cheaper, ET, FNV and KMI?

Energy Transfer (ET) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Energy Transfer (ET) 13.9x, Franco Nevada (FNV) 31.3x, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 21.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Energy Transfer (ET) is cheapest (Energy Transfer (ET) 11.5x, Franco Nevada (FNV) 29.5x, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 20.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Franco Nevada (FNV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Energy Transfer (ET) +33.3%, Franco Nevada (FNV) +73.6%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) +11.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Franco Nevada (FNV) has the highest net margin (Energy Transfer (ET) 4.7%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 62.8%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 19.6%). On return on invested capital, Energy Transfer (ET) leads (Energy Transfer (ET) 8.4%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kinder Morgan (KMI) returned the most: Energy Transfer (ET) +23.2%, Franco Nevada (FNV) +21.4%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) +31.2%. Over five years, Energy Transfer (ET) compounded fastest (Energy Transfer (ET) +16.2%/yr, Franco Nevada (FNV) +10.1%/yr, Kinder Morgan (KMI) +14.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Energy Transfer (ET) has the highest dividend yield: Energy Transfer (ET) 0.07%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 0.01%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 0.03%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Energy Transfer (ET) has been the steadiest (Energy Transfer (ET) 17.5%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 38.9%, Kinder Morgan (KMI) 21.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ET, FNV and KMI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Energy Transfer (ET) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.