EBF vs NWSA vs SCHL Stock Comparison

Ennis, News and Scholastic Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EBF Ennis, Inc.
$22.57 +2.0% 1M +33.2% 1Y
Market cap
$569.43M
P/E
14.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$397.15M
Div. yield
0.04%
Publishing Communication Services
6 wins
NWSA News Corp
$30.59 +7.4% 1M +16.2% 1Y
Market cap
$16.67B
P/E
29.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.03B
Div. yield
–
Publishing Communication Services
5 wins
SCHL Scholastic Corp
$38.76 +19.8% 1M +32.6% 1Y
Market cap
$739.94M
P/E
13.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.57B
Div. yield
0.03%
Publishing Communication Services
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ennis leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Ennis 6, News 5, Scholastic 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEBFNWSASCHLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $569.43M $16.67B $739.94M NWSA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.6x 29.1x 13.1x SCHL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.8x 24.5x 29.1x EBF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.3% +6.8% -2.5% NWSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.8% 6.3% 3.6% EBF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.6% 1.2% NWSA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.1x 0.8x NWSA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.04% 0.00% 0.03% EBF
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +33.2% +16.2% +32.6% EBF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.9%/yr +5.9%/yr +1.7%/yr NWSA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.3% 26.2% 35.4% EBF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 69/100 56/100 EBF

Percentile Scorecard

EBFNWSASCHL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEBFNWSASCHL
Valuation 89 #7 of 54 57 #24 of 54 60 #22 of 54
Growth 50 #23 of 45 93 #4 of 45 34 #30 of 45
Profitability 95 #3 of 43 79 #10 of 43 52 #21 of 43
Financial Health 97 #3 of 62 87 #9 of 62 67 #21 of 62
Shareholder Returns 24 #20 of 26 32 #18 of 26 64 #10 of 26
Overall 71 69 56
  • EBF ranked among 62 companies in Advertising and Media
  • NWSA ranked among 62 companies in Advertising and Media
  • SCHL ranked among 62 companies in Advertising and Media

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEBFNWSASCHLSPY
1 month +2.0%+7.4%+19.8% -0.8%
3 months +3.7%+12.1%-4.9% +3.5%
6 months +10.6%+15.8%-4.8% +7.0%
Year to date +25.3%+17.1%+30.8% +12.2%
1 year +33.2%+16.2%+32.6% +13.0%
3 years +7.7%+51.3%+4.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year +2.5%+14.8%+1.4% +23.1%
5 years +21.0%+33.2%+8.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year +3.9%+5.9%+1.7% +11.0%
10 years +49.0%+136.9%+1.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +4.1%+9.0%+0.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureEBFNWSASCHLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.3%26.2%35.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 22.4%27.6%37.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.050.180.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.560.620.92 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.1%-38.7%-66.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.6%-1.9%-18.1% -1.8%
52-week high $22.93$31.19$47.34 $779.14
52-week low $16.38$22.40$27.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEBFNWSASCHL
P/E now vs peer median 14.6xmedian 18.4x 29.7xmedian 18.4x 12.9xmedian 18.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 0.6x 1.9xmedian 0.6x 0.4xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.3xmedian 11.0x 11.0xmedian 11.0x 7.7xmedian 11.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.9xmedian 9.1x 21.0xmedian 9.1x -47.4xmedian 9.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 1.6x 1.8xmedian 1.6x 1.0xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median -3.24median 0.44 0.51median 0.44 0.72median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEBFNWSASCHL
Revenue $397.15M $9.03B $1.57B
Gross profit $121.66M – $888.70M
Operating income $54.19M – $15.20M
Net income $38.95M $743.00M $56.60M
Free cash flow $57.58M $811.00M -$14.40M
EPS (diluted) $1.54 $1.03 $2.99
Cash & equivalents $54.01M $2.10B $106.80M
Total debt – $1.99B $184.80M
Shares (diluted) 25.33M 558.40M 18.90M
Enterprise value $400.48M $8.16B $294.34M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEBFNWSASCHL
P/E 14.6x 29.7x 12.9x
P/FCF 9.9x 21.0x -47.4x
P/Operating cash flow 8.3x 13.8x 17.9x
P/S 1.4x 1.9x 0.4x
P/B 1.8x 1.8x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 2.3x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 7.3x 11.0x 7.7x
EV/EBIT 9.5x 16.2x 50.0x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 1.9x 0.5x
EV/FCF 9.0x 20.9x -52.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.6x 13.7x 20.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -3.24 0.51 0.72

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEBFNWSASCHL
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.3% 6.8% -2.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.7% 4.1% -2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.0% – -1.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -1.9% – -0.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.8% – 25.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -4.9% – -38.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -7.7% -44.6% 639.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -5.4% 58.4% -0.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -6.0% -50.4% 818.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -4.5% 58.6% 18.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 38.7% 26.5% -54.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.5% 16.8% -39.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 30.0% 42.0% -134.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.3% 23.6% -28.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEBFNWSASCHL
Gross margin 30.6% – 56.5%
EBITDA margin 17.9% 17.0% 6.2%
Operating margin 13.6% – 1.0%
Pretax margin 13.5% 11.6% 5.6%
Net margin 9.8% 6.3% 3.6%
FCF margin 14.5% 9.0% -0.9%
Operating cash flow margin 17.2% 13.7% 2.4%
Return on equity 12.5% 8.0% 8.0%
Return on assets 10.7% 4.8% 3.3%
Return on invested capital – 6.6% 1.2%
Return on capital employed 16.7% 8.2% 1.3%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.6x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 1.7x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEBFNWSASCHL
Debt / assets – 12.8% 10.7%
Debt / equity – 0.2x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.1x 0.8x
Debt / FCF – 2.5x -12.8x
Liabilities / assets 13.9% 40.6% 61.9%
Equity / assets 86.1% 59.4% 38.1%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 3.8x 1.6x 1.3x
Quick ratio 2.3x 1.4x 0.5x
Cash ratio 1.4x 0.8x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 9.47 2.53 2.21

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEBFNWSASCHL
Dividend yield 4.5% 0.7% 2.2%
Net buyback yield 1.0% 3.8% 38.9%
Shareholder yield 5.5% 4.4% 41.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 65.7% – 32.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) 44.4% – -129.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) -72.2% – -15.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -0.3% – -11.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEBFNWSASCHL
Forward P/E 14.8xFY2026 24.5xFY2027 29.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.53FY2026 $1.25FY2027 $1.33FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -7.8%FY2026 +5.9%FY2027 -28.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.2% +30.4% +78.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $380.54MFY2026 $9.15BFY2027 $1.66BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.0%FY2026 +1.3%FY2027 +5.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.5% +3.9% +4.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEBFNWSASCHL
Held by institutions 85.0% 100.0% 73.2%
Institutions holding 164 636 226
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% -3.3% -8.2%
Institutions buying 82 344 109
Institutions selling 44 189 89
Buyers to sellers 1.86 1.82 1.22

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EBFNWSASCHL
EBF 1.00 0.18 0.25
NWSA 0.18 1.00 0.13
SCHL 0.25 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EBF, NWSA and SCHL?

News (NWSA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ennis (EBF) $569.43M, News (NWSA) $16.67B, Scholastic (SCHL) $739.94M.

Which stock is cheaper, EBF, NWSA and SCHL?

Scholastic (SCHL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ennis (EBF) 14.6x, News (NWSA) 29.1x, Scholastic (SCHL) 13.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ennis (EBF) is cheapest (Ennis (EBF) 14.8x, News (NWSA) 24.5x, Scholastic (SCHL) 29.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

News (NWSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ennis (EBF) +2.3%, News (NWSA) +6.8%, Scholastic (SCHL) -2.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ennis (EBF) has the highest net margin (Ennis (EBF) 9.8%, News (NWSA) 6.3%, Scholastic (SCHL) 3.6%). On return on invested capital, News (NWSA) leads (News (NWSA) 6.6%, Scholastic (SCHL) 1.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ennis (EBF) returned the most: Ennis (EBF) +33.2%, News (NWSA) +16.2%, Scholastic (SCHL) +32.6%. Over five years, News (NWSA) compounded fastest (Ennis (EBF) +3.9%/yr, News (NWSA) +5.9%/yr, Scholastic (SCHL) +1.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ennis (EBF) has the highest dividend yield: Ennis (EBF) 0.04%, News (NWSA) 0.00%, Scholastic (SCHL) 0.03%. News (NWSA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ennis (EBF) has been the steadiest (Ennis (EBF) 21.3%, News (NWSA) 26.2%, Scholastic (SCHL) 35.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EBF, NWSA and SCHL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ennis (EBF) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.