EAF vs LOGC vs USLM Stock Comparison

Graftech International, ContextLogic Holdings and United States Lime & Minerals Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EAF Graftech International Ltd
$10.68 -3.5% 1M -37.3% 1Y
Market cap
$287.27M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$509.08M
Div. yield
–
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

United States Lime & Minerals leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (United States Lime & Minerals 4, ContextLogic Holdings 3, Graftech International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEAFLOGCUSLMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $287.27M $697.14M $3.15B USLM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.4x -303.1x 23.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 22.7x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.5% +20.3% +7.0% LOGC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -38.4% -2.9% 35.7% USLM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -12.9% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -23.1x 6.0x — EAF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.22% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -37.3% +99.2% -18.4% LOGC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -36.9%/yr -36.6%/yr +35.5%/yr USLM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 112.2% 27.3% 39.0% LOGC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 22/100 30/100 73/100 USLM

Percentile Scorecard

EAFLOGCUSLM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEAFLOGCUSLM
Valuation 21 #129 of 162 44 #91 of 162 49 #83 of 162
Growth 7 #137 of 147 10 #133 of 147 57 #64 of 147
Profitability 25 #92 of 122 38 #76 of 122 83 #22 of 122
Financial Health 20 #132 of 165 29 #118 of 165 96 #7 of 165
Shareholder Returns 40 #65 of 107 28 #77 of 107 81 #21 of 107
Overall 22 30 73
  • EAF ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • LOGC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • USLM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEAFLOGCUSLMSPY
1 month -3.5%+3.3%-1.6% -0.8%
3 months +37.1%+62.5%-4.2% +3.5%
6 months +12.3%+79.3%-14.7% +7.0%
Year to date -31.1%+101.1%-8.4% +12.2%
1 year -37.3%+99.2%-18.4% +13.0%
3 years -68.0%+315.3%+185.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year -31.6%+60.8%+41.9% +23.1%
5 years -90.0%-89.8%+356.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year -36.9%-36.6%+35.5% +11.0%
10 years ——+718.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+23.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureEAFLOGCUSLMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 112.2%27.3%39.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 128.7%25.9%44.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.960.341.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.333.63-0.47 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.1%-97.8%-45.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -40.7%0.0%-21.4% -1.8%
52-week high $18.01$15.24$139.46 $779.14
52-week low $5.23$7.05$97.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEAFLOGCUSLM
P/E now vs peer median -1.4xmedian 12.8x -303.1xmedian 12.8x 23.4xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 3.1x 8.8xmedian 3.1x 8.3xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -29.4xmedian 7.0x 27.0xmedian 7.0x 14.9xmedian 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.8xmedian 15.2x -16.0xmedian 15.2x 34.3xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median -0.7xmedian 2.1x 0.9xmedian 2.1x 4.5xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.02median 0.29 —median 0.29 0.83median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEAFLOGCUSLM
Revenue $509.08M $79.50M $376.92M
Gross profit -$34.13M $41.90M $182.84M
Operating income -$107.10M -$9.90M $158.71M
Net income -$195.63M -$300.00K $134.42M
Free cash flow -$158.11M -$43.60M $91.81M
R&D $6.05M – –
EPS (diluted) $-7.38 $-0.05 $4.67
Cash & equivalents $134.31M $11.00M $402.64M
Total debt $1.20B $211.50M –
Shares (diluted) 26.51M 45.74M 28.78M
Enterprise value -$251.08M $748.04M $1.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEAFLOGCUSLM
P/E -1.4x -303.1x 23.4x
P/FCF -1.8x -16.0x 34.3x
P/Operating cash flow -2.5x -17.6x 19.3x
P/S 0.6x 8.8x 8.3x
P/B -0.7x 0.9x 4.5x
P/Tangible book -0.7x 2.0x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA -29.4x 27.0x 14.9x
EV/EBIT -12.6x -90.7x 17.3x
EV/Revenue 2.7x 11.3x 7.3x
EV/FCF -8.6x -20.6x 29.9x
EV/Operating cash flow -12.0x -22.6x 16.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.02 – 0.83

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEAFLOGCUSLM
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.5% 20.3% 7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -11.4% – 12.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1,814% 63.7% 9.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -30.9% – 26.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -70.6% -186.8% 9.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -57.0% – 29.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.2% -106.5% 7.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -72.9% – 28.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 6.3% -129.1% 7.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -71.1% – 28.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -29.5% -590.1% 7.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -43.6% – 25.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -31.3% -1,218% -14.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -79.2% – 21.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEAFLOGCUSLM
Gross margin -6.7% 52.7% 48.5%
EBITDA margin -9.0% 41.8% 49.0%
Operating margin -21.0% -12.5% 42.1%
Pretax margin -36.8% -19.6% 45.7%
Net margin -38.4% -2.9% 35.7%
FCF margin -31.1% -54.8% 24.4%
Operating cash flow margin -22.2% -49.9% 43.1%
Return on equity – -2.1% 19.8%
Return on assets -18.9% -1.6% 18.4%
Return on invested capital -12.9% – –
Return on capital employed -12.1% -1.0% 22.3%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.1x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x 132.3x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 14.5% 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEAFLOGCUSLM
Debt / assets 117.4% 21.8% –
Debt / equity -3.1x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA -23.1x 6.0x –
Debt / FCF -7.6x -4.9x –
Liabilities / assets 138.0% 24.0% 6.9%
Equity / assets -38.0% 76.0% 93.1%
Interest coverage -1.1x – –
Current ratio 3.5x 1.9x 27.5x
Quick ratio 1.4x 1.2x 25.5x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.5x 22.2x
Altman Z-score -0.85 -2.97 39.86

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEAFLOGCUSLM
Dividend yield – – 0.2%
Net buyback yield -1.6% -3.7% 0.1%
Shareholder yield -1.6% -3.7% 0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 5.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 7.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 9.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 14.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEAFLOGCUSLM
Forward P/E – – 22.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-5.75FY2026 $-0.17FY2026 $4.84FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +3.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +25.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $469.57MFY2026 $0.00FY2025 $426.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -6.9%FY2026 -100.0%FY2025 +14.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.4% – +16.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEAFLOGCUSLM
Held by institutions 41.3% – 32.5%
Institutions holding 90 – 234
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.5% – +7.5%
Institutions buying 54 – 139
Institutions selling 22 – 66
Buyers to sellers 2.45 – 2.11

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EAFLOGCUSLM
EAF 1.00 0.05 0.14
LOGC 0.05 1.00 0.16
USLM 0.14 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EAF, LOGC and USLM?

United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Graftech International (EAF) $287.27M, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) $697.14M, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) $3.15B.

Which company is growing faster?

ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Graftech International (EAF) -2.5%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) +20.3%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) has the highest net margin (Graftech International (EAF) -38.4%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) -2.9%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 35.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) returned the most: Graftech International (EAF) -37.3%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) +99.2%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) -18.4%. Over five years, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) compounded fastest (Graftech International (EAF) -36.9%/yr, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) -36.6%/yr, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) +35.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Graftech International (EAF) 0.00%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 0.22%. Graftech International (EAF) and ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) has been the steadiest (Graftech International (EAF) 112.2%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) 27.3%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 39.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EAF, LOGC and USLM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.