DOO vs NIU vs THO Stock Comparison

Brp, Niu Technologies and Thor Industries Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DOO BRP Inc.
$58.44 +2.2% 1M -13.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.40B
P/E
54.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.74B
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
NIU Niu Technologies
$1.86 -9.3% 1M -57.5% 1Y
Market cap
$152.93M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$678.78M
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
1 win
THO Thor Industries Inc
$70.15 -2.7% 1M -36.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.69B
P/E
20.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.61B
Div. yield
0.03%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Thor Industries leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Thor Industries 7, Brp 3, Niu Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDOONIUTHOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.40B $152.93M $3.69B DOO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 54.1x -5.1x 20.8x THO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.8x — 20.1x THO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.2% +63.4% +0.3% NIU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.2% -4.4% 1.8% THO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.0% -19.6% 4.3% DOO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x — 0.8x THO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -13.1% -57.5% -36.7% DOO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -7.7%/yr -40.4%/yr -7.2%/yr THO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.8% 59.6% 39.2% THO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 42/100 62/100 THO

Percentile Scorecard

DOONIUTHO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDOONIUTHO
Valuation 82 #10 of 50 47 #27 of 50 78 #12 of 50
Growth 57 #21 of 48 55 #22 of 48 15 #41 of 48
Profitability 96 #3 of 46 33 #31 of 46 71 #14 of 46
Financial Health 29 #37 of 52 31 #36 of 52 86 #8 of 52
Shareholder Returns 24 #23 of 30 – 59 #13 of 30
Overall 58 42 62
  • DOO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • NIU ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • THO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDOONIUTHOSPY
1 month +2.2%-9.3%-2.7% -0.8%
3 months -5.3%-30.1%-8.4% +3.5%
6 months +6.3%-39.8%-10.8% +7.0%
Year to date -17.4%-38.6%-31.7% +12.2%
1 year -13.1%-57.5%-36.7% +13.0%
3 years -13.4%-5.6%-17.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year -4.7%-1.9%-6.2% +23.1%
5 years -32.8%-92.5%-31.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -7.7%-40.4%-7.2% +11.0%
10 years +192.2%—-13.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year +11.3%—-1.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureDOONIUTHOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.8%59.6%39.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.2%71.7%41.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.941.520.95 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.23-0.97-0.93 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.2%-94.0%-50.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.4%-57.3%-41.7% -1.8%
52-week high $81.64$4.36$120.34 $779.14
52-week low $50.93$1.85$63.86 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDOONIUTHO
P/E now vs peer median 52.6xmedian 18.9x -5.0xmedian 18.9x 20.7xmedian 18.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.5x 0.2xmedian 0.5x 0.4xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.1xmedian 8.2x —median 8.2x 7.0xmedian 8.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 9.4x —median 9.4x 21.4xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 0.9x 1.4xmedian 0.9x 0.8xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median -1.04median 1.40 0.18median 1.40 -0.97median 1.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDOONIUTHO
Revenue $6.74B $678.78M $9.61B
Gross profit $1.39B $123.64M $1.21B
Operating income $283.70M -$35.73M $309.23M
Net income $81.25M -$30.56M $179.04M
Free cash flow $856.16M – $168.84M
R&D $332.77M $26.77M –
EPS (diluted) $1.10 $-0.37 $3.38
Cash & equivalents $462.34M $163.70M $481.99M
Total debt $7.25B $227.75M $928.80M
Shares (diluted) 73.90M 79.86M 52.56M
Enterprise value $2.77B -$537.96M $2.08B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDOONIUTHO
P/E 52.6x -5.0x 20.7x
P/FCF 5.0x – 21.4x
P/Operating cash flow 4.0x – 11.3x
P/S 0.6x 0.2x 0.4x
P/B 17.9x 1.4x 0.8x
P/Tangible book -36.8x 1.4x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA 9.1x – 7.0x
EV/EBIT 19.6x -0.5x 13.2x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 0.0x 0.4x
EV/FCF 6.5x – 24.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.2x – 12.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.04 0.18 -0.97

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDOONIUTHO
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.2% 63.4% 0.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.3% 16.8% -4.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.3% 72.4% -9.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -12.4% 9.1% -8.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.6% -116.4% -26.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -36.5% -25.5% -24.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -15.6% -43.1% -30.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -52.2% -47.5% -21.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -11.7% -44.5% -30.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.7% -27.3% -21.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 96.6% – -44.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.8% – -31.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 259.1% – -62.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.3% – -39.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDOONIUTHO
Gross margin 20.6% 18.2% 12.6%
EBITDA margin 9.1% – 6.0%
Operating margin 4.2% -5.3% 3.2%
Pretax margin 1.8% -4.7% 2.5%
Net margin 1.2% -4.4% 1.8%
FCF margin 12.7% – 1.8%
Operating cash flow margin 16.0% – 3.3%
Return on equity 21.6% -27.2% 4.1%
Return on assets 1.7% -6.3% 2.5%
Return on invested capital 6.0% -19.6% 4.3%
Return on capital employed 10.1% -42.2% 5.6%
Asset turnover 1.4x 1.4x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.3x – 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDOONIUTHO
Debt / assets 37.7% 12.8% 13.4%
Debt / equity 7.5x 0.6x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x – 0.8x
Debt / FCF 2.1x – 5.5x
Liabilities / assets 94.9% 79.4% 38.7%
Equity / assets 5.1% 20.6% 61.3%
Interest coverage 1.9x -40.4x –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.0x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.5x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.5x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – 0.82 3.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDOONIUTHO
Dividend yield 1.6% – 2.2%
Net buyback yield -0.8% – 3.2%
Shareholder yield 0.7% – 5.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 59.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 63.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 2.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 4.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDOONIUTHO
Forward P/E 20.8xFY2026 – 20.1xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $2.81FY2026 $-0.37FY2026 $3.49FY2027
EPS growth, next FY -26.4%FY2026 – +3.3%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +31.7% – +34.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.01BFY2026 $758.50MFY2026 $9.03BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +13.1%FY2026 +23.2%FY2026 -6.1%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +3.0% +20.9% +17.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDOONIUTHO
Held by institutions 0.0% 7.2% 100.0%
Institutions holding 1 50 409
Change in shares held, QoQ – -17.0% +2.4%
Institutions buying 0 21 179
Institutions selling 0 17 153
Buyers to sellers – 1.24 1.17

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DOONIUTHO
DOO 1.00 0.04 0.39
NIU 0.04 1.00 0.13
THO 0.39 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DOO, NIU and THO?

Brp (DOO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brp (DOO) $4.40B, Niu Technologies (NIU) $152.93M, Thor Industries (THO) $3.69B.

Which stock is cheaper, DOO, NIU and THO?

Thor Industries (THO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brp (DOO) 54.1x, Niu Technologies (NIU) -5.1x, Thor Industries (THO) 20.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Thor Industries (THO) is cheapest (Brp (DOO) 20.8x, Thor Industries (THO) 20.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Niu Technologies (NIU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brp (DOO) +20.2%, Niu Technologies (NIU) +63.4%, Thor Industries (THO) +0.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Thor Industries (THO) has the highest net margin (Brp (DOO) 1.2%, Niu Technologies (NIU) -4.4%, Thor Industries (THO) 1.8%). On return on invested capital, Brp (DOO) leads (Brp (DOO) 6.0%, Niu Technologies (NIU) -19.6%, Thor Industries (THO) 4.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Brp (DOO) returned the most: Brp (DOO) -13.1%, Niu Technologies (NIU) -57.5%, Thor Industries (THO) -36.7%. Over five years, Thor Industries (THO) compounded fastest (Brp (DOO) -7.7%/yr, Niu Technologies (NIU) -40.4%/yr, Thor Industries (THO) -7.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Brp (DOO) 0.00%, Niu Technologies (NIU) 0.00%, Thor Industries (THO) 0.03%. Brp (DOO) and Niu Technologies (NIU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thor Industries (THO) has been the steadiest (Brp (DOO) 57.8%, Niu Technologies (NIU) 59.6%, Thor Industries (THO) 39.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DOO, NIU and THO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Thor Industries (THO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.