DOO vs LVWR vs MCFT Stock Comparison

Brp, LiveWire and MasterCraft Boat Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DOO BRP Inc.
$59.90 +4.8% 1M -10.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.37B
P/E
53.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.74B
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
LVWR LiveWire Group, Inc.
$1.86 +23.2% 1M -66.7% 1Y
Market cap
$350.62M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$31.29M
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Brp leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Brp 5, MasterCraft Boat Holdings 3, LiveWire 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDOOLVWRMCFTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.37B $350.62M $346.52M DOO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 53.7x -4.8x -208.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.3x — 10.2x MCFT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.2% +31.3% +22.8% LVWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.2% -234.5% -0.5% DOO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.0% -75.5% — DOO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x -0.4x — LVWR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.2% -66.7% -11.4% DOO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -7.7%/yr -28.3%/yr -5.5%/yr MCFT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.8% 151.1% 40.0% MCFT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 30/100 52/100 DOO

Percentile Scorecard

DOOLVWRMCFT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDOOLVWRMCFT
Valuation 82 #10 of 50 6 #47 of 50 49 #26 of 50
Growth 57 #21 of 48 83 #9 of 48 17 #40 of 48
Profitability 96 #3 of 46 9 #42 of 46 60 #19 of 46
Financial Health 29 #37 of 52 33 #35 of 52 82 #10 of 52
Shareholder Returns 24 #23 of 30 17 #25 of 30 52 #15 of 30
Overall 58 30 52
  • DOO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • LVWR ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • MCFT ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDOOLVWRMCFTSPY
1 month +4.8%+23.2%-3.1% -0.2%
3 months -4.1%-5.6%-20.4% +3.9%
6 months +12.3%-8.4%-14.7% +8.2%
Year to date -15.3%-57.9%+5.6% +12.9%
1 year -10.2%-66.7%-11.4% +12.3%
3 years -11.2%-80.4%-1.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year -3.9%-42.0%-0.4% +23.3%
5 years -33.1%-81.1%-24.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year -7.7%-28.3%-5.5% +10.9%
10 years +199.5%—+77.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year +11.6%—+5.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDOOLVWRMCFTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.8%151.1%40.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.2%123.7%39.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.951.010.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.18-0.44-0.29 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.2%-94.7%-57.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.6%-66.7%-27.1% -1.2%
52-week high $81.64$5.58$27.38 $779.14
52-week low $50.93$0.65$17.21 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDOOLVWRMCFT
P/E now vs peer median 53.9xmedian 19.4x -5.2xmedian 19.4x -206.1xmedian 19.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.5x 12.2xmedian 0.5x 1.0xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.2xmedian 8.3x -6.5xmedian 8.3x 23.8xmedian 8.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 9.4x -7.5xmedian 9.4x 15.3xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median 18.3xmedian 0.9x 32.0xmedian 0.9x 0.9xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median -1.06median 1.40 -0.26median 1.40 7.77median 1.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDOOLVWRMCFT
Revenue $6.74B $31.29M $348.90M
Gross profit $1.39B -$3.40M $79.78M
Operating income $283.70M -$72.24M -$1.11M
Net income $81.25M -$73.36M -$1.66M
Free cash flow $856.16M -$50.89M $22.38M
R&D $332.77M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.10 $-0.36 $-0.10
Cash & equivalents $462.34M $52.90M $43.87M
Total debt $7.25B $225.99M –
Shares (diluted) 73.90M 205.04M 17.16M
Enterprise value $2.73B $131.12M $69.32M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDOOLVWRMCFT
P/E 53.9x -5.2x -206.1x
P/FCF 5.1x -7.5x 15.3x
P/Operating cash flow 4.1x -8.0x 11.2x
P/S 0.6x 12.2x 1.0x
P/B 18.3x 32.0x 0.9x
P/Tangible book -37.8x 48.4x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 9.2x -6.5x 23.8x
EV/EBIT 20.0x -5.6x -268.1x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 13.0x 0.9x
EV/FCF 6.6x -8.0x 13.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.3x -8.5x 9.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.06 -0.26 7.77

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDOOLVWRMCFT
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.2% 31.3% 22.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.3% -6.9% -19.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.3% 60.0% 40.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -12.4% -61.0% -22.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.6% 20.4% -109.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -36.5% 12.2% -26.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -15.6% 12.2% -123.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -52.2% 19.5% -26.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -11.7% 12.8% -122.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.7% 19.9% -26.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 96.6% 38.5% -20.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.8% 20.1% -39.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 259.1% 38.2% -22.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.3% 22.6% -41.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDOOLVWRMCFT
Gross margin 20.6% -10.9% 22.9%
EBITDA margin 9.1% -201.0% 3.6%
Operating margin 4.2% -230.9% -0.3%
Pretax margin 1.8% -233.6% 0.4%
Net margin 1.2% -234.5% -0.5%
FCF margin 12.7% -162.7% 6.4%
Operating cash flow margin 16.0% -152.1% 8.7%
Return on equity 21.6% -364.6% -0.6%
Return on assets 1.7% -59.7% -0.4%
Return on invested capital 6.0% -75.5% –
Return on capital employed 10.1% -69.1% -0.4%
Asset turnover 1.4x 0.3x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.3x 0.6x -18.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 12.8% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDOOLVWRMCFT
Debt / assets 37.7% 65.1% –
Debt / equity 7.5x 6.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x -0.4x –
Debt / FCF 2.1x -1.5x –
Liabilities / assets 94.9% 89.9% 23.8%
Equity / assets 5.1% 10.1% 76.2%
Interest coverage 1.9x -25.2x -5.2x
Current ratio 1.2x 4.2x 1.6x
Quick ratio 0.4x 3.2x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 2.9x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – -3.01 2.91

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDOOLVWRMCFT
Dividend yield 1.5% – –
Net buyback yield -0.8% -0.3% 0.7%
Shareholder yield 0.7% -0.3% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDOOLVWRMCFT
Forward P/E 21.3xFY2026 – 10.2xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $2.81FY2026 $-0.26FY2026 $1.96FY2027
EPS growth, next FY -26.4%FY2026 – +11.4%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +31.7% – +16.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.01BFY2026 $192.71MFY2026 $662.23MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +13.1%FY2026 +650.7%FY2026 +89.8%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +3.0% +277.5% -6.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDOOLVWRMCFT
Held by institutions 41.5% 2.0% 72.9%
Institutions holding 143 62 152
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.7% +4.1% +14.6%
Institutions buying 87 32 108
Institutions selling 42 20 27
Buyers to sellers 2.07 1.60 4.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DOOLVWRMCFT
DOO 1.00 0.11 0.34
LVWR 0.11 1.00 0.21
MCFT 0.34 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DOO, LVWR and MCFT?

Brp (DOO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brp (DOO) $4.37B, LiveWire (LVWR) $350.62M, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) $346.52M.

Which company is growing faster?

LiveWire (LVWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brp (DOO) +20.2%, LiveWire (LVWR) +31.3%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) +22.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brp (DOO) has the highest net margin (Brp (DOO) 1.2%, LiveWire (LVWR) -234.5%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) -0.5%). On return on invested capital, Brp (DOO) leads (Brp (DOO) 6.0%, LiveWire (LVWR) -75.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Brp (DOO) returned the most: Brp (DOO) -10.2%, LiveWire (LVWR) -66.7%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) -11.4%. Over five years, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) compounded fastest (Brp (DOO) -7.7%/yr, LiveWire (LVWR) -28.3%/yr, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) -5.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) has been the steadiest (Brp (DOO) 57.8%, LiveWire (LVWR) 151.1%, MasterCraft Boat Holdings (MCFT) 40.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DOO, LVWR and MCFT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brp (DOO) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.