CXW vs NXDT vs UHT Stock Comparison

CoreCivic, Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust and Universal Health Realty Income Trust Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.
$30.64 -3.3% 1M +66.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.03B
P/E
23.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.48B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
10 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

CoreCivic leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (CoreCivic 10, Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust 1, Universal Health Realty Income Trust 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCXWNXDTUHTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.03B $278.81M $509.39M CXW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.7x -3.7x 25.1x CXW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.8x — 20.0x CXW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.3% -20.5% — CXW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.1% -94.2% — CXW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.6% -0.1% — CXW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 15.1x — CXW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 9.14% 8.14% NXDT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +66.8% +54.9% -1.5% CXW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +28.9%/yr -19.2%/yr -8.4%/yr CXW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.0% 61.2% 23.7% UHT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 30/100 — CXW

Percentile Scorecard

CXWNXDTUHT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCXWNXDTUHT
Valuation 48 #59 of 113 30 #102 of 145 26 #107 of 145
Growth 46 #52 of 96 6 #134 of 142 –
Profitability 52 #45 of 92 2 #132 of 135 –
Financial Health 40 #76 of 125 67 #46 of 136 –
Shareholder Returns 82 #13 of 67 44 #74 of 131 95 #8 of 131
Overall 53 30 –
  • CXW ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • NXDT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • UHT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCXWNXDTUHTSPY
1 month -3.3%+0.2%-5.6% +0.9%
3 months +3.0%+14.1%-18.1% +5.9%
6 months +49.2%+4.0%-9.8% +8.5%
Year to date +60.3%+37.1%-6.5% +13.3%
1 year +66.8%+54.9%-1.5% +12.4%
3 years +147.9%-29.0%-3.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year +35.4%-10.8%-1.2% +23.5%
5 years +255.9%-65.4%-35.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year +28.9%-19.2%-8.4% +11.0%
10 years +132.5%-75.8%-36.0% +263.4%
10 years, per year +8.8%-13.2%-4.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCXWNXDTUHTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.0%61.2%23.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.8%61.0%26.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.371.14-0.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.590.90-0.06 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.7%-84.7%-46.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.8%-9.3%-20.0% -0.9%
52-week high $35.53$5.79$45.82 $779.14
52-week low $16.13$2.66$36.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCXWNXDTUHT
P/E now vs peer median 23.7xmedian 21.5x -3.7xmedian 25.8x 25.1xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.9x 3.6xmedian 4.0x 5.3xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.0xmedian 11.9x 31.3xmedian 14.2x —median 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 52.9xmedian 13.9x -37.7xmedian 23.0x 11.0xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 2.3x 0.4xmedian 1.3x 3.7xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 3.34median 0.92 13.06median 1.91 5.20median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCXWNXDTUHT
Revenue $2.48B $78.07M –
Operating income – -$1.21M –
Net income $127.90M -$66.70M –
Free cash flow $57.32M -$7.40M –
EPS (diluted) $1.29 $-1.22 $1.45
Cash & equivalents $108.93M $11.67M $6.47M
Total debt $5.01B $1.16B –
Shares (diluted) 98.89M 60.44M 13.88M
Enterprise value $2.56B $286.06M $509.39M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCXWNXDTUHT
P/E 23.7x -3.7x 25.1x
P/FCF 52.9x -37.7x 11.0x
P/Operating cash flow 15.1x -89.5x –
P/S 1.2x 3.6x 5.3x
P/B 2.1x 0.4x 3.7x
P/Tangible book 2.1x 0.4x 3.7x
EV/EBITDA 11.0x 31.3x –
EV/EBIT 17.3x -445.0x –
EV/Revenue 1.7x 6.9x –
EV/FCF 74.5x -72.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 21.3x -173.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.34 13.06 5.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCXWNXDTUHT
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.3% -20.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.2% -16.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -414.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 22.9% 35.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.2% -23.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) 35.1% 42.1% 12.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.1% -0.3% 4.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -26.4% -188.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.6% -27.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -66.4% -648.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -19.8% -29.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCXWNXDTUHT
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 15.6% 22.1% –
Operating margin – -1.6% –
Pretax margin 7.0% -85.1% –
Net margin 5.1% -94.2% –
FCF margin 2.3% -9.5% –
Operating cash flow margin 8.1% -4.0% –
Return on equity 9.0% -10.0% –
Return on assets 3.7% -6.5% –
Return on invested capital 6.6% -0.1% –
Return on capital employed 8.5% – –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 0.0x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 6.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCXWNXDTUHT
Debt / assets 39.0% 26.2% –
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 15.1x –
Debt / FCF 23.5x -36.8x –
Liabilities / assets 58.4% 35.2% 75.7%
Equity / assets 41.6% 64.8% 24.3%
Interest coverage 3.3x -0.1x –
Current ratio 1.3x – –
Quick ratio 1.1x – –
Cash ratio 0.2x – –
Altman Z-score 1.89 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCXWNXDTUHT
Dividend yield – 9.1% 8.1%
Net buyback yield 6.3% -21.8% –
Shareholder yield 6.3% -12.6% 8.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -10.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -93.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 25.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCXWNXDTUHT
Forward P/E 1.8xFY2026 – 20.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $16.94FY2026 – $1.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1,468.5%FY2026 – +44.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -85.4% – -7.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.85BFY2026 – $104.34MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +29.1%FY2026 – +5.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.2% – -5.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCXWNXDTUHT
Held by institutions 87.5% 50.2% 61.7%
Institutions holding 278 126 184
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.2% +3.8% +18.8%
Institutions buying 155 80 93
Institutions selling 86 34 53
Buyers to sellers 1.80 2.35 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CXWNXDTUHT
CXW 1.00 0.08 0.04
NXDT 0.08 1.00 0.17
UHT 0.04 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CXW, NXDT and UHT?

CoreCivic (CXW) is the largest by market capitalisation: CoreCivic (CXW) $3.03B, Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust (NXDT) $278.81M, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) $509.39M.

Which stock is cheaper, CXW, NXDT and UHT?

CoreCivic (CXW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CoreCivic (CXW) 23.7x, Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust (NXDT) -3.7x, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) 25.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, CoreCivic (CXW) is cheapest (CoreCivic (CXW) 1.8x, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) 20.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

CoreCivic (CXW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CoreCivic (CXW) +24.3%, Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust (NXDT) -20.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

CoreCivic (CXW) has the highest net margin (CoreCivic (CXW) 5.1%, Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust (NXDT) -94.2%). On return on invested capital, CoreCivic (CXW) leads (CoreCivic (CXW) 6.6%, Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust (NXDT) -0.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CoreCivic (CXW) returned the most: CoreCivic (CXW) +66.8%, Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust (NXDT) +54.9%, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) -1.5%. Over five years, CoreCivic (CXW) compounded fastest (CoreCivic (CXW) +28.9%/yr, Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust (NXDT) -19.2%/yr, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) -8.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust (NXDT) has the highest dividend yield: CoreCivic (CXW) 0.00%, Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust (NXDT) 9.14%, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) 8.14%. CoreCivic (CXW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) has been the steadiest (CoreCivic (CXW) 42.0%, Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust (NXDT) 61.2%, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) 23.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CXW, NXDT and UHT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CoreCivic (CXW) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.