CV vs LNTH vs PHG Stock Comparison

CapsoVision, Lantheus Holdings and Koninklijke Philips Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CV CapsoVision, Inc
$6.89 +3.6% 1M +40.6% 1Y
Market cap
$337.08M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$14.41M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
1 win
LNTH Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
$99.92 +0.2% 1M +78.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.52B
P/E
23.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.56B
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
6 wins
PHG Koninklijke Philips Nv
$26.56 +6.4% 1M -7.9% 1Y
Market cap
$25.07B
P/E
13.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.60B
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lantheus Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Lantheus Holdings 6, Koninklijke Philips 4, CapsoVision 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCVLNTHPHGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $337.08M $6.52B $25.07B PHG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -12.3x 23.7x 13.6x PHG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 17.3x 13.4x PHG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.6% +2.3% +6.1% CV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -190.2% 17.7% 8.9% LNTH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 12.5% 11.5% LNTH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.1x 1.8x LNTH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +40.6% +78.2% -7.9% LNTH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +34.7%/yr -10.8%/yr LNTH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 96.1% 32.4% 28.8% PHG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 80/100 80/100 LNTH

Percentile Scorecard

CVLNTHPHG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCVLNTHPHG
Valuation 5 #217 of 228 81 #45 of 228 98 #6 of 228
Growth 42 #128 of 221 63 #83 of 221 96 #11 of 221
Profitability 23 #161 of 208 94 #13 of 208 96 #10 of 208
Financial Health 76 #59 of 239 69 #74 of 239 31 #166 of 239
Shareholder Returns – 93 #11 of 137 79 #29 of 137
Overall 36 80 80
  • CV ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • LNTH ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • PHG ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCVLNTHPHGSPY
1 month +3.6%+0.2%+6.4% -0.8%
3 months +4.2%-7.5%+6.2% +3.5%
6 months +8.2%+18.8%-3.6% +7.0%
Year to date -35.5%+50.1%-1.9% +12.2%
1 year +40.6%+78.2%-7.9% +13.0%
3 years —+49.5%+43.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+14.4%+12.8% +23.1%
5 years —+343.3%-43.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+34.7%-10.8% +11.0%
10 years —+1,048.5%-11.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+27.7%-1.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCVLNTHPHGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 96.1%32.4%28.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.7%27.5%28.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.620.590.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.422.42-0.27 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.8%-59.5%-75.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -52.2%-9.9%-19.3% -1.8%
52-week high $14.42$110.94$32.91 $779.14
52-week low $4.59$50.69$23.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCVLNTHPHG
P/E now vs peer median -12.5xmedian 30.6x 23.6xmedian 30.6x 13.7xmedian 30.6x
P/S now vs peer median 23.9xmedian 3.0x 4.2xmedian 3.0x 1.2xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -12.5xmedian 17.5x 16.4xmedian 17.5x 8.1xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 23.3x 16.8xmedian 23.3x 5.9xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 26.2xmedian 2.4x 5.0xmedian 2.4x 2.0xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.87 0.22median 0.87 0.32median 0.87

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCVLNTHPHG
Revenue $14.41M $1.56B $20.60B
Gross profit $7.55M $936.02M $16.03B
Operating income -$27.71M $302.34M $2.65B
Net income -$27.42M $275.31M $1.39B
Free cash flow – $387.83M $4.34B
R&D $20.51M $173.09M $2.00B
EPS (diluted) $-0.55 $4.08 $1.91
Cash & equivalents – $593.30M $2.04B
Total debt – $571.05M $9.51B
Shares (diluted) 49.94M 67.52M 962.50M
Enterprise value $337.08M $4.69B $14.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCVLNTHPHG
P/E -12.5x 23.6x 13.7x
P/FCF – 16.8x 5.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 15.8x 9.6x
P/S 23.9x 4.2x 1.2x
P/B 26.2x 5.0x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 26.2x 10.5x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA -12.5x 16.4x 8.1x
EV/EBIT -12.4x 21.5x 12.4x
EV/Revenue 23.9x 4.2x 1.6x
EV/FCF – 16.8x 7.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 15.7x 12.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.22 0.32

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCVLNTHPHG
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.6% 2.3% 6.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 11.4% 2.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.1% -3.4% 82.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 16.3% 6.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -36.1% -30.9% 121.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 118.8% 52.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -34.9% 1.6% 293.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 102.1% 35.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 93.8% 5.8% 539.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 105.5% 42.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -21.7% 116.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.5% 53.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -10.1% 54.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 103.0% 45.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCVLNTHPHG
Gross margin 52.4% 60.1% 77.8%
EBITDA margin -190.7% 25.4% 19.8%
Operating margin -192.3% 19.4% 12.9%
Pretax margin -190.1% 23.3% 11.9%
Net margin -190.2% 17.7% 8.9%
FCF margin – 24.9% 21.1%
Operating cash flow margin – 26.5% 12.9%
Return on equity -207.5% 21.8% 12.7%
Return on assets -149.3% 11.6% 5.4%
Return on invested capital – 12.5% 11.5%
Return on capital employed -209.8% 14.8% 11.8%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.5x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 5.0% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCVLNTHPHG
Debt / assets – 23.6% 31.2%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.1x 1.8x
Debt / FCF – 1.5x 2.2x
Liabilities / assets 29.1% 45.7% 57.1%
Equity / assets 70.9% 54.3% 42.9%
Interest coverage – 15.3x 6.2x
Current ratio 3.4x 3.1x 1.3x
Quick ratio – 2.8x 0.7x
Cash ratio – 1.8x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 22.08 5.46 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCVLNTHPHG
Dividend yield – – 3.7%
Net buyback yield – 2.9% -0.5%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.9% 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCVLNTHPHG
Forward P/E – 17.3xFY2026 13.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.58FY2026 $5.76FY2026 $1.98FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -5.3%FY2026 +6.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +4.2% -10.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $13.91MFY2026 $1.57BFY2026 $21.63BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.7%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +46.0% +12.7% -8.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCVLNTHPHG
Held by institutions 10.2% 100.0% 5.4%
Institutions holding 50 465 363
Change in shares held, QoQ +27.6% +3.4% +0.8%
Institutions buying 36 248 266
Institutions selling 8 142 76
Buyers to sellers 4.50 1.75 3.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CVLNTHPHG
CV 1.00 0.07 -0.02
LNTH 0.07 1.00 0.19
PHG -0.02 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CV, LNTH and PHG?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) is the largest by market capitalisation: CapsoVision (CV) $337.08M, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) $6.52B, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) $25.07B.

Which stock is cheaper, CV, LNTH and PHG?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CapsoVision (CV) -12.3x, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 23.7x, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 13.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) is cheapest (Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 17.3x, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 13.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

CapsoVision (CV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CapsoVision (CV) +14.6%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) +2.3%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) +6.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) has the highest net margin (CapsoVision (CV) -190.2%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 17.7%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 8.9%). On return on invested capital, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) leads (Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 12.5%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 11.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) returned the most: CapsoVision (CV) +40.6%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) +78.2%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -7.9%. Over five years, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) compounded fastest (Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) +34.7%/yr, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -10.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has been the steadiest (CapsoVision (CV) 96.1%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 32.4%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 28.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CV, LNTH and PHG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.