CUBE vs SMA vs UMH Stock Comparison

CubeSmart, SmartStop Self Storage REIT and Umh Properties Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CUBE CubeSmart
$40.61 +7.3% 1M -2.6% 1Y
Market cap
$9.28B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.14B
Div. yield
0.05%
Self-Storage REITs Real Estate
4 wins
UMH Umh Properties, Inc.
$15.35 -0.3% 1M +5.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.29B
P/E
93.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$271.36M
Div. yield
0.06%
Residential REITs Real Estate
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

CubeSmart leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (CubeSmart 4, SmartStop Self Storage REIT 4, Umh Properties 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCUBESMAUMHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.28B $1.96B $1.29B CUBE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2,836x 67.9x 93.9x SMA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.9x 56.0x 95.9x CUBE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.9% +21.1% +8.4% SMA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% 9.4% 5.1% SMA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 2.5% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 7.2x — CUBE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.05% 0.05% 0.06% UMH
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -2.6% -5.9% +5.1% UMH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.9%/yr — -8.7%/yr CUBE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 22.1% 27.1% 20.0% UMH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 55/100 48/100 SMA

Percentile Scorecard

CUBESMAUMH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCUBESMAUMH
Valuation 31 #101 of 145 19 #118 of 145 13 #126 of 145
Growth 16 #119 of 141 92 #12 of 141 79 #30 of 141
Profitability 76 #33 of 134 41 #80 of 134 47 #71 of 134
Financial Health 85 #22 of 138 53 #66 of 138 44 #78 of 138
Shareholder Returns 62 #51 of 131 69 #41 of 131 57 #57 of 131
Overall 54 55 48
  • CUBE ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • SMA ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • UMH ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCUBESMAUMHSPY
1 month +7.3%+11.2%-0.3% -0.2%
3 months -4.5%-0.2%-2.2% +3.9%
6 months +2.6%+10.1%-1.7% +8.2%
Year to date +12.6%+14.1%-3.5% +12.9%
1 year -2.6%-5.9%+5.1% +12.3%
3 years +19.5%—+13.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +6.1%—+4.3% +23.3%
5 years -26.0%—-36.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -5.9%—-8.7% +10.9%
10 years +64.9%—+27.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year +5.1%—+2.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCUBESMAUMHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 22.1%27.1%20.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 21.8%26.5%20.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.290.510.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.12-0.220.25 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.6%-24.0%-50.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.5%-5.9%-7.9% -1.2%
52-week high $42.51$37.51$16.67 $779.14
52-week low $35.36$29.63$14.14 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCUBESMAUMH
P/E now vs peer median -2,816xmedian 26.3x 67.7xmedian 26.3x 95.2xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 4.0x 6.4xmedian 4.0x 4.8xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 28.0xmedian 14.4x 20.4xmedian 14.4x —median 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.0xmedian 23.3x -67.3xmedian 23.3x -13.6xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 1.3x 1.6xmedian 1.3x 1.5xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 27.74median 1.91 0.88median 1.91 2.64median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCUBESMAUMH
Revenue $1.14B $306.46M $271.36M
Gross profit $770.66M $183.40M –
Operating income $87.22M $65.70M –
Net income $332.35M $30.62M $4.77M
Free cash flow $482.23M -$29.06M -$96.00M
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $0.52 $0.16
Cash & equivalents $14.31M $44.19M $28.62M
Total debt $450.84M $1.12B $1.16B
Shares (diluted) 227.19M 55.45M 85.58M
Enterprise value $9.14B $1.76B $1.12B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCUBESMAUMH
P/E -2,816x 67.7x 95.2x
P/FCF 19.0x -67.3x -13.6x
P/Operating cash flow 15.3x 17.7x 14.0x
P/S 8.1x 6.4x 4.8x
P/B 3.5x 1.6x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 3.5x 1.6x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 28.0x 20.4x –
EV/EBIT 110.0x 46.1x –
EV/Revenue 8.4x 9.9x 9.0x
EV/FCF 19.9x -104.3x -25.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.0x 27.5x 26.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 27.74 0.88 2.64

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCUBESMAUMH
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.9% 21.1% 8.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.0% 10.1% 9.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.8% 14.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.2% 5.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -39.8% 4.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.5% 0.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) -11.1% 214.8% -84.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -5.3% 42.0% 50.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -18.9% 206.1% 30.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -101.5% 76.7% 36.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2.6% 116.7% 15.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.5% 6.3% 32.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.0% 90.0% -89.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.1% -32.5% 17.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCUBESMAUMH
Gross margin 67.8% 59.8% –
EBITDA margin 30.2% 48.4% –
Operating margin 7.7% 21.4% –
Pretax margin 29.3% 5.7% –
Net margin -0.3% 9.4% 5.1%
FCF margin 42.4% -9.5% -35.4%
Operating cash flow margin 52.6% 36.0% 34.5%
Return on equity 12.6% 2.4% 3.8%
Return on assets 5.0% 1.3% 2.0%
Return on invested capital – 2.5% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 3.6x 19.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 4.8% 2.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCUBESMAUMH
Debt / assets 6.8% 45.9% 67.8%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.9x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 7.2x –
Debt / FCF 0.9x -38.5x -12.1x
Liabilities / assets 60.5% 48.4% 47.9%
Equity / assets 39.5% 51.6% 52.1%
Interest coverage – 1.3x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCUBESMAUMH
Dividend yield 5.2% 4.6% 6.0%
Net buyback yield 0.8% – -0.9%
Shareholder yield 6.0% 4.6% 5.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 144.4% 289.2% 1,523%
Payout ratio (FCF) 99.5% -304.8% -75.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.2% 76.9% 9.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 5.0% 18.9% 18.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCUBESMAUMH
Forward P/E 24.9xFY2026 56.0xFY2026 95.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.63FY2026 $0.63FY2026 $0.16FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.6%FY2026 – +128.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -9.2% -3.2% +12.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.19BFY2026 $266.15MFY2026 $260.25MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.9%FY2026 +11.6%FY2026 +14.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.2% -3.5% -1.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCUBESMAUMH
Held by institutions 100.0% 92.8% 75.8%
Institutions holding 516 262 258
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.1% +1.3% -3.4%
Institutions buying 287 142 131
Institutions selling 156 87 79
Buyers to sellers 1.84 1.63 1.66

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CUBESMAUMH
CUBE 1.00 0.73 0.48
SMA 0.73 1.00 0.48
UMH 0.48 0.48 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CUBE, SMA and UMH?

CubeSmart (CUBE) is the largest by market capitalisation: CubeSmart (CUBE) $9.28B, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) $1.96B, Umh Properties (UMH) $1.29B.

Which stock is cheaper, CUBE, SMA and UMH?

SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CubeSmart (CUBE) -2,836x, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) 67.9x, Umh Properties (UMH) 93.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, CubeSmart (CUBE) is cheapest (CubeSmart (CUBE) 24.9x, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) 56.0x, Umh Properties (UMH) 95.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CubeSmart (CUBE) +3.9%, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) +21.1%, Umh Properties (UMH) +8.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) has the highest net margin (CubeSmart (CUBE) -0.3%, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) 9.4%, Umh Properties (UMH) 5.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Umh Properties (UMH) returned the most: CubeSmart (CUBE) -2.6%, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) -5.9%, Umh Properties (UMH) +5.1%. Over five years, CubeSmart (CUBE) compounded fastest (CubeSmart (CUBE) -5.9%/yr, Umh Properties (UMH) -8.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Umh Properties (UMH) has the highest dividend yield: CubeSmart (CUBE) 0.05%, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) 0.05%, Umh Properties (UMH) 0.06%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Umh Properties (UMH) has been the steadiest (CubeSmart (CUBE) 22.1%, SmartStop Self Storage REIT (SMA) 27.1%, Umh Properties (UMH) 20.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CUBE, SMA and UMH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CubeSmart (CUBE) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.