CTAS vs CXW vs ROL Stock Comparison

Cintas, CoreCivic and Rollins Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CTAS Cintas Corp
$214.80 +7.4% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$84.94B
P/E
41.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.56B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
6 wins
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.
$30.79 -4.2% 1M +65.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.02B
P/E
23.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.48B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
5 wins
ROL Rollins Inc
$34.03 +13.3% 1M -39.5% 1Y
Market cap
$16.01B
P/E
30.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.99B
Div. yield
0.02%
Facility Services Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Cintas leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Cintas 6, CoreCivic 5, Rollins 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCTASCXWROLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $84.94B $3.02B $16.01B CTAS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 41.2x 23.6x 30.4x CXW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 36.7x 1.8x 31.2x CXW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.5% +24.3% +8.3% CXW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.8% 5.1% 13.2% CTAS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 28.2% 6.6% 26.0% CTAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 3.2x 0.7x CTAS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.02% ROL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.8% +65.9% -39.5% CXW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.1%/yr +29.2%/yr -0.5%/yr CXW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.8% 42.0% 30.1% CTAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 53/100 56/100 CTAS

Percentile Scorecard

CTASCXWROL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCTASCXWROL
Valuation 20 #90 of 112 48 #59 of 112 25 #84 of 112
Growth 71 #29 of 96 45 #53 of 96 61 #38 of 96
Profitability 98 #3 of 91 51 #45 of 91 97 #4 of 91
Financial Health 70 #38 of 125 40 #76 of 125 61 #49 of 125
Shareholder Returns 39 #41 of 67 82 #13 of 67 33 #45 of 67
Overall 60 53 56
  • CTAS ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • CXW ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • ROL ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCTASCXWROLSPY
1 month +7.4%-4.2%+13.3% -0.2%
3 months 0.0%+0.6%-12.8% +3.9%
6 months +23.3%+49.7%-38.9% +8.2%
Year to date +14.2%+61.1%-43.3% +12.9%
1 year +13.8%+65.9%-39.5% +12.3%
3 years +73.1%+149.1%-5.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year +20.1%+35.6%-2.0% +23.3%
5 years +101.7%+259.7%-2.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year +15.1%+29.2%-0.5% +10.9%
10 years +713.1%+130.6%+149.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year +23.3%+8.7%+9.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCTASCXWROLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.8%42.0%30.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.3%43.8%33.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.110.370.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.581.57-1.31 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.2%-39.7%-54.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.9%-13.3%-48.1% -1.2%
52-week high $225.93$35.53$65.60 $779.14
52-week low $163.55$16.13$29.68 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCTASCXWROL
P/E now vs peer median 41.7xmedian 21.2x 23.8xmedian 21.2x 31.0xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 0.9x 1.2xmedian 0.9x 4.1xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 11.9x 11.0xmedian 11.9x 19.6xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 42.2xmedian 13.7x 53.1xmedian 13.7x 24.2xmedian 13.7x
P/B now vs peer median 16.5xmedian 2.4x 2.1xmedian 2.4x 11.7xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.75median 1.00 3.36median 1.00 3.25median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCTASCXWROL
Revenue $11.56B $2.48B $3.99B
Gross profit $5.89B – $2.08B
Operating income $2.70B – $729.77M
Net income $2.06B $127.90M $526.12M
Free cash flow $2.03B $57.32M $671.82M
EPS (diluted) $5.10 $1.29 $1.10
Cash & equivalents $243.60M $108.93M $129.05M
Total debt $2.43B $5.01B $2.69B
Shares (diluted) 404.29M 98.89M 478.98M
Enterprise value $84.02B $2.55B $15.56B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCTASCXWROL
P/E 41.7x 23.8x 31.0x
P/FCF 42.2x 53.1x 24.2x
P/Operating cash flow 35.3x 15.2x 23.3x
P/S 7.4x 1.2x 4.1x
P/B 16.5x 2.1x 11.7x
P/Tangible book 17.4x 2.1x 20.3x
EV/EBITDA 27.4x 11.0x 19.6x
EV/EBIT 32.6x 17.3x 23.1x
EV/Revenue 7.6x 1.7x 4.2x
EV/FCF 43.3x 74.7x 25.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 36.2x 21.4x 24.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.75 3.36 3.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCTASCXWROL
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.5% 24.3% 8.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.7% 10.2% 10.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.5% – 6.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.2% – 10.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.8% – 1.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.2% – 9.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.3% 22.9% 2.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.3% 2.2% 8.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.7% 35.1% 3.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 15.2% 7.1% 9.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.8% -26.4% -0.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 2.6% 11.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 19.5% -66.4% -0.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.4% -19.8% 12.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCTASCXWROL
Gross margin 51.0% – 52.1%
EBITDA margin 27.8% 15.6% 21.6%
Operating margin 23.4% – 18.3%
Pretax margin 22.5% 7.0% 17.4%
Net margin 17.8% 5.1% 13.2%
FCF margin 17.6% 2.3% 16.8%
Operating cash flow margin 21.1% 8.1% 17.5%
Return on equity 39.8% 9.0% 37.3%
Return on assets 19.5% 3.7% 15.7%
Return on invested capital 28.2% 6.6% 26.0%
Return on capital employed 34.2% 8.5% 30.8%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.7x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.6x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 1.1% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCTASCXWROL
Debt / assets 22.8% 39.0% 21.6%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.9x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 3.2x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 1.2x 23.5x 1.1x
Liabilities / assets 51.1% 58.4% 58.6%
Equity / assets 48.9% 41.6% 41.4%
Interest coverage 25.3x 3.3x 20.1x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.3x 0.6x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.1x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 13.27 1.90 7.04

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCTASCXWROL
Dividend yield 0.9% – 2.1%
Net buyback yield 1.2% 6.2% 2.2%
Shareholder yield 2.0% 6.2% 4.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 35.2% – 66.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% – 52.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) 14.8% – 10.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 15.5% – 11.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCTASCXWROL
Forward P/E 36.7xFY2026 1.8xFY2026 31.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.85FY2026 $16.94FY2026 $1.09FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.4%FY2026 +1,468.5%FY2026 0.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.4% -85.4% +17.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.98BFY2026 $2.85BFY2026 $4.31BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 +29.1%FY2026 +14.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.8% -0.2% +5.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCTASCXWROL
Held by institutions 67.6% 87.5% 58.8%
Institutions holding 1,430 278 828
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.4% +0.2% +0.5%
Institutions buying 657 155 416
Institutions selling 576 86 323
Buyers to sellers 1.14 1.80 1.29

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CTASCXWROL
CTAS 1.00 0.03 0.40
CXW 0.03 1.00 0.03
ROL 0.40 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CTAS, CXW and ROL?

Cintas (CTAS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cintas (CTAS) $84.94B, CoreCivic (CXW) $3.02B, Rollins (ROL) $16.01B.

Which stock is cheaper, CTAS, CXW and ROL?

CoreCivic (CXW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cintas (CTAS) 41.2x, CoreCivic (CXW) 23.6x, Rollins (ROL) 30.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, CoreCivic (CXW) is cheapest (Cintas (CTAS) 36.7x, CoreCivic (CXW) 1.8x, Rollins (ROL) 31.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

CoreCivic (CXW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cintas (CTAS) +9.5%, CoreCivic (CXW) +24.3%, Rollins (ROL) +8.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cintas (CTAS) has the highest net margin (Cintas (CTAS) 17.8%, CoreCivic (CXW) 5.1%, Rollins (ROL) 13.2%). On return on invested capital, Cintas (CTAS) leads (Cintas (CTAS) 28.2%, CoreCivic (CXW) 6.6%, Rollins (ROL) 26.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CoreCivic (CXW) returned the most: Cintas (CTAS) +13.8%, CoreCivic (CXW) +65.9%, Rollins (ROL) -39.5%. Over five years, CoreCivic (CXW) compounded fastest (Cintas (CTAS) +15.1%/yr, CoreCivic (CXW) +29.2%/yr, Rollins (ROL) -0.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Rollins (ROL) has the highest dividend yield: Cintas (CTAS) 0.01%, CoreCivic (CXW) 0.00%, Rollins (ROL) 0.02%. CoreCivic (CXW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cintas (CTAS) has been the steadiest (Cintas (CTAS) 23.8%, CoreCivic (CXW) 42.0%, Rollins (ROL) 30.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CTAS, CXW and ROL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cintas (CTAS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.