CSCO vs MSFT Stock Comparison

Cisco Systems and Microsoft Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc.
$106.50 +0.1% 1M +51.6% 1Y
Market cap
$436.07B
P/E
32.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$63.33B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
3 wins
MSFT Microsoft Corp
$524.51 +4.8% 1M +0.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.96T
P/E
29.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$331.84B
Div. yield
0.01%
Cloud Platforms Technology
8 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Microsoft leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Microsoft 8, Cisco Systems 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCSCOMSFTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $436.07B $3.96T MSFT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 32.9x 29.6x MSFT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.5x 25.7x CSCO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.8% +17.8% MSFT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.0% 40.3% MSFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.9% 26.7% MSFT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x -0.2x MSFT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +51.6% +0.8% CSCO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.1%/yr +11.2%/yr CSCO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.4% 32.7% MSFT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 79/100 MSFT

Percentile Scorecard

CSCOMSFT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCSCOMSFT
Valuation 32 #77 of 112 54 #18 of 38
Growth 40 #66 of 109 77 #9 of 36
Profitability 88 #14 of 105 97 #2 of 34
Financial Health 28 #84 of 117 84 #7 of 38
Shareholder Returns 77 #20 of 82 81 #5 of 22
Overall 53 79
  • CSCO ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • MSFT ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCSCOMSFTSPY
1 month +0.1%+4.8% -1.0%
3 months -6.7%+37.4% +2.9%
6 months +19.6%+23.5% +6.4%
Year to date +38.3%+8.5% +11.4%
1 year +51.6%+0.8% +13.1%
3 years +100.9%+58.7% +79.4%
3 years, per year +26.2%+16.7% +21.5%
5 years +93.2%+69.7% +67.7%
5 years, per year +14.1%+11.2% +10.9%
10 years +253.2%+779.2% +255.2%
10 years, per year +13.5%+24.3% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureCSCOMSFTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.4%32.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.3%30.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.091.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.460.02 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.6%-37.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.1%-3.5% -2.5%
52-week high $130.00$543.45 $779.14
52-week low $70.27$352.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCSCOMSFT
P/E now vs peer median 31.7xmedian 31.3x 29.1xmedian 29.1x
P/S now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 2.6x 11.7xmedian 4.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 24.2xmedian 19.6x 19.4xmedian 21.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 32.9xmedian 28.3x 58.2xmedian 17.3x
P/B now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 2.9x 8.8xmedian 3.9x
PEG now vs peer median 11.78median 1.15 1.28median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCSCOMSFT
Revenue $63.33B $331.84B
Gross profit $40.86B $225.47B
Operating income $15.37B $155.24B
Net income $13.27B $133.75B
Free cash flow $12.77B $66.99B
R&D $9.56B $35.56B
EPS (diluted) $3.33 $17.95
Cash & equivalents $7.22B $20.94B
Total debt $29.53B $164.03B
Shares (diluted) 3.99B 7.45B
Enterprise value $371.99B $3.88T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCSCOMSFT
P/E 31.7x 29.1x
P/FCF 32.9x 58.2x
P/Operating cash flow 29.6x 21.3x
P/S 6.6x 11.7x
P/B 8.4x 8.8x
P/Tangible book 9.8x 9.2x
EV/EBITDA 24.2x 19.4x
EV/EBIT 28.2x 24.9x
EV/Revenue 6.9x 11.6x
EV/FCF 34.0x 57.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 30.6x 21.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 11.78 1.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCSCOMSFT
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.8% 17.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.6% 16.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.1% 16.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.6% 15.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 30.7% 20.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 20.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 30.3% 31.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 1.7% 22.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 30.7% 31.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.7% 22.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -0.1% 34.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.7% 27.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.9% -6.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -12.5% 4.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCSCOMSFT
Gross margin 64.5% 67.9%
EBITDA margin 28.3% 59.9%
Operating margin 24.3% 46.8%
Pretax margin 25.3% 50.0%
Net margin 21.0% 40.3%
FCF margin 20.2% 20.2%
Operating cash flow margin 22.4% 55.1%
Return on equity 26.8% 31.2%
Return on assets 10.4% 18.4%
Return on invested capital 15.9% 26.7%
Return on capital employed 17.9% 27.8%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 6.0% 3.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCSCOMSFT
Debt / assets 22.8% 5.3%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x -0.2x
Debt / FCF 2.3x 0.6x
Liabilities / assets 61.2% 41.7%
Equity / assets 38.8% 58.3%
Interest coverage 10.5x 50.9x
Current ratio 0.9x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 4.05 9.18

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCSCOMSFT
Dividend yield 1.6% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 1.3% 0.5%
Shareholder yield 2.9% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 19.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 39.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 9.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCSCOMSFT
Forward P/E 22.5xFY2027 25.7xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $4.74FY2027 $20.38FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +9.5%FY2027 +17.9%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +20.7% +11.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $74.93BFY2027 $402.02BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +18.3%FY2027 +21.1%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +0.6% +12.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCSCOMSFT
Held by institutions 80.1% 73.9%
Institutions holding 4,044 6,227
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.0% +3.3%
Institutions buying 1,846 3,432
Institutions selling 1,816 2,425
Buyers to sellers 1.02 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CSCOMSFT
CSCO 1.00 0.03
MSFT 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CSCO and MSFT?

Microsoft (MSFT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cisco Systems (CSCO) $436.07B, Microsoft (MSFT) $3.96T.

Which stock is cheaper, CSCO and MSFT?

Microsoft (MSFT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 32.9x, Microsoft (MSFT) 29.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cisco Systems (CSCO) is cheapest (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 22.5x, Microsoft (MSFT) 25.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Microsoft (MSFT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cisco Systems (CSCO) +11.8%, Microsoft (MSFT) +17.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Microsoft (MSFT) has the highest net margin (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 21.0%, Microsoft (MSFT) 40.3%). On return on invested capital, Microsoft (MSFT) leads (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 15.9%, Microsoft (MSFT) 26.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cisco Systems (CSCO) returned the most: Cisco Systems (CSCO) +51.6%, Microsoft (MSFT) +0.8%. Over five years, Cisco Systems (CSCO) compounded fastest (Cisco Systems (CSCO) +14.1%/yr, Microsoft (MSFT) +11.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cisco Systems (CSCO) 0.00%, Microsoft (MSFT) 0.01%. Cisco Systems (CSCO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Microsoft (MSFT) has been the steadiest (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 35.4%, Microsoft (MSFT) 32.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do CSCO and MSFT move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.03, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, CSCO and MSFT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Microsoft (MSFT) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.