CRWV vs GOOGL vs MSFT Stock Comparison

CoreWeave, Alphabet and Microsoft Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc.
$63.93 -24.9% 1M -52.6% 1Y
Market cap
$34.60B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.59B
Div. yield
–
Cloud Platforms Technology
2 wins
GOOGL Alphabet Inc.
$324.89 -5.2% 1M +21.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.46T
P/E
14.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$471.10B
Div. yield
–
Digital Advertising Technology
5 wins
MSFT Microsoft Corp
$531.01 +4.3% 1M -2.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.90T
P/E
27.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$346.45B
Div. yield
0.01%
Cloud Platforms Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Alphabet leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Alphabet 5, Microsoft 4, CoreWeave 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRWVGOOGLMSFTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $34.60B $3.46T $3.90T MSFT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -17.9x 14.7x 27.3x GOOGL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.4x 26.0x GOOGL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +115.3% +22.2% +17.9% CRWV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -25.4% — 41.2% MSFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.2% — 26.5% MSFT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x — -0.1x CRWV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -52.6% +21.5% -2.0% GOOGL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +17.0%/yr +9.9%/yr GOOGL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 96.2% 31.3% 32.6% GOOGL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 54/100 79/100 MSFT

Percentile Scorecard

CRWVGOOGLMSFT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRWVGOOGLMSFT
Valuation 62 #15 of 38 30 #117 of 166 60 #16 of 38
Growth 60 #15 of 36 82 #29 of 152 77 #9 of 36
Profitability 52 #17 of 34 62 #58 of 152 97 #2 of 34
Financial Health 38 #24 of 38 79 #38 of 179 84 #7 of 38
Shareholder Returns 30 #15 of 21 19 #76 of 94 80 #5 of 21
Overall 48 54 79
  • CRWV ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • GOOGL ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • MSFT ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRWVGOOGLMSFTSPY
1 month -24.9%-5.2%+4.3% +0.9%
3 months +5.1%-3.5%+36.0% +5.9%
6 months -44.0%-7.2%+25.1% +8.5%
Year to date -10.7%+3.8%+9.8% +13.3%
1 year -52.6%+21.5%-2.0% +12.4%
3 years —+165.9%+61.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year —+38.6%+17.2% +23.5%
5 years —+119.4%+60.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year —+17.0%+9.9% +11.0%
10 years —+692.8%+786.9% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+23.0%+24.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCRWVGOOGLMSFTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 96.2%31.3%32.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 92.4%28.9%30.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.661.350.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.550.69-0.06 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.5%-44.3%-37.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.3%-19.3%-2.3% -0.9%
52-week high $139.93$402.62$543.45 $779.14
52-week low $54.24$267.47$352.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRWVGOOGLMSFT
P/E now vs peer median -18.3xmedian 27.6x 16.8xmedian 16.8x 27.6xmedian 27.6x
P/S now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 4.8x 8.4xmedian 1.4x 11.4xmedian 4.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.6xmedian 24.1x —median 13.9x 19.1xmedian 24.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.6xmedian 15.0x 77.8xmedian 11.4x 65.8xmedian 15.0x
P/B now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 4.4x 5.8xmedian 1.8x 8.4xmedian 4.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.38 0.29median 0.36 1.21median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRWVGOOGLMSFT
Revenue $7.59B $471.10B $346.45B
Gross profit $5.12B – $234.39B
Operating income -$230.74M $156.98B $163.19B
Net income -$1.93B $235.69B $142.63B
Free cash flow -$13.66B – $59.96B
R&D – $74.46B $36.46B
EPS (diluted) $-3.50 $19.12 $19.16
Cash & equivalents $5.52B $56.33B $20.28B
Total debt $3.66B – $35.48B
Shares (diluted) 551.00M 12.31B 7.45B
Enterprise value $21.70B $3.14T $3.83T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRWVGOOGLMSFT
P/E -18.3x 16.8x 27.6x
P/FCF -2.6x 77.8x 65.8x
P/Operating cash flow 5.1x 22.0x 20.1x
P/S 4.6x 8.4x 11.4x
P/B 7.0x 5.8x 8.4x
P/Tangible book 7.4x 5.9x 8.7x
EV/EBITDA 8.6x – 19.1x
EV/EBIT -144.5x – 24.0x
EV/Revenue 4.4x 7.8x 11.3x
EV/FCF -2.4x – 65.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.8x 20.5x 20.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.29 1.21

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRWVGOOGLMSFT
Revenue growth (1Y) 115.3% 22.2% 17.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 16.6% 16.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 94.9% – 16.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 15.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -204.2% 26.5% 20.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 25.8% 20.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -89.8% 89.7% 36.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 52.3% 22.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -50.8% 87.8% 36.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 57.2% 22.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 983.6% 18.6% 33.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 19.0% 27.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -72.1% – -23.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -1.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRWVGOOGLMSFT
Gross margin 67.4% – 67.7%
EBITDA margin 51.2% – 59.3%
Operating margin -3.0% – 47.1%
Pretax margin -25.3% – 51.3%
Net margin -25.4% – 41.2%
FCF margin -179.9% – 17.3%
Operating cash flow margin 91.1% 38.1% 56.5%
Return on equity -39.4% 35.8% 31.2%
Return on assets -2.9% 24.5% 18.6%
Return on invested capital -1.2% – 26.5%
Return on capital employed -0.5% – 26.5%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -3.6x 0.8x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 8.2% 6.5% 3.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRWVGOOGLMSFT
Debt / assets 4.8% – 4.6%
Debt / equity 0.7x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x – -0.1x
Debt / FCF -0.3x – 0.6x
Liabilities / assets 93.5% 32.5% 39.6%
Equity / assets 6.5% 67.5% 60.4%
Interest coverage – – 50.6x
Current ratio 0.5x 2.8x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.4x 2.0x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.3x 2.0x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 0.13 – 9.49

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRWVGOOGLMSFT
Dividend yield – 0.3% 0.7%
Net buyback yield -8.5% – 0.5%
Shareholder yield -8.5% 0.3% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 19.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 45.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 9.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 10.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRWVGOOGLMSFT
Forward P/E – 15.4xFY2026 26.0xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.88FY2026 $21.10FY2026 $20.39FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – +95.2%FY2026 +18.0%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – -31.6% +11.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $13.22BFY2026 $528.22BFY2026 $402.39BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +157.7%FY2026 +31.1%FY2026 +21.3%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +113.8% +21.6% +12.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRWVGOOGLMSFT
Held by institutions 87.2% 80.1% 73.9%
Institutions holding 962 5,741 6,230
Change in shares held, QoQ +27.1% +4.6% +3.3%
Institutions buying 690 2,657 3,434
Institutions selling 171 2,573 2,426
Buyers to sellers 4.04 1.03 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRWVGOOGLMSFT
CRWV 1.00 0.16 0.27
GOOGL 0.16 1.00 0.16
MSFT 0.27 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRWV, GOOGL and MSFT?

Microsoft (MSFT) is the largest by market capitalisation: CoreWeave (CRWV) $34.60B, Alphabet (GOOGL) $3.46T, Microsoft (MSFT) $3.90T.

Which stock is cheaper, CRWV, GOOGL and MSFT?

Alphabet (GOOGL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CoreWeave (CRWV) -17.9x, Alphabet (GOOGL) 14.7x, Microsoft (MSFT) 27.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Alphabet (GOOGL) is cheapest (Alphabet (GOOGL) 15.4x, Microsoft (MSFT) 26.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

CoreWeave (CRWV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CoreWeave (CRWV) +115.3%, Alphabet (GOOGL) +22.2%, Microsoft (MSFT) +17.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Microsoft (MSFT) has the highest net margin (CoreWeave (CRWV) -25.4%, Microsoft (MSFT) 41.2%). On return on invested capital, Microsoft (MSFT) leads (CoreWeave (CRWV) -1.2%, Microsoft (MSFT) 26.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Alphabet (GOOGL) returned the most: CoreWeave (CRWV) -52.6%, Alphabet (GOOGL) +21.5%, Microsoft (MSFT) -2.0%. Over five years, Alphabet (GOOGL) compounded fastest (Alphabet (GOOGL) +17.0%/yr, Microsoft (MSFT) +9.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: CoreWeave (CRWV) 0.00%, Alphabet (GOOGL) 0.00%, Microsoft (MSFT) 0.01%. CoreWeave (CRWV) and Alphabet (GOOGL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Alphabet (GOOGL) has been the steadiest (CoreWeave (CRWV) 96.2%, Alphabet (GOOGL) 31.3%, Microsoft (MSFT) 32.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRWV, GOOGL and MSFT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Alphabet (GOOGL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.