CPNG vs LYFT vs UBER Stock Comparison

Coupang, Lyft and Uber Technologies Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CPNG Coupang, Inc.
$13.90 -2.8% 1M -55.4% 1Y
Market cap
$24.70B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$35.46B
Div. yield
–
Online Retail Consumer Discretionary
LYFT Lyft, Inc.
$16.94 +14.7% 1M -17.6% 1Y
Market cap
$6.49B
P/E
2.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.77B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
5 wins
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc
$66.67 -4.0% 1M -29.5% 1Y
Market cap
$134.60B
P/E
14.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.23B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Uber Technologies leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Uber Technologies 6, Lyft 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCPNGLYFTUBERLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.70B $6.49B $134.60B UBER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -32.2x 2.3x 14.1x LYFT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 29.2x 19.1x UBER
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.9% +10.8% +16.7% UBER
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.2% 42.3% 17.3% LYFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -10.6% 0.0% 17.4% UBER
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 49.4x -25.9x 1.0x LYFT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -55.4% -17.6% -29.5% LYFT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.7%/yr -18.9%/yr +7.9%/yr UBER
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.1% 47.9% 35.4% UBER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 32/100 71/100 67/100 LYFT

Percentile Scorecard

CPNGLYFTUBER

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCPNGLYFTUBER
Valuation 10 #94 of 104 83 #30 of 167 60 #67 of 167
Growth 9 #90 of 99 89 #18 of 153 86 #23 of 153
Profitability 22 #77 of 99 57 #67 of 153 78 #34 of 153
Financial Health 33 #76 of 113 46 #98 of 179 48 #94 of 179
Shareholder Returns 86 #11 of 73 80 #20 of 94 63 #35 of 94
Overall 32 71 67
  • CPNG ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • LYFT ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • UBER ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCPNGLYFTUBERSPY
1 month -2.8%+14.7%-4.0% -1.0%
3 months -10.3%+19.3%+1.1% +2.9%
6 months -32.2%+19.0%-10.7% +6.4%
Year to date -41.1%-12.5%-18.4% +11.4%
1 year -55.4%-17.6%-29.5% +13.1%
3 years -23.2%+64.0%+50.9% +79.4%
3 years, per year -8.4%+17.9%+14.7% +21.5%
5 years -52.1%-64.9%+46.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year -13.7%-18.9%+7.9% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureCPNGLYFTUBERSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.1%47.9%35.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 50.1%53.7%35.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.381.380.83 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.15-0.37-0.83 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.3%-85.8%-56.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -56.7%-31.1%-33.1% -2.5%
52-week high $32.13$24.57$99.72 $779.14
52-week low $13.76$12.65$65.95 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCPNGLYFTUBER
P/E now vs peer median -32.6xmedian 16.7x 2.2xmedian 17.5x 14.2xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.5x 0.9xmedian 1.4x 2.5xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -301.4xmedian 9.1x 180.8xmedian 14.9x 19.2xmedian 14.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 251.6xmedian 16.6x 5.8xmedian 11.2x 13.4xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 8.3xmedian 1.7x 2.1xmedian 1.7x 4.8xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.58median 0.73 0.04median 0.42 0.07median 0.42

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCPNGLYFTUBER
Revenue $35.46B $6.77B $55.23B
Gross profit $10.06B $3.08B $23.36B
Operating income -$628.00M -$119.72M $6.70B
Net income -$767.00M $2.87B $9.67B
Free cash flow $99.00M $1.11B $10.12B
R&D – $472.97M $3.74B
EPS (diluted) $-0.43 $7.42 $4.67
Cash & equivalents $6.11B $1.14B $4.87B
Total debt $2.60B $990.56M $12.72B
Shares (diluted) 1.80B 386.33M 2.05B
Enterprise value -$1.26B -$855.68M $106.40B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCPNGLYFTUBER
P/E -32.6x 2.2x 14.2x
P/FCF 251.6x 5.8x 13.4x
P/Operating cash flow 17.5x 5.4x 13.0x
P/S 0.7x 0.9x 2.5x
P/B 8.3x 2.1x 4.8x
P/Tangible book 8.8x 2.2x 5.0x
EV/EBITDA -301.4x 180.8x 19.2x
EV/EBIT -34.1x -46.8x 21.4x
EV/Revenue 0.6x 0.8x 2.6x
EV/FCF 216.2x 5.0x 14.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.0x 4.7x 13.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.58 0.04 0.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCPNGLYFTUBER
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.9% 10.8% 16.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.1% 16.8% 16.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.3% 20.9% 24.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 22.6% 20.8% 19.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -186.7% -117.1% 48.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -52.0% 54.4% 139.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -310.1% 3,009% -23.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -55.9% 61.1% 203.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -316.7% 3,303% -21.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -55.9% 60.8% 203.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -25.4% 14.0% 18.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.1% 98.9% 73.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -87.3% 12.0% 18.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -55.0% 72.6% 79.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCPNGLYFTUBER
Gross margin 28.4% 45.5% 42.3%
EBITDA margin -0.2% 0.5% 13.5%
Operating margin -1.8% -1.8% 12.1%
Pretax margin -1.7% -0.1% 12.1%
Net margin -2.2% 42.3% 17.3%
FCF margin 0.3% 16.4% 18.3%
Operating cash flow margin 4.0% 17.6% 18.9%
Return on equity -22.2% 94.7% 35.9%
Return on assets -4.4% 31.8% 15.4%
Return on invested capital -10.6% 0.0% 17.4%
Return on capital employed -9.3% -2.9% 14.0%
Asset turnover 2.0x 0.8x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.9x 0.4x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 4.6% 3.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCPNGLYFTUBER
Debt / assets 15.0% 10.9% 19.3%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.3x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 49.4x -25.9x 1.0x
Debt / FCF 26.3x 0.9x 1.3x
Liabilities / assets 82.8% 66.8% 57.1%
Equity / assets 17.2% 33.2% 42.9%
Interest coverage -8.3x -5.9x 14.5x
Current ratio 0.9x 0.6x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.4x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.4x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 2.47 -0.06 3.13

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCPNGLYFTUBER
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 4.4% 10.8% 5.0%
Shareholder yield 4.4% 10.8% 5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCPNGLYFTUBER
Forward P/E – 29.2xFY2026 19.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.51FY2026 $0.58FY2026 $3.49FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -563.6%FY2026 -91.5%FY2026 -26.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +79.3% +20.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $36.30BFY2026 $6.97BFY2026 $61.46BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.1%FY2026 +10.3%FY2026 +18.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.5% +11.1% +15.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCPNGLYFTUBER
Held by institutions 81.8% 100.0% 82.5%
Institutions holding 588 528 2,410
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.8% +5.2% +1.3%
Institutions buying 262 260 1,184
Institutions selling 243 175 976
Buyers to sellers 1.08 1.49 1.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CPNGLYFTUBER
CPNG 1.00 0.27 0.21
LYFT 0.27 1.00 0.59
UBER 0.21 0.59 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CPNG, LYFT and UBER?

Uber Technologies (UBER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Coupang (CPNG) $24.70B, Lyft (LYFT) $6.49B, Uber Technologies (UBER) $134.60B.

Which stock is cheaper, CPNG, LYFT and UBER?

Lyft (LYFT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Coupang (CPNG) -32.2x, Lyft (LYFT) 2.3x, Uber Technologies (UBER) 14.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Uber Technologies (UBER) is cheapest (Lyft (LYFT) 29.2x, Uber Technologies (UBER) 19.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Uber Technologies (UBER) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Coupang (CPNG) +9.9%, Lyft (LYFT) +10.8%, Uber Technologies (UBER) +16.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lyft (LYFT) has the highest net margin (Coupang (CPNG) -2.2%, Lyft (LYFT) 42.3%, Uber Technologies (UBER) 17.3%). On return on invested capital, Uber Technologies (UBER) leads (Coupang (CPNG) -10.6%, Lyft (LYFT) 0.0%, Uber Technologies (UBER) 17.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lyft (LYFT) returned the most: Coupang (CPNG) -55.4%, Lyft (LYFT) -17.6%, Uber Technologies (UBER) -29.5%. Over five years, Uber Technologies (UBER) compounded fastest (Coupang (CPNG) -13.7%/yr, Lyft (LYFT) -18.9%/yr, Uber Technologies (UBER) +7.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Uber Technologies (UBER) has been the steadiest (Coupang (CPNG) 48.1%, Lyft (LYFT) 47.9%, Uber Technologies (UBER) 35.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CPNG, LYFT and UBER?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Uber Technologies (UBER) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.