COLM vs LULU vs VFC Stock Comparison

Columbia Sportswear, Lululemon Athletica and V F Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
COLM Columbia Sportswear Co
$61.35 +8.0% 1M +12.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.11B
P/E
15.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.41B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
LULU lululemon athletica inc.
$99.01 -3.2% 1M -44.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.63B
P/E
8.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.09B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
6 wins
VFC V F Corp
$17.25 +27.6% 1M +8.6% 1Y
Market cap
$6.64B
P/E
24.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.51B
Div. yield
0.02%
Apparel Consumer Discretionary

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Lululemon Athletica leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Lululemon Athletica 6, Columbia Sportswear 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCOLMLULUVFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.11B $11.63B $6.64B LULU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.1x 8.2x 24.2x LULU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.5x 9.6x 15.5x LULU
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.1% +1.7% +0.2% LULU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.0% 12.8% 2.9% LULU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 8.3% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 3.3x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.4% -44.7% +8.6% COLM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.1%/yr -25.2%/yr -24.6%/yr COLM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.1% 46.8% 48.8% COLM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 78/100 50/100 LULU

Percentile Scorecard

COLMLULUVFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCOLMLULUVFC
Valuation 80 #10 of 46 87 #7 of 46 49 #24 of 46
Growth 29 #31 of 43 31 #30 of 43 76 #11 of 43
Profitability 71 #13 of 42 98 #2 of 42 59 #18 of 42
Financial Health 81 #11 of 53 77 #13 of 53 25 #40 of 53
Shareholder Returns 85 #6 of 34 97 #2 of 34 39 #21 of 34
Overall 69 78 50
  • COLM ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • LULU ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • VFC ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCOLMLULUVFCSPY
1 month +8.0%-3.2%+27.6% -1.0%
3 months -1.6%-13.4%+1.3% +2.9%
6 months +1.8%-31.1%-12.8% +6.4%
Year to date +11.4%-52.4%-4.6% +11.4%
1 year +12.4%-44.7%+8.6% +13.1%
3 years -12.9%-75.5%-3.7% +79.4%
3 years, per year -4.5%-37.4%-1.3% +21.5%
5 years -38.1%-76.5%-75.6% +67.7%
5 years, per year -9.1%-25.2%-24.6% +10.9%
10 years +2.6%+73.7%-68.4% +255.2%
10 years, per year +0.3%+5.7%-10.9% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureCOLMLULUVFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.1%46.8%48.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.0%51.8%51.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.641.181.69 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.34-0.960.18 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.0%-82.0%-87.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.5%-54.1%-20.0% -2.5%
52-week high $67.79$215.88$21.55 $779.14
52-week low $49.63$91.88$12.62 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCOLMLULUVFC
P/E now vs peer median 15.2xmedian 15.9x 7.9xmedian 15.9x 24.7xmedian 15.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.7x 1.0xmedian 0.7x 0.7xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 9.2x 3.6xmedian 9.2x 11.3xmedian 9.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.8xmedian 12.2x 7.8xmedian 12.2x 10.8xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 2.2x 2.2xmedian 2.2x 3.8xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -2.90median 0.57 0.47median 0.57 0.76median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCOLMLULUVFC
Revenue $3.41B $11.09B $9.51B
Gross profit $1.78B $6.22B $5.23B
Operating income $257.00M $1.98B $580.11M
Net income $206.03M $1.42B $274.18M
Free cash flow $321.30M $1.35B $628.20M
EPS (diluted) $4.02 $12.56 $0.70
Cash & equivalents $532.31M $1.39B $670.06M
Total debt – – $16.84B
Shares (diluted) 51.26M 112.92M 392.11M
Enterprise value $925.90M $5.88B $3.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCOLMLULUVFC
P/E 15.2x 7.9x 24.7x
P/FCF 9.8x 7.8x 10.8x
P/Operating cash flow 8.2x 5.3x 9.0x
P/S 0.9x 1.0x 0.7x
P/B 2.0x 2.2x 3.8x
P/Tangible book 2.1x 2.2x 22.5x
EV/EBITDA 8.0x 3.6x 11.3x
EV/EBIT 9.8x 4.6x 16.6x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 0.8x 1.0x
EV/FCF 7.8x 6.8x 15.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 6.6x 4.6x 12.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.90 0.47 0.76

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCOLMLULUVFC
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.1% 1.7% 0.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.5% 7.9% -4.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.2% -3.4% 2.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.3% 7.5% -2.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -5.8% -20.7% 70.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -10.9% 8.5% -14.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -8.3% -20.6% 680.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -11.0% 12.1% 32.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.1% -15.8% 677.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -5.3% 16.6% 32.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 20.0% 3.7% 115.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 58.0% 6.6% 96.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.9% 15.9% 141.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 92.8% 11.8% 60.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCOLMLULUVFC
Gross margin 52.2% 56.1% 55.0%
EBITDA margin 9.2% 22.7% 9.0%
Operating margin 7.5% 17.8% 6.1%
Pretax margin 8.1% 18.1% 3.8%
Net margin 6.0% 12.8% 2.9%
FCF margin 9.4% 12.2% 6.6%
Operating cash flow margin 11.2% 17.9% 7.9%
Return on equity 12.9% 29.5% 15.2%
Return on assets 7.7% 16.7% 2.9%
Return on invested capital – – 8.3%
Return on capital employed 13.3% 29.5% 9.0%
Asset turnover 1.3x 1.3x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 1.4x 2.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.8% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCOLMLULUVFC
Debt / assets – – 37.1%
Debt / equity – – 2.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 3.3x
Debt / FCF – – 5.6x
Liabilities / assets 42.8% 43.5% 81.4%
Equity / assets 57.2% 56.5% 18.6%
Interest coverage – – 3.8x
Current ratio 2.5x 2.2x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.9x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.8x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 4.40 4.81 1.74

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCOLMLULUVFC
Dividend yield 2.0% – 2.1%
Net buyback yield 6.9% 10.9% –
Shareholder yield 8.8% 10.9% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 51.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 22.4%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -39.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCOLMLULUVFC
Forward P/E 14.5xFY2026 9.6xFY2026 15.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.23FY2026 $10.28FY2026 $1.11FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.6%FY2026 -22.5%FY2026 +32.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.3% -16.1% +14.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.31BFY2026 $11.00BFY2026 $9.78BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -2.8%FY2026 -0.9%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.4% -9.7% -4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCOLMLULUVFC
Held by institutions 51.1% 71.6% 91.8%
Institutions holding 323 846 553
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% -2.1% +3.6%
Institutions buying 161 407 267
Institutions selling 111 330 182
Buyers to sellers 1.45 1.23 1.47

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

COLMLULUVFC
COLM 1.00 0.41 0.56
LULU 0.41 1.00 0.39
VFC 0.56 0.39 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, COLM, LULU and VFC?

Lululemon Athletica (LULU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Columbia Sportswear (COLM) $3.11B, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) $11.63B, V F (VFC) $6.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, COLM, LULU and VFC?

Lululemon Athletica (LULU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Columbia Sportswear (COLM) 15.1x, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 8.2x, V F (VFC) 24.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) is cheapest (Columbia Sportswear (COLM) 14.5x, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 9.6x, V F (VFC) 15.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lululemon Athletica (LULU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Columbia Sportswear (COLM) -0.1%, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) +1.7%, V F (VFC) +0.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lululemon Athletica (LULU) has the highest net margin (Columbia Sportswear (COLM) 6.0%, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 12.8%, V F (VFC) 2.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Columbia Sportswear (COLM) returned the most: Columbia Sportswear (COLM) +12.4%, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) -44.7%, V F (VFC) +8.6%. Over five years, Columbia Sportswear (COLM) compounded fastest (Columbia Sportswear (COLM) -9.1%/yr, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) -25.2%/yr, V F (VFC) -24.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Columbia Sportswear (COLM) 0.00%, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 0.00%, V F (VFC) 0.02%. Columbia Sportswear (COLM) and Lululemon Athletica (LULU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Columbia Sportswear (COLM) has been the steadiest (Columbia Sportswear (COLM) 36.1%, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 46.8%, V F (VFC) 48.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, COLM, LULU and VFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.