CNTN vs UTKN vs WEWA Stock Comparison

Canton Strategic Holdings, Universal Token and Wewards Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UTKN Universal Token
$1.70 -1.2% 1M -58.5% 1Y
Market cap
$172.65M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
-$1.45K
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
1 win
WEWA Wewards, Inc.
$2.00 0.0% 1M -5.2% 1Y
Market cap
$214.97M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Wewards leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Wewards 2, Canton Strategic Holdings 1, Universal Token 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNTNUTKNWEWALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $441.32M $172.65M $214.97M CNTN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.5x -616.6x -599.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -38.2% -58.5% -5.2% WEWA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +131.8%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 93.4% 184.2% 5.4% WEWA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 38/100 50/100 — UTKN

Percentile Scorecard

CNTNUTKNWEWA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNTNUTKNWEWA
Valuation 37 #63 of 99 39 #61 of 99 41 #59 of 99
Growth 8 #87 of 94 57 #41 of 94 84 #16 of 94
Profitability 39 #55 of 90 35 #59 of 90 –
Financial Health 97 #4 of 105 69 #33 of 105 –
Shareholder Returns 12 #54 of 61 – –
Overall 38 50 –
  • CNTN ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • UTKN ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • WEWA ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNTNUTKNWEWASPY
1 month -25.7%-1.2%0.0% -0.2%
3 months -6.4%+26.9%0.0% +3.9%
6 months -42.1%+9.7%0.0% +8.2%
Year to date -37.0%-38.8%-5.2% +12.9%
1 year -38.2%-58.5%-5.2% +12.3%
3 years -97.1%—-1.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year -69.3%—-0.3% +23.3%
5 years ——+6,566.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year ——+131.8% +10.9%
10 years ——+9,900.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+58.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCNTNUTKNWEWASPY
Volatility, 1Y 93.4%184.2%5.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 98.8%410.1%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.910.620.01 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.41-0.32-0.97 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.9%-77.2%-9.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -65.1%-58.5%-5.2% -1.2%
52-week high $5.48$4.10$2.11 $779.14
52-week low $1.69$1.02$2.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNTNUTKNWEWA
P/E now vs peer median -4.2xmedian 20.0x -616.6xmedian 20.0x -599.4xmedian 20.0x
P/S now vs peer median 276.9xmedian 2.3x -119,401xmedian 2.3x —median 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.5x —median 17.5x —median 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -18.7xmedian 15.9x -621.4xmedian 15.9x -5,608xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 2.0x 156.5xmedian 2.0x 2,866,225xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median -0.48median 1.03 —median 1.03 -27.22median 1.03

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNTNUTKNWEWA
Revenue – -$1.45K –
Operating income -$53.77M -$279.60K -$66.83K
Net income -$98.12M -$280.01K -$358.65K
Free cash flow -$22.17M -$277.85K -$38.34K
EPS (diluted) $-0.45 $0.00 $0.00
Cash & equivalents $37.24M $223.00 –
Shares (diluted) 216.86M 101.56M 107.48M
Enterprise value $342.93M $172.63M $214.97M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNTNUTKNWEWA
P/E -4.2x -616.6x -599.4x
P/FCF -18.7x -621.4x -5,608x
P/Operating cash flow -18.7x -621.4x -5,608x
P/S 276.9x -119,401x –
P/B 0.9x 156.5x 2,866,225x
P/Tangible book -6.1x 157.1x 2,866,225x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT -7.0x -617.7x -3,217x
EV/Revenue – -119,431x –
EV/FCF -17.0x -621.5x -5,608x
EV/Operating cash flow -17.0x -621.5x -5,608x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.48 – -27.22

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNTNUTKNWEWA
Revenue growth (1Y) – – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -360.0% -17.7% 24.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -81.6% – 35.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -716.7% -12.9% 39.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -122.4% – 22.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 89.2% -12.4% 39.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.8% – 22.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -127.9% -3.9% 45.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -44.0% – 46.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -127.9% -3.9% 45.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -44.0% – 46.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNTNUTKNWEWA
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – –
Net margin – – –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – 19,215% –
Return on equity -17.8% -25.2% –
Return on assets -14.3% -24.3% -191,282%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -9.4% -24.4% –
Asset turnover – 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 1.0x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNTNUTKNWEWA
Debt / assets – 3.8% –
Debt / equity – 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – -0.2x –
Liabilities / assets 19.4% 4.5% –
Equity / assets 80.6% 95.5% 100.0%
Interest coverage – – -0.2x
Current ratio 15.7x 0.9x –
Quick ratio 14.2x 0.0x –
Cash ratio 14.2x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score – 2,003 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNTNUTKNWEWA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -24.7% – –
Shareholder yield -24.7% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNTNUTKNWEWA
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.70FY2026 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2024 – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCNTNUTKNWEWA
Held by institutions 9.3% – –
Institutions holding 68 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +70.5% – –
Institutions buying 60 – –
Institutions selling 5 – –
Buyers to sellers 12.00 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNTNUTKNWEWA
CNTN 1.00 -0.06 0.03
UTKN -0.06 1.00 0.00
WEWA 0.03 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNTN, UTKN and WEWA?

Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) $441.32M, Universal Token (UTKN) $172.65M, Wewards (WEWA) $214.97M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Wewards (WEWA) returned the most: Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) -38.2%, Universal Token (UTKN) -58.5%, Wewards (WEWA) -5.2%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wewards (WEWA) has been the steadiest (Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) 93.4%, Universal Token (UTKN) 184.2%, Wewards (WEWA) 5.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CNTN, UTKN and WEWA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wewards (WEWA) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.