CNTN vs TONX vs UTKN Stock Comparison

Canton Strategic Holdings, TON Strategy and Universal Token Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TONX TON Strategy Co
$3.35 -15.8% 1M -19.5% 1Y
Market cap
$197.33M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
1 win
UTKN Universal Token
$1.70 -1.2% 1M -58.5% 1Y
Market cap
$153.36M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
-$1.45K
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
1 win

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Canton Strategic Holdings leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Canton Strategic Holdings 2, TON Strategy 1, Universal Token 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNTNTONXUTKNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $456.50M $197.33M $153.36M CNTN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.7x — -547.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -30.4% -19.5% -58.5% TONX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -81.8%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 93.6% 102.4% 184.2% CNTN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 — 50/100 UTKN

Percentile Scorecard

CNTNTONXUTKN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNTNTONXUTKN
Valuation 38 #62 of 99 – 40 #60 of 99
Growth 8 #87 of 94 – 56 #42 of 94
Profitability 39 #55 of 90 – 35 #59 of 90
Financial Health 97 #4 of 105 – 69 #33 of 105
Shareholder Returns 14 #51 of 59 – –
Overall 39 – 50
  • CNTN ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • TONX ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • UTKN ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNTNTONXUTKNSPY
1 month -24.2%-15.8%-1.2% +0.9%
3 months +5.7%+12.4%+26.9% +5.9%
6 months -34.6%+62.6%+9.7% +8.5%
Year to date -32.7%+68.3%-38.8% +13.3%
1 year -30.4%-19.5%-58.5% +12.4%
3 years -96.9%-94.7%— +88.1%
3 years, per year -68.6%-62.6%— +23.5%
5 years —-100.0%— +68.2%
5 years, per year —-81.8%— +11.0%
10 years —-100.0%— +263.4%
10 years, per year —-56.1%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCNTNTONXUTKNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 93.6%102.4%184.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 98.9%93.5%410.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.932.810.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.32-0.19-0.32 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.9%-100.0%-77.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -62.8%-22.3%-58.5% -0.9%
52-week high $5.48$4.31$4.10 $779.14
52-week low $1.69$1.80$1.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNTNTONXUTKN
P/E now vs peer median -4.5xmedian 19.6x —median 19.6x -616.6xmedian 19.6x
P/S now vs peer median 295.8xmedian 2.3x —median 2.3x -119,401xmedian 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.5x —median 17.5x —median 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -20.0xmedian 15.9x —median 15.9x -621.4xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.0x —median 2.0x 156.5xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median -0.51median 1.01 —median 1.01 —median 1.01

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNTNTONXUTKN
Revenue – – -$1.45K
Operating income -$53.77M – -$279.60K
Net income -$98.12M – -$280.01K
Free cash flow -$22.17M – -$277.85K
EPS (diluted) $-0.45 – $0.00
Cash & equivalents $37.24M – $223.00
Shares (diluted) 216.86M 58.67M 101.56M
Enterprise value $358.11M $197.33M $153.33M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNTNTONXUTKN
P/E -4.5x – -616.6x
P/FCF -20.0x – -621.4x
P/Operating cash flow -20.0x – -621.4x
P/S 295.8x – -119,401x
P/B 1.0x – 156.5x
P/Tangible book -6.5x – 157.1x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT -7.5x – -617.7x
EV/Revenue – – -119,431x
EV/FCF -18.3x – -621.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -18.3x – -621.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.51 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNTNTONXUTKN
Revenue growth (1Y) – – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -360.0% – -17.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -81.6% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -716.7% – -12.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -122.4% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 89.2% – -12.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.8% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -127.9% – -3.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -44.0% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -127.9% – -3.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -44.0% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNTNTONXUTKN
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – –
Net margin – – –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – 19,215%
Return on equity -17.8% – -25.2%
Return on assets -14.3% – -24.3%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -9.4% – -24.4%
Asset turnover – – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x – 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNTNTONXUTKN
Debt / assets – – 3.8%
Debt / equity – – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – -0.2x
Liabilities / assets 19.4% – 4.5%
Equity / assets 80.6% – 95.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 15.7x – 0.9x
Quick ratio 14.2x – 0.0x
Cash ratio 14.2x – 0.0x
Altman Z-score – – 2,003

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNTNTONXUTKN
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -23.2% – –
Shareholder yield -23.2% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNTNTONXUTKN
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.70FY2026 $-4.95FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2024 $118.07MFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +823.9%FY2027 –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCNTNTONXUTKN
Held by institutions 9.3% 58.2% –
Institutions holding 68 40 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +70.5% +119.1% –
Institutions buying 60 21 –
Institutions selling 5 11 –
Buyers to sellers 12.00 1.91 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNTNTONXUTKN
CNTN 1.00 0.27 -0.06
TONX 0.27 1.00 -0.03
UTKN -0.06 -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNTN, TONX and UTKN?

Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) $456.50M, TON Strategy (TONX) $197.33M, Universal Token (UTKN) $153.36M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year TON Strategy (TONX) returned the most: Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) -30.4%, TON Strategy (TONX) -19.5%, Universal Token (UTKN) -58.5%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) has been the steadiest (Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) 93.6%, TON Strategy (TONX) 102.4%, Universal Token (UTKN) 184.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CNTN, TONX and UTKN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.