CNTM vs LIF vs RUN Stock Comparison

ConnectM Technology Solutions, Life360 and Sunrun Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LIF Life360, Inc.
$44.02 +7.1% 1M -53.6% 1Y
Market cap
$3.50B
P/E
23.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$572.56M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
4 wins
RUN Sunrun Inc.
$7.27 -10.4% 1M -65.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.80B
P/E
4.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.48B
Div. yield
–
Solar Installers Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Life360 leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Life360 4, Sunrun 3, ConnectM Technology Solutions 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNTMLIFRUNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.87M $3.50B $1.80B LIF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.9x 23.7x 4.5x RUN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 33.3x 5.2x RUN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +23.6% +34.0% +63.2% RUN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.3% 25.7% 11.6% LIF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 0.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 17.3x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -47.1% -53.6% -65.1% CNTM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -33.1%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 132.4% 77.0% 82.2% LIF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 79/100 44/100 LIF

Percentile Scorecard

CNTMLIFRUN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNTMLIFRUN
Valuation 85 #20 of 124 72 #36 of 124 78 #12 of 52
Growth 71 #33 of 113 100 #1 of 113 92 #4 of 37
Profitability 55 #50 of 110 70 #34 of 110 31 #26 of 37
Financial Health 12 #114 of 129 75 #33 of 129 5 #54 of 57
Shareholder Returns – – 15 #23 of 27
Overall 56 79 44
  • CNTM ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • LIF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • RUN ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNTMLIFRUNSPY
1 month -20.0%+7.1%-10.4% -0.8%
3 months -25.7%-18.2%-27.2% +3.5%
6 months -47.2%-0.9%-44.2% +7.0%
Year to date -68.0%-31.4%-60.5% +12.2%
1 year -47.1%-53.6%-65.1% +13.0%
3 years -98.8%—-17.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year -77.0%—-6.3% +23.1%
5 years ——-86.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year ——-33.1% +11.0%
10 years ——+31.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+2.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCNTMLIFRUNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 132.4%77.0%82.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 132.1%85.7%91.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.102.342.76 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.36-0.70-0.79 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-65.6%-90.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.8%-55.7%-66.0% -1.8%
52-week high $16.00$99.32$21.41 $779.14
52-week low $3.90$38.10$6.89 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNTMLIFRUN
P/E now vs peer median 10.2xmedian 38.1x 24.2xmedian 38.1x 4.3xmedian 25.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 4.3x 6.2xmedian 4.3x 0.5xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 35.4x 125.4xmedian 35.4x 19.4xmedian 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 27.1x 34.6xmedian 27.1x 6.1xmedian 22.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 3.4x 5.8xmedian 3.4x 0.4xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.38median 1.27 0.39median 1.27 0.08median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNTMLIFRUN
Revenue $36.02M $572.56M $3.48B
Gross profit $11.16M $444.26M $1.23B
Operating income -$12.45M $6.51M $92.29M
Net income $2.42M $147.29M -$958.46M
Free cash flow – $103.24M $287.45M
R&D – $152.42M $38.46M
EPS (diluted) $0.03 $1.72 $1.47
Cash & equivalents $2.39M $267.06M –
Total debt $56.72M – $14.53B
Shares (diluted) 72.32M 85.59M 274.00M
Enterprise value $14.87M $1.93B $1.80B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNTMLIFRUN
P/E 10.2x 24.2x 4.3x
P/FCF – 34.6x 6.1x
P/Operating cash flow – 34.3x -8.7x
P/S 0.7x 6.2x 0.5x
P/B 1.5x 5.8x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 6.7x 0.4x
EV/EBITDA – 125.4x 19.4x
EV/EBIT -3.0x 508.2x 176.4x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 5.8x 4.7x
EV/FCF – 32.0x 56.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 31.7x -81.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.38 0.39 0.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNTMLIFRUN
Revenue growth (1Y) 23.6% 34.0% 63.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 28.9% 12.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 35.0% 34.8% 192.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 33.0% 70.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.9% 31.6% 102.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -62.4% 28.5% 28.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 108.3% 434.2% 74.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.4% 69.1% -6.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 106.0% 427.2% 115.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.7% 61.4% 54.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 136.7% 75.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 85.0% 42.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 144.9% 128.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 84.6% 27.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNTMLIFRUN
Gross margin 31.0% 77.6% 35.3%
EBITDA margin – 4.6% 24.2%
Operating margin -34.6% 1.1% 2.7%
Pretax margin -41.0% 2.5% -26.4%
Net margin 6.3% 25.7% 11.6%
FCF margin – 18.0% 8.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 18.2% -5.8%
Return on equity 27.8% 24.3% -22.2%
Return on assets 5.4% 14.1% -4.2%
Return on invested capital – – 0.5%
Return on capital employed -149.0% 0.7% 0.4%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.7x 0.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 12.1% 3.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNTMLIFRUN
Debt / assets 31.1% – 62.2%
Debt / equity 1.0x – 3.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 17.3x
Debt / FCF – – 50.5x
Liabilities / assets 70.1% 41.7% 81.2%
Equity / assets 29.9% 58.3% 18.8%
Interest coverage -7.6x – –
Current ratio 0.2x 5.6x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.1x 3.6x –
Cash ratio 0.1x 2.5x –
Altman Z-score -1.86 5.84 0.04

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNTMLIFRUN
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -0.7%
Shareholder yield – – -0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNTMLIFRUN
Forward P/E – 33.3xFY2026 5.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.87FY2026 $1.32FY2026 $1.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -45.7%FY2026 -18.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +25.8% -54.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $76.76MFY2026 $718.60MFY2026 $3.22BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +114.2%FY2026 +46.8%FY2026 +8.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.7% +19.2% -2.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCNTMLIFRUN
Held by institutions – 40.8% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 205 396
Change in shares held, QoQ – +4.5% +4.4%
Institutions buying – 116 225
Institutions selling – 65 107
Buyers to sellers – 1.78 2.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNTMLIFRUN
CNTM 1.00 0.02 0.04
LIF 0.02 1.00 0.13
RUN 0.04 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNTM, LIF and RUN?

Life360 (LIF) is the largest by market capitalisation: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) $24.87M, Life360 (LIF) $3.50B, Sunrun (RUN) $1.80B.

Which stock is cheaper, CNTM, LIF and RUN?

Sunrun (RUN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 10.9x, Life360 (LIF) 23.7x, Sunrun (RUN) 4.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sunrun (RUN) is cheapest (Life360 (LIF) 33.3x, Sunrun (RUN) 5.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sunrun (RUN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) +23.6%, Life360 (LIF) +34.0%, Sunrun (RUN) +63.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Life360 (LIF) has the highest net margin (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 6.3%, Life360 (LIF) 25.7%, Sunrun (RUN) 11.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) returned the most: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) -47.1%, Life360 (LIF) -53.6%, Sunrun (RUN) -65.1%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Life360 (LIF) has been the steadiest (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 132.4%, Life360 (LIF) 77.0%, Sunrun (RUN) 82.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CNTM, LIF and RUN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Life360 (LIF) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.