CHDN vs LVS vs PENN Stock Comparison

Churchill Downs, Las Vegas Sands and PENN Entertainment Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CHDN Churchill Downs Inc
$83.73 +4.1% 1M -19.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.88B
P/E
14.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.99B
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp
$35.67 -9.0% 1M -37.3% 1Y
Market cap
$23.34B
P/E
14.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.60B
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Las Vegas Sands leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Las Vegas Sands 6, Churchill Downs 4, PENN Entertainment 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHDNLVSPENNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.88B $23.34B $1.99B LVS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.2x 14.5x -2.2x CHDN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.8x 12.4x 17.5x CHDN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.7% +10.9% +6.1% LVS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.8% 11.8% -12.7% CHDN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.4% 14.9% -11.9% LVS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.8x 2.9x -18.9x PENN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -19.2% -37.3% -19.5% CHDN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -8.1%/yr -1.3%/yr -28.0%/yr LVS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.3% 31.5% 52.4% LVS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 80/100 49/100 LVS

Percentile Scorecard

CHDNLVSPENN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHDNLVSPENN
Valuation 61 #18 of 44 86 #7 of 44 65 #16 of 44
Growth 67 #15 of 43 81 #9 of 43 19 #35 of 43
Profitability 83 #8 of 42 95 #3 of 42 24 #32 of 42
Financial Health 19 #39 of 48 53 #23 of 48 43 #28 of 48
Shareholder Returns 19 #23 of 28 85 #5 of 28 93 #3 of 28
Overall 50 80 49
  • CHDN ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • LVS ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • PENN ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHDNLVSPENNSPY
1 month +4.1%-9.0%-6.8% -1.0%
3 months -3.2%-22.6%-29.2% +2.9%
6 months -17.5%-32.5%-15.9% +6.4%
Year to date -26.4%-45.2%-1.7% +11.4%
1 year -19.2%-37.3%-19.5% +13.1%
3 years -24.9%-25.1%-30.3% +79.4%
3 years, per year -9.1%-9.2%-11.3% +21.5%
5 years -34.3%-6.1%-80.6% +67.7%
5 years, per year -8.1%-1.3%-28.0% +10.9%
10 years +258.1%-37.6%+8.7% +255.2%
10 years, per year +13.6%-4.6%+0.8% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureCHDNLVSPENNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.3%31.5%52.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.4%35.6%46.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.500.581.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.56-1.18-0.37 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.4%-52.7%-84.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.8%-48.7%-34.3% -2.5%
52-week high $117.59$69.49$22.06 $779.14
52-week low $73.95$35.67$11.76 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHDNLVSPENN
P/E now vs peer median 14.2xmedian 17.0x 14.1xmedian 17.0x -2.1xmedian 17.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.9x 1.6xmedian 1.9x 0.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 10.5x 7.9xmedian 10.5x -38.4xmedian 10.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 11.2x 9.3xmedian 11.2x 20.2xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 2.5x -65.0xmedian 2.5x 1.0xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 1.69median 0.54 0.33median 0.54 0.04median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHDNLVSPENN
Revenue $2.99B $13.60B $7.16B
Gross profit $1.02B $6.46B $2.47B
Operating income $721.50M $2.85B -$565.10M
Net income $415.70M $1.81B -$908.20M
Free cash flow $567.90M $2.41B $96.10M
R&D – $180.00M –
EPS (diluted) $5.91 $2.52 $-6.61
Cash & equivalents $196.00M $2.86B $887.20M
Total debt $19.94B $62.21B $2.77B
Shares (diluted) 70.00M 640.00M 137.10M
Enterprise value $5.10B $9.94B -$949.77M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHDNLVSPENN
P/E 14.2x 14.1x -2.1x
P/FCF 10.3x 9.3x 20.2x
P/Operating cash flow 7.3x 6.4x 3.0x
P/S 2.0x 1.6x 0.3x
P/B 4.4x -65.0x 1.0x
P/Tangible book -5.0x -65.0x 4.1x
EV/EBITDA 10.9x 7.9x -38.4x
EV/EBIT 14.4x 12.3x -6.8x
EV/Revenue 3.5x 2.6x 0.5x
EV/FCF 18.3x 14.5x 39.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.1x 10.0x 5.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.69 0.33 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHDNLVSPENN
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.7% 10.9% 6.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.9% 16.6% 3.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.0% 5.5% 25.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 16.0% -2.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 1.0% 5.4% -504.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 19.7% 25.6% -39.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -4.1% 0.2% -1,067%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.2% 39.4% -47.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -1.0% 10.9% -1,203%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 42.3% -51.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.0% 27.5% 30.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.3% 18.1% -5.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 54.7% 86.1% 168.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 160.6% 23.5% -42.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHDNLVSPENN
Gross margin 34.2% 47.5% 34.6%
EBITDA margin 31.8% 32.4% -1.4%
Operating margin 24.1% 20.9% -7.9%
Pretax margin 19.6% 16.3% -12.9%
Net margin 13.8% 11.8% -12.7%
FCF margin 19.0% 17.7% 1.3%
Operating cash flow margin 26.6% 25.6% 9.1%
Return on equity 34.1% 656.1% -49.3%
Return on assets 5.5% 9.2% -6.4%
Return on invested capital 8.4% 14.9% -11.9%
Return on capital employed 11.7% 18.9% -4.5%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 1.9x -0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 0.5% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHDNLVSPENN
Debt / assets 63.5% 79.5% 19.7%
Debt / equity 3.6x -44.9x 1.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.8x 2.9x -18.9x
Debt / FCF 8.4x 6.4x 28.9x
Liabilities / assets 82.2% 101.8% 86.8%
Equity / assets 17.8% -1.8% 13.2%
Interest coverage 2.5x 3.8x –
Current ratio 0.4x 0.8x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.2x 0.8x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.6x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 1.39 2.18 0.31

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHDNLVSPENN
Dividend yield 0.5% 3.2% –
Net buyback yield 1.5% 12.2% 12.3%
Shareholder yield 2.0% 15.4% 12.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHDNLVSPENN
Forward P/E 11.8xFY2026 12.4xFY2026 17.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.11FY2026 $2.88FY2026 $0.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +16.0%FY2026 -4.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -3.8% +14.9% +85.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.17BFY2026 $14.54BFY2026 $7.14BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.2%FY2026 +11.7%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.4% +4.4% +1.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHDNLVSPENN
Held by institutions 85.5% 41.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 462 710 379
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.5% +0.1% +1.5%
Institutions buying 239 331 196
Institutions selling 146 290 109
Buyers to sellers 1.64 1.14 1.80

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHDNLVSPENN
CHDN 1.00 0.18 0.46
LVS 0.18 1.00 0.22
PENN 0.46 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHDN, LVS and PENN?

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Churchill Downs (CHDN) $5.88B, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) $23.34B, PENN Entertainment (PENN) $1.99B.

Which stock is cheaper, CHDN, LVS and PENN?

Churchill Downs (CHDN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Churchill Downs (CHDN) 14.2x, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 14.5x, PENN Entertainment (PENN) -2.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Churchill Downs (CHDN) is cheapest (Churchill Downs (CHDN) 11.8x, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 12.4x, PENN Entertainment (PENN) 17.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Churchill Downs (CHDN) +5.7%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) +10.9%, PENN Entertainment (PENN) +6.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Churchill Downs (CHDN) has the highest net margin (Churchill Downs (CHDN) 13.8%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 11.8%, PENN Entertainment (PENN) -12.7%). On return on invested capital, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) leads (Churchill Downs (CHDN) 8.4%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 14.9%, PENN Entertainment (PENN) -11.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Churchill Downs (CHDN) returned the most: Churchill Downs (CHDN) -19.2%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) -37.3%, PENN Entertainment (PENN) -19.5%. Over five years, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) compounded fastest (Churchill Downs (CHDN) -8.1%/yr, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) -1.3%/yr, PENN Entertainment (PENN) -28.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) has been the steadiest (Churchill Downs (CHDN) 34.3%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 31.5%, PENN Entertainment (PENN) 52.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHDN, LVS and PENN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.