CGC vs CURLF vs VRNO Stock Comparison

Canopy Growth, Curaleaf Holdings and Verano Holdings Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CGC Canopy Growth Corp
$0.67 -28.0% 1M -48.1% 1Y
Market cap
$286.08M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$271.79M
Div. yield
–
Cannabis Consumer Staples
2 wins
VRNO Verano Holdings Corp.
$5.10 -14.3% 1M -23.9% 1Y
Market cap
$377.49M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$835.52M
Div. yield
–
Cannabis Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Curaleaf Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Curaleaf Holdings 6, Canopy Growth 2, Verano Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCGCCURLFVRNOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $286.08M $2.25B $377.49M CURLF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.7x -70.4x -1.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 427.5x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.1% +3.0% -1.4% CGC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -62.1% -2.4% -30.9% CURLF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -17.7% 1.3% -12.3% CURLF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 2.4x -24.5x VRNO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -48.1% +1.1% -23.9% CURLF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -65.0%/yr -21.8%/yr -38.1%/yr CURLF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.9% 101.7% 120.0% CGC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 63/100 37/100 CURLF

Percentile Scorecard

CGCCURLFVRNO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCGCCURLFVRNO
Valuation 30 #27 of 38 60 #16 of 38 16 #32 of 38
Growth 88 #5 of 35 77 #9 of 35 24 #27 of 35
Profitability 14 #31 of 36 83 #7 of 36 46 #20 of 36
Financial Health 74 #11 of 39 47 #21 of 39 63 #15 of 39
Shareholder Returns 0 #13 of 13 50 #7 of 13 –
Overall 41 63 37
  • CGC ranked among 40 companies in Tobacco and Cannabis
  • CURLF ranked among 40 companies in Tobacco and Cannabis
  • VRNO ranked among 40 companies in Tobacco and Cannabis

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCGCCURLFVRNOSPY
1 month -28.0%-21.2%-14.3% +0.9%
3 months -24.7%+2.5%-1.4% +5.9%
6 months -38.5%-12.9%-17.7% +8.5%
Year to date -41.2%+13.1%-19.0% +13.3%
1 year -48.1%+1.1%-23.9% +12.4%
3 years -86.8%+2.5%-68.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year -49.1%+0.8%-32.1% +23.5%
5 years -99.5%-70.8%-90.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year -65.0%-21.8%-38.1% +11.0%
10 years -98.6%—— +263.4%
10 years, per year -34.6%—— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCGCCURLFVRNOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.9%101.7%120.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.3%99.5%113.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.231.740.94 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.640.01-0.20 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.6%-93.0%-96.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -65.1%-39.4%-41.4% -0.9%
52-week high $1.92$14.10$8.70 $779.14
52-week low $0.67$5.67$3.95 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCGCCURLFVRNO
P/E now vs peer median -1.7xmedian 16.6x -70.3xmedian 16.6x -1.4xmedian 16.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 0.9x 1.7xmedian 0.9x 2.6xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.3xmedian 12.9x 13.0xmedian 12.9x -200.6xmedian 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.7xmedian 23.3x 28.6xmedian 23.3x 48.5xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.0x 2.6xmedian 1.0x 3.3xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median -0.02median 0.57 -1.64median 0.57 0.02median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCGCCURLFVRNO
Revenue $271.79M $1.31B $835.52M
Gross profit $53.41M $650.50M $399.61M
Operating income -$117.01M $19.31M -$132.06M
Net income -$168.82M -$34.54M -$258.48M
Free cash flow -$60.26M $79.21M $45.68M
EPS (diluted) $-0.40 $-0.12 $-3.54
Cash & equivalents $236.91M $94.59M $85.20M
Total debt $169.05M $611.54M $392.61M
Shares (diluted) 422.26M 270.70M 73.01M
Enterprise value -$712.90M $1.85B $52.92M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCGCCURLFVRNO
P/E -1.7x -70.3x -1.4x
P/FCF -4.7x 28.6x 48.5x
P/Operating cash flow -5.0x 15.6x 24.8x
P/S 1.0x 1.7x 2.6x
P/B 0.6x 2.6x 3.3x
P/Tangible book 0.7x -25.5x 17.5x
EV/EBITDA -2.3x 13.0x -200.6x
EV/EBIT -1.8x 144.0x -19.1x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 2.1x 3.0x
EV/FCF -3.5x 35.1x 55.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -3.7x 19.2x 28.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.02 -1.64 0.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCGCCURLFVRNO
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.1% 3.0% -1.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.1% -0.8% -3.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.4% 3.6% -6.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 52.9% 3.2% -3.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -46.6% -3.9% 46.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 43.3% 29.6% -7.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 47.1% 85.0% 25.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 43.6% 56.8% 2.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 76.4% 87.3% -268.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 71.2% 42.7% -62.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 36.4% -5.8% 4.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 48.8% 16.3% -0.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 36.7% 1,173% 594.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 48.0% 45.9% 2.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCGCCURLFVRNO
Gross margin 19.7% 49.7% 47.8%
EBITDA margin -33.2% 16.4% -1.5%
Operating margin -43.1% 1.5% -15.8%
Pretax margin -62.2% -7.3% -24.5%
Net margin -62.1% -2.4% -30.9%
FCF margin -22.2% 6.1% 5.5%
Operating cash flow margin -20.9% 11.1% 10.7%
Return on equity -34.3% -3.8% -37.9%
Return on assets -21.4% -1.1% -15.2%
Return on invested capital -17.7% 1.3% -12.3%
Return on capital employed -17.4% 0.8% -8.3%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x -4.2x -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 3.3% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCGCCURLFVRNO
Debt / assets 21.8% 21.7% 23.1%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.7x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 2.4x -24.5x
Debt / FCF -2.8x 7.7x 8.6x
Liabilities / assets 37.6% 69.2% 60.2%
Equity / assets 62.4% 30.8% 39.8%
Interest coverage -3.9x – –
Current ratio 3.0x 1.5x 3.7x
Quick ratio 2.3x 0.6x 1.0x
Cash ratio 2.0x 0.3x 0.8x
Altman Z-score -13.34 0.50 0.86

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCGCCURLFVRNO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -85.8% -0.1% –
Shareholder yield -85.8% -0.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCGCCURLFVRNO
Forward P/E – 427.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.10FY2026 $0.02FY2026 $-0.54FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -1,500.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $252.42MFY2026 $1.41BFY2026 $807.61MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +23.4%FY2026 +10.9%FY2026 -1.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.6% +0.6% +9.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCGCCURLFVRNO
Held by institutions 7.0% 0.0% 0.2%
Institutions holding 215 2 1
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% -86.3% –
Institutions buying 74 1 0
Institutions selling 32 1 1
Buyers to sellers 2.31 1.00 0.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CGCCURLFVRNO
CGC 1.00 0.66 0.62
CURLF 0.66 1.00 0.79
VRNO 0.62 0.79 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CGC, CURLF and VRNO?

Curaleaf Holdings (CURLF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Canopy Growth (CGC) $286.08M, Curaleaf Holdings (CURLF) $2.25B, Verano Holdings (VRNO) $377.49M.

Which company is growing faster?

Canopy Growth (CGC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Canopy Growth (CGC) +13.1%, Curaleaf Holdings (CURLF) +3.0%, Verano Holdings (VRNO) -1.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Curaleaf Holdings (CURLF) has the highest net margin (Canopy Growth (CGC) -62.1%, Curaleaf Holdings (CURLF) -2.4%, Verano Holdings (VRNO) -30.9%). On return on invested capital, Curaleaf Holdings (CURLF) leads (Canopy Growth (CGC) -17.7%, Curaleaf Holdings (CURLF) 1.3%, Verano Holdings (VRNO) -12.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Curaleaf Holdings (CURLF) returned the most: Canopy Growth (CGC) -48.1%, Curaleaf Holdings (CURLF) +1.1%, Verano Holdings (VRNO) -23.9%. Over five years, Curaleaf Holdings (CURLF) compounded fastest (Canopy Growth (CGC) -65.0%/yr, Curaleaf Holdings (CURLF) -21.8%/yr, Verano Holdings (VRNO) -38.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Canopy Growth (CGC) has been the steadiest (Canopy Growth (CGC) 74.9%, Curaleaf Holdings (CURLF) 101.7%, Verano Holdings (VRNO) 120.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CGC, CURLF and VRNO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Curaleaf Holdings (CURLF) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.