CDW vs CLMB vs CNXN Stock Comparison

Cdw, Climb Global Solutions and Pc Connection Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CDW CDW Corp
$161.41 +19.2% 1M +1.4% 1Y
Market cap
$20.63B
P/E
19.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$23.50B
Div. yield
0.02%
Technology Distribution Technology
4 wins
CNXN Pc Connection Inc
$88.58 -0.8% 1M +42.7% 1Y
Market cap
$2.18B
P/E
22.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.99B
Div. yield
–
Technology Distribution Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Cdw leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Cdw 4, Climb Global Solutions 4, Pc Connection 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCDWCLMBCNXNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $20.63B $597.73M $2.18B CDW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.1x 29.1x 22.7x CDW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.8x 24.0x 21.7x CDW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.4% +23.1% +3.2% CLMB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.6% 2.9% 3.2% CDW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.2% 16.9% — CLMB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.8x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1.4% -1.5% +42.7% CNXN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.8%/yr +37.1%/yr +14.9%/yr CLMB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.7% 51.1% 25.9% CNXN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 47/100 44/100 CLMB

Percentile Scorecard

CDWCLMBCNXN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCDWCLMBCNXN
Valuation 22 #39 of 50 41 #30 of 50 31 #35 of 50
Growth 25 #34 of 45 80 #10 of 45 30 #32 of 45
Profitability 73 #12 of 41 68 #14 of 41 55 #19 of 41
Financial Health 12 #55 of 62 36 #40 of 62 80 #13 of 62
Shareholder Returns 69 #10 of 30 10 #27 of 30 24 #23 of 30
Overall 40 47 44
  • CDW ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • CLMB ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • CNXN ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCDWCLMBCNXNSPY
1 month +19.2%+1.6%-0.8% -0.2%
3 months +12.1%+14.1%+6.5% +3.9%
6 months +21.4%+51.8%+39.2% +8.2%
Year to date +18.5%+25.1%+53.4% +12.9%
1 year +1.4%-1.5%+42.7% +12.3%
3 years -18.8%+195.3%+68.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -6.7%+43.5%+19.1% +23.3%
5 years -13.2%+384.3%+100.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year -2.8%+37.1%+14.9% +10.9%
10 years +260.5%+644.4%+264.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year +13.7%+22.2%+13.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCDWCLMBCNXNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.7%51.1%25.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.0%57.4%25.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.720.570.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.03-0.031.65 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.5%-53.5%-30.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.2%-4.7%-7.0% -1.2%
52-week high $165.11$33.75$95.22 $779.14
52-week low $99.30$16.68$55.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCDWCLMBCNXN
P/E now vs peer median 19.0xmedian 17.4x 28.7xmedian 17.4x 23.3xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.7x 0.8xmedian 0.7x 0.7xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.0xmedian 10.7x 15.2xmedian 10.7x 14.8xmedian 10.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 23.5xmedian 11.5x 14.6xmedian 11.5x 65.7xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 8.3xmedian 1.4x 4.8xmedian 1.4x 2.3xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 8.22median 1.51 1.51median 1.51 2.45median 1.51

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCDWCLMBCNXN
Revenue $23.50B $711.77M $2.99B
Gross profit $5.02B $112.22M $564.46M
Operating income $1.68B $27.73M $117.10M
Net income $1.08B $20.53M $95.84M
Free cash flow $860.20M $41.00M $34.05M
EPS (diluted) $8.48 $1.12 $3.78
Cash & equivalents $361.80M $56.56M $123.72M
Total debt $5.82B – –
Shares (diluted) 127.40M 18.30M 25.34M
Enterprise value $18.62B $412.99M $617.73M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCDWCLMBCNXN
P/E 19.0x 28.7x 23.3x
P/FCF 23.5x 14.6x 65.7x
P/Operating cash flow 20.6x 14.1x 53.2x
P/S 0.9x 0.8x 0.7x
P/B 8.3x 4.8x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 15.0x 6.6x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 13.0x 15.2x 14.8x
EV/EBIT 15.3x 19.6x 16.2x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 0.8x 0.6x
EV/FCF 29.9x 13.3x 55.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.2x 12.8x 45.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 8.22 1.51 2.45

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCDWCLMBCNXN
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.4% 23.1% 3.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.6% 29.0% 0.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 6.4% 6.7% 6.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.3% 24.2% 3.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 0.4% -15.9% 19.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.0% 21.2% 5.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 0.3% -7.1% 11.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.1% 20.6% 8.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 4.3% -8.2% 12.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.3% 19.0% 9.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -13.2% 127.9% -19.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.6% 8.9% -38.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -15.6% 189.6% -23.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.9% 13.5% -41.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCDWCLMBCNXN
Gross margin 21.4% 15.8% 18.9%
EBITDA margin 8.4% 5.0% 4.3%
Operating margin 7.1% 3.9% 3.9%
Pretax margin 6.2% 3.9% 4.4%
Net margin 4.6% 2.9% 3.2%
FCF margin 3.7% 5.8% 1.1%
Operating cash flow margin 4.2% 6.0% 1.4%
Return on equity 43.2% 16.9% 10.2%
Return on assets 6.4% 4.5% 6.7%
Return on invested capital 15.2% 16.9% –
Return on capital employed 19.6% 20.9% 12.0%
Asset turnover 1.4x 1.5x 2.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 2.1x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.4% 0.7% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCDWCLMBCNXN
Debt / assets 33.7% – –
Debt / equity 2.4x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.8x – –
Debt / FCF 6.8x – –
Liabilities / assets 85.8% 73.0% 33.3%
Equity / assets 14.2% 27.0% 66.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.1x 2.9x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.1x 2.4x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 2.48 3.20 6.83

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCDWCLMBCNXN
Dividend yield 1.6% 0.1% 0.8%
Net buyback yield 4.1% 0.4% 0.8%
Shareholder yield 5.7% 0.5% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 30.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 37.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -2.0% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 1.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCDWCLMBCNXN
Forward P/E 13.8xFY2026 24.0xFY2026 21.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $11.73FY2026 $1.34FY2026 $4.08FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.1%FY2026 +5.5%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +7.4% +39.6% +2.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $22.80BFY2026 $714.50MFY2026 $2.93BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.7%FY2026 +9.5%FY2026 +2.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.2% +5.9% +4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCDWCLMBCNXN
Held by institutions 100.0% 80.1% 41.2%
Institutions holding 752 134 187
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.2% +3.3% -0.3%
Institutions buying 370 75 98
Institutions selling 295 45 61
Buyers to sellers 1.25 1.67 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CDWCLMBCNXN
CDW 1.00 0.23 0.46
CLMB 0.23 1.00 0.31
CNXN 0.46 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CDW, CLMB and CNXN?

Cdw (CDW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cdw (CDW) $20.63B, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) $597.73M, Pc Connection (CNXN) $2.18B.

Which stock is cheaper, CDW, CLMB and CNXN?

Cdw (CDW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cdw (CDW) 19.1x, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 29.1x, Pc Connection (CNXN) 22.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cdw (CDW) is cheapest (Cdw (CDW) 13.8x, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 24.0x, Pc Connection (CNXN) 21.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cdw (CDW) +7.4%, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) +23.1%, Pc Connection (CNXN) +3.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cdw (CDW) has the highest net margin (Cdw (CDW) 4.6%, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 2.9%, Pc Connection (CNXN) 3.2%). On return on invested capital, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) leads (Cdw (CDW) 15.2%, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 16.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Pc Connection (CNXN) returned the most: Cdw (CDW) +1.4%, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) -1.5%, Pc Connection (CNXN) +42.7%. Over five years, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) compounded fastest (Cdw (CDW) -2.8%/yr, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) +37.1%/yr, Pc Connection (CNXN) +14.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cdw (CDW) 0.02%, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 0.00%, Pc Connection (CNXN) 0.00%. Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Pc Connection (CNXN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Pc Connection (CNXN) has been the steadiest (Cdw (CDW) 47.7%, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 51.1%, Pc Connection (CNXN) 25.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CDW, CLMB and CNXN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cdw (CDW) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.