CCS vs GRBK vs NVR Stock Comparison

Century Communities, Green Brick Partners and Nvr Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CCS Century Communities, Inc.
$57.46 -8.3% 1M -9.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.65B
P/E
12.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.93B
Div. yield
0.02%
Homebuilders Consumer Discretionary
1 win
NVR Nvr Inc
$5,729.89 -9.0% 1M -22.9% 1Y
Market cap
$15.54B
P/E
14.8x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Homebuilders Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Green Brick Partners leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Green Brick Partners 8, Nvr 2, Century Communities 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCCSGRBKNVRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.65B $2.76B $15.54B NVR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.3x 9.5x 14.8x GRBK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.8x 10.4x 15.6x GRBK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -8.9% -5.7% — GRBK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.4% 14.7% — GRBK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -53.1% 13.4% — GRBK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 0.4x — CCS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -9.0% -5.8% -22.9% GRBK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.0%/yr +20.8%/yr +3.5%/yr GRBK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.8% 33.6% 28.1% NVR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 61/100 — GRBK

Percentile Scorecard

CCSGRBKNVR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCCSGRBKNVR
Valuation 40 #13 of 21 50 #11 of 21 10 #19 of 21
Growth 58 #9 of 20 84 #4 of 20 –
Profitability 6 #17 of 18 77 #5 of 18 –
Financial Health 24 #14 of 18 77 #5 of 18 –
Shareholder Returns 75 #5 of 17 19 #14 of 17 –
Overall 40 61 –
  • CCS ranked among 24 companies in Homebuilding
  • GRBK ranked among 24 companies in Homebuilding
  • NVR ranked among 24 companies in Homebuilding

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCCSGRBKNVRSPY
1 month -8.3%-6.8%-9.0% -0.8%
3 months -18.5%-11.5%-9.1% +3.5%
6 months -2.5%-9.5%-11.6% +7.0%
Year to date -3.2%+2.3%-21.4% +12.2%
1 year -9.0%-5.8%-22.9% +13.0%
3 years -5.6%+67.1%+6.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year -1.9%+18.7%+2.1% +23.1%
5 years -9.4%+157.6%+19.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year -2.0%+20.8%+3.5% +11.0%
10 years +181.0%+716.7%+271.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +10.9%+23.4%+14.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCCSGRBKNVRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.8%33.6%28.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.9%30.3%28.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.930.840.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.22-0.17-0.81 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.7%-45.1%-43.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.2%-20.4%-29.2% -1.8%
52-week high $74.84$80.59$8,097.25 $779.14
52-week low $48.41$60.10$5,563.62 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCCSGRBKNVR
P/E now vs peer median 12.3xmedian 12.7x 9.5xmedian 12.7x 14.8xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.6x 1.4xmedian 0.6x 1.7xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.1xmedian 9.4x 7.5xmedian 9.4x —median 9.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 46.6xmedian 16.0x 24.7xmedian 16.0x 15.9xmedian 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.1x 1.4xmedian 1.1x 4.4xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median -0.58median 1.06 2.03median 1.06 -1.91median 1.06

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCCSGRBKNVR
Revenue $3.93B $1.98B –
Gross profit -$2.43B $606.74M –
Operating income -$2.92B $383.06M –
Net income $133.92M $314.87M –
Free cash flow $35.03M $111.62M –
EPS (diluted) $4.67 $6.73 $371.85
Cash & equivalents $92.33M $131.64M –
Total debt $1.68B $1.14B –
Shares (diluted) 28.65M 43.28M 2.82M
Enterprise value $1.24B $2.18B $15.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCCSGRBKNVR
P/E 12.3x 9.5x 14.8x
P/FCF 46.6x 24.7x 15.9x
P/Operating cash flow 23.9x 23.5x –
P/S 0.4x 1.4x 1.7x
P/B 0.6x 1.4x 4.4x
P/Tangible book 0.6x 1.4x 4.4x
EV/EBITDA -1.1x 7.5x –
EV/EBIT -1.1x 7.6x –
EV/Revenue 0.8x 1.5x –
EV/FCF 92.1x 26.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow 47.2x 24.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.58 2.03 -1.91

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCCSGRBKNVR
Revenue growth (1Y) -8.9% -5.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.1% 4.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.4% -11.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.1% 5.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.7% -16.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -3.6% 5.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) -48.5% -18.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -24.3% 2.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) -44.8% -15.7% -20.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -21.3% 4.7% -7.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -56.4% -29.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -50.1% -22.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -73.3% -31.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -59.6% -23.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCCSGRBKNVR
Gross margin -61.7% 30.6% –
EBITDA margin -73.8% 19.6% –
Operating margin -74.4% 19.3% –
Pretax margin 4.5% 20.4% –
Net margin 3.4% 14.7% –
FCF margin 0.9% 5.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 1.7% 5.9% –
Return on equity 5.2% 16.0% –
Return on assets 2.9% 12.3% –
Return on invested capital -53.1% 13.4% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x 0.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCCSGRBKNVR
Debt / assets 35.9% 11.0% –
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 0.4x –
Debt / FCF 48.1x 2.6x –
Liabilities / assets 45.3% 23.6% 38.3%
Equity / assets 54.7% 76.4% 61.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCCSGRBKNVR
Dividend yield 2.2% – –
Net buyback yield 6.1% 1.4% –
Shareholder yield 8.3% 1.4% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 26.5% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 101.4% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.5% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.8% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCCSGRBKNVR
Forward P/E 11.8xFY2026 10.4xFY2026 15.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.86FY2026 $6.18FY2026 $366.66FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -18.9%FY2026 -12.6%FY2026 -16.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.7% -9.1% +3.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.02BFY2026 $1.96BFY2026 $9.90BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -2.5%FY2026 -6.8%FY2026 -4.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -8.4% -8.5% -6.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCCSGRBKNVR
Held by institutions 91.9% 80.4% 88.3%
Institutions holding 263 324 683
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +1.4% +3.2%
Institutions buying 117 170 328
Institutions selling 109 91 237
Buyers to sellers 1.07 1.87 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CCSGRBKNVR
CCS 1.00 0.82 0.67
GRBK 0.82 1.00 0.69
NVR 0.67 0.69 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CCS, GRBK and NVR?

Nvr (NVR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Century Communities (CCS) $1.65B, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) $2.76B, Nvr (NVR) $15.54B.

Which stock is cheaper, CCS, GRBK and NVR?

Green Brick Partners (GRBK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Century Communities (CCS) 12.3x, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) 9.5x, Nvr (NVR) 14.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) is cheapest (Century Communities (CCS) 11.8x, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) 10.4x, Nvr (NVR) 15.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Green Brick Partners (GRBK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Century Communities (CCS) -8.9%, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) -5.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Green Brick Partners (GRBK) has the highest net margin (Century Communities (CCS) 3.4%, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) 14.7%). On return on invested capital, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) leads (Century Communities (CCS) -53.1%, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) 13.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Green Brick Partners (GRBK) returned the most: Century Communities (CCS) -9.0%, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) -5.8%, Nvr (NVR) -22.9%. Over five years, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) compounded fastest (Century Communities (CCS) -2.0%/yr, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) +20.8%/yr, Nvr (NVR) +3.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Century Communities (CCS) 0.02%, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) 0.00%, Nvr (NVR) 0.00%. Green Brick Partners (GRBK) and Nvr (NVR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nvr (NVR) has been the steadiest (Century Communities (CCS) 41.8%, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) 33.6%, Nvr (NVR) 28.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CCS, GRBK and NVR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Green Brick Partners (GRBK) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.