CCEP vs MNST vs PRMB Stock Comparison

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners, Monster Beverage and Primo Brands Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MNST Monster Beverage Corp
$46.19 +5.2% 1M -33.9% 1Y
Market cap
$90.91B
P/E
42.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.22B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
4 wins
PRMB Primo Brands Corp
$19.68 -0.4% 1M -11.7% 1Y
Market cap
$7.14B
P/E
71.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.74B
Div. yield
0.02%
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Monster Beverage leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Monster Beverage 4, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners 4, Primo Brands 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCCEPMNSTPRMBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $51.19B $90.91B $7.14B MNST
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.0x 42.7x 71.1x CCEP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.7x 38.5x 15.3x PRMB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +20.4% +11.5% MNST
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 23.1% 1.5% MNST
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 3.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 4.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +21.4% -33.9% -11.7% CCEP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.0%/yr +1.7%/yr +4.3%/yr CCEP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.9% 73.5% 51.1% CCEP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 61/100 59/100 MNST

Percentile Scorecard

CCEPMNSTPRMB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCCEPMNSTPRMB
Valuation 51 #19 of 38 16 #32 of 38 70 #12 of 38
Growth – 69 #11 of 33 75 #9 of 33
Profitability – 94 #3 of 32 55 #15 of 32
Financial Health 19 #31 of 38 97 #2 of 38 22 #30 of 38
Shareholder Returns 35 #16 of 24 30 #17 of 24 74 #7 of 24
Overall 35 61 59
  • CCEP ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • MNST ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • PRMB ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCCEPMNSTPRMBSPY
1 month +11.2%+5.2%-0.4% -1.0%
3 months +5.5%-50.6%-13.3% +2.9%
6 months +13.0%-41.0%-3.5% +6.4%
Year to date +22.2%-39.8%+20.4% +11.4%
1 year +21.4%-33.9%-11.7% +13.1%
3 years +89.0%-7.7%+47.2% +79.4%
3 years, per year +23.6%-2.6%+13.8% +21.5%
5 years +109.7%+9.0%+23.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year +16.0%+1.7%+4.3% +10.9%
10 years +193.0%+88.2%+40.1% +255.2%
10 years, per year +11.4%+6.5%+3.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureCCEPMNSTPRMBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.9%73.5%51.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.5%105.6%57.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.120.320.88 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.90-0.46-0.23 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.6%-58.4%-59.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.0%-53.8%-22.5% -2.5%
52-week high $114.23$99.94$25.40 $779.14
52-week low $85.43$41.62$14.46 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCCEPMNSTPRMB
P/E now vs peer median 23.0xmedian 27.0x 42.5xmedian 27.0x 71.2xmedian 27.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 1.6x 9.8xmedian 1.6x 1.1xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.4x 31.0xmedian 14.4x 10.5xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.0xmedian 18.3x 43.1xmedian 18.3x 19.5xmedian 18.3x
P/B now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 2.8x 9.7xmedian 2.8x 2.4xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 2.03 2.54median 2.03 —median 2.03

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCCEPMNSTPRMB
Revenue – $9.22B $6.74B
Gross profit – $5.12B $1.97B
Operating income – $2.69B $482.70M
Net income – $2.13B $100.30M
Free cash flow – $2.10B $366.70M
EPS (diluted) – $1.08 $0.27
Cash & equivalents $1.08B $2.19B $366.80M
Total debt $52.19B – –
Shares (diluted) 456.00M 1.98B 365.67M
Enterprise value $43.86B $79.16B $5.68B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCCEPMNSTPRMB
P/E 23.0x 42.5x 71.2x
P/FCF 20.0x 43.1x 19.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 40.4x 8.7x
P/S 2.1x 9.8x 1.1x
P/B 5.4x 9.7x 2.4x
P/Tangible book -9.1x 11.3x 104.9x
EV/EBITDA – 31.0x 10.5x
EV/EBIT – 32.4x 24.7x
EV/Revenue – 9.4x 1.8x
EV/FCF – 41.5x 32.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 38.9x 14.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.54 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCCEPMNSTPRMB
Revenue growth (1Y) – 20.4% 11.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 11.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 21.2% 3.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 13.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 30.3% 40.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 13.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 35.2% 308.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 14.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 34.6% 314.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 16.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 9.0% 49.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 13.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 13.1% 5.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 15.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCCEPMNSTPRMB
Gross margin – 55.5% 29.2%
EBITDA margin – 30.5% 16.8%
Operating margin – 29.2% 7.2%
Pretax margin – 30.1% 2.7%
Net margin – 23.1% 1.5%
FCF margin – 22.8% 5.4%
Operating cash flow margin – 24.3% 12.1%
Return on equity – 23.5% 3.4%
Return on assets – 19.1% 0.9%
Return on invested capital – – 3.6%
Return on capital employed – 28.6% 5.2%
Asset turnover – 0.8x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.1x 8.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.5% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCCEPMNSTPRMB
Debt / assets 35.8% – 48.5%
Debt / equity 1.4x – 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 4.2x
Debt / FCF – – 14.1x
Liabilities / assets 73.8% 17.7% 72.0%
Equity / assets 26.2% 82.3% 28.0%
Interest coverage – – 1.5x
Current ratio 0.8x 3.7x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.5x 3.1x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x 2.0x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – 30.28 1.08

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCCEPMNSTPRMB
Dividend yield 2.0% – 2.3%
Net buyback yield – 0.1% 3.3%
Shareholder yield 2.0% 0.1% 5.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 162.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 44.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 14.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCCEPMNSTPRMB
Forward P/E 22.7xFY2026 38.5xFY2026 15.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.89FY2026 $1.20FY2026 $1.29FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1.2%FY2026 +16.5%FY2026 -3.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +7.0% +5.8% +7.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.85BFY2026 $10.20BFY2026 $6.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.3%FY2026 +23.0%FY2026 -4.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -8.2% +2.2% +6.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCCEPMNSTPRMB
Held by institutions 33.8% 67.5% 100.0%
Institutions holding 576 1,359 385
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.2% +2.9% +0.6%
Institutions buying 268 738 214
Institutions selling 219 456 124
Buyers to sellers 1.22 1.62 1.73

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CCEPMNSTPRMB
CCEP 1.00 0.26 0.15
MNST 0.26 1.00 0.08
PRMB 0.15 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CCEP, MNST and PRMB?

Monster Beverage (MNST) is the largest by market capitalisation: Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) $51.19B, Monster Beverage (MNST) $90.91B, Primo Brands (PRMB) $7.14B.

Which stock is cheaper, CCEP, MNST and PRMB?

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) 23.0x, Monster Beverage (MNST) 42.7x, Primo Brands (PRMB) 71.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Primo Brands (PRMB) is cheapest (Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) 22.7x, Monster Beverage (MNST) 38.5x, Primo Brands (PRMB) 15.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Monster Beverage (MNST) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Monster Beverage (MNST) +20.4%, Primo Brands (PRMB) +11.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Monster Beverage (MNST) has the highest net margin (Monster Beverage (MNST) 23.1%, Primo Brands (PRMB) 1.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) returned the most: Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) +21.4%, Monster Beverage (MNST) -33.9%, Primo Brands (PRMB) -11.7%. Over five years, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) compounded fastest (Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) +16.0%/yr, Monster Beverage (MNST) +1.7%/yr, Primo Brands (PRMB) +4.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) 0.00%, Monster Beverage (MNST) 0.00%, Primo Brands (PRMB) 0.02%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) and Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) has been the steadiest (Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) 23.9%, Monster Beverage (MNST) 73.5%, Primo Brands (PRMB) 51.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CCEP, MNST and PRMB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Monster Beverage (MNST) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.