CBUS vs NTR vs SNES Stock Comparison

Cibus, Nutrien and SenesTech Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CBUS Cibus, Inc.
$1.41 -8.4% 1M -10.8% 1Y
Market cap
$107.46M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.60M
Div. yield
–
Crop Protection and Seeds Basic Materials
1 win
NTR Nutrien Ltd.
$69.73 -7.2% 1M +20.6% 1Y
Market cap
$33.25B
P/E
14.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.21B
Div. yield
–
Fertilizers Basic Materials
7 wins
SNES SenesTech, Inc.
$0.84 +7.7% 1M -77.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.44M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.37M
Div. yield
–
Crop Protection and Seeds Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Nutrien leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Nutrien 7, SenesTech 1, Cibus 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCBUSNTRSNESLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $107.46M $33.25B $4.44M NTR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.0x 14.9x -0.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -25.7% +8.6% +13.4% SNES
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2,843.7% 7.9% -294.7% NTR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -362.3% 11.8% — NTR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 1.3x 0.7x CBUS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.8% +20.6% -77.4% NTR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -60.1%/yr -0.1%/yr -81.2%/yr NTR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 105.7% 33.0% 84.8% NTR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 30/100 68/100 48/100 NTR

Percentile Scorecard

CBUSNTRSNES

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCBUSNTRSNES
Valuation 1 #93 of 94 90 #10 of 94 25 #71 of 94
Growth 70 #28 of 92 58 #39 of 92 77 #22 of 92
Profitability 2 #87 of 89 76 #22 of 89 11 #79 of 89
Financial Health 45 #54 of 97 80 #20 of 97 77 #23 of 97
Shareholder Returns – 36 #45 of 70 –
Overall 30 68 48
  • CBUS ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • NTR ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • SNES ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCBUSNTRSNESSPY
1 month -8.4%-7.2%+7.7% -1.0%
3 months -17.1%+2.4%-39.6% +2.9%
6 months -6.0%-2.6%-46.5% +6.4%
Year to date -19.0%+13.0%-60.7% +11.4%
1 year -10.8%+20.6%-77.4% +13.1%
3 years -89.8%+22.9%-97.9% +79.4%
3 years, per year -53.3%+7.1%-72.6% +21.5%
5 years -99.0%-0.5%-100.0% +67.7%
5 years, per year -60.1%-0.1%-81.2% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureCBUSNTRSNESSPY
Volatility, 1Y 105.7%33.0%84.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 105.9%34.5%79.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.01-0.231.51 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.100.62-0.91 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.4%-61.5%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -65.2%-16.9%-77.7% -2.5%
52-week high $4.05$83.94$3.76 $779.14
52-week low $1.16$53.64$0.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCBUSNTRSNES
P/E now vs peer median -1.1xmedian 21.5x 15.2xmedian 21.5x -0.6xmedian 21.5x
P/S now vs peer median 29.9xmedian 1.4x 1.2xmedian 1.4x 1.9xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.4xmedian 12.4x 5.6xmedian 12.4x 0.1xmedian 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.5x 5.4xmedian 15.5x -0.7xmedian 15.5x
P/B now vs peer median 7.3xmedian 1.6x 1.3xmedian 1.6x 0.7xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median -0.03median 1.70 -1.17median 1.70 -0.01median 1.70

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCBUSNTRSNES
Revenue $3.60M $28.21B $2.37M
Gross profit – $8.75B $1.57M
Operating income -$68.88M $5.49B -$7.21M
Net income -$104.91M $5.57B -$7.00M
Free cash flow – $6.28B -$6.74M
R&D $40.91M – $1.65M
EPS (diluted) $-1.33 $4.59 $-1.32
Cash & equivalents $20.43M $921.00M $5.08M
Total debt $3.26M $11.39B $793.00K
Shares (diluted) 76.76M 486.52M 5.30M
Enterprise value $16.71M $30.08B -$26.32M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCBUSNTRSNES
P/E -1.1x 15.2x -0.6x
P/FCF – 5.4x -0.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 8.0x -0.7x
P/S 29.9x 1.2x 1.9x
P/B 7.3x 1.3x 0.7x
P/Tangible book -6.7x 1.4x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA -1.4x 5.6x 0.1x
EV/EBIT -1.3x 8.0x 0.1x
EV/Revenue 24.5x 1.6x -0.2x
EV/FCF – 7.0x 0.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – 10.5x 0.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.03 -1.17 -0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCBUSNTRSNES
Revenue growth (1Y) -25.7% 8.6% 13.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 123.4% -5.6% 29.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 15.5% 17.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -8.0% 49.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 75.2% 140.9% -18.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -27.4% -20.1% 6.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 65.4% 77.9% -15.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -44.6% 14.3% 7.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 79.8% 86.8% 59.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 37.1% -13.0% 84.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 14.0% -25.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -15.8% 6.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 10.8% -23.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -13.9% 6.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCBUSNTRSNES
Gross margin – 31.0% 66.2%
EBITDA margin -1,776% 28.0% -298.5%
Operating margin -1,914% 19.5% -303.7%
Pretax margin -2,915% 13.7% -294.7%
Net margin -2,844% 7.9% -294.7%
FCF margin – 22.3% -283.7%
Operating cash flow margin – 14.8% -281.4%
Return on equity -572.8% 9.4% -101.8%
Return on assets -33.9% 4.5% -68.3%
Return on invested capital -362.3% 11.8% –
Return on capital employed -23.4% – -78.0%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% 12.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCBUSNTRSNES
Debt / assets 0.3% 21.3% 1.9%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.4x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 1.3x 0.7x
Debt / FCF – 1.8x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 95.3% 51.6% 35.8%
Equity / assets 4.7% 48.4% 64.2%
Interest coverage – 7.8x -360.5x
Current ratio 1.6x – 6.8x
Quick ratio 1.5x – 5.4x
Cash ratio 1.4x – 5.1x
Altman Z-score -4.49 – -22.50

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCBUSNTRSNES
Dividend yield – 3.2% –
Net buyback yield – -1.6% -129.8%
Shareholder yield – 1.6% -129.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCBUSNTRSNES
Forward P/E – 14.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.89FY2026 $4.99FY2026 $-1.34FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +9.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +2.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.03MFY2026 $28.81BFY2026 $3.06MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +38.2%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026 +37.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +131.2% -11.6% +49.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCBUSNTRSNES
Held by institutions 24.1% 63.7% –
Institutions holding 62 727 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -15.6% -0.5% –
Institutions buying 30 367 –
Institutions selling 13 236 –
Buyers to sellers 2.31 1.56 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CBUSNTRSNES
CBUS 1.00 0.09 0.08
NTR 0.09 1.00 -0.13
SNES 0.08 -0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CBUS, NTR and SNES?

Nutrien (NTR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cibus (CBUS) $107.46M, Nutrien (NTR) $33.25B, SenesTech (SNES) $4.44M.

Which company is growing faster?

SenesTech (SNES) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cibus (CBUS) -25.7%, Nutrien (NTR) +8.6%, SenesTech (SNES) +13.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nutrien (NTR) has the highest net margin (Cibus (CBUS) -2,843.7%, Nutrien (NTR) 7.9%, SenesTech (SNES) -294.7%). On return on invested capital, Nutrien (NTR) leads (Cibus (CBUS) -362.3%, Nutrien (NTR) 11.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nutrien (NTR) returned the most: Cibus (CBUS) -10.8%, Nutrien (NTR) +20.6%, SenesTech (SNES) -77.4%. Over five years, Nutrien (NTR) compounded fastest (Cibus (CBUS) -60.1%/yr, Nutrien (NTR) -0.1%/yr, SenesTech (SNES) -81.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nutrien (NTR) has been the steadiest (Cibus (CBUS) 105.7%, Nutrien (NTR) 33.0%, SenesTech (SNES) 84.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CBUS, NTR and SNES?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nutrien (NTR) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.