CBLL vs GEHC vs LNTH Stock Comparison

Ceribell, GE HealthCare Technologies and Lantheus Holdings Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CBLL Ceribell, Inc.
$27.13 +14.9% 1M +109.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.03B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$101.96M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
2 wins
LNTH Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
$99.80 -0.2% 1M +76.6% 1Y
Market cap
$6.51B
P/E
23.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.56B
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Lantheus Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Lantheus Holdings 5, GE HealthCare Technologies 3, Ceribell 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCBLLGEHCLNTHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.03B $32.60B $6.51B GEHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -15.6x 16.4x 23.7x GEHC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.0x 17.3x GEHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +31.7% +6.5% +2.3% CBLL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -64.7% 9.3% 17.7% LNTH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.1% 12.5% LNTH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 2.4x -0.1x LNTH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +109.7% -7.5% +76.6% CBLL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +34.5%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.1% 34.9% 32.5% LNTH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 38/100 55/100 80/100 LNTH

Percentile Scorecard

CBLLGEHCLNTH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCBLLGEHCLNTH
Valuation 22 #179 of 228 88 #29 of 228 80 #46 of 228
Growth 20 #177 of 222 22 #173 of 222 62 #84 of 222
Profitability 36 #134 of 210 77 #49 of 210 94 #13 of 210
Financial Health 81 #46 of 241 27 #177 of 241 70 #74 of 241
Shareholder Returns 30 #97 of 138 61 #55 of 138 93 #11 of 138
Overall 38 55 80
  • CBLL ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • GEHC ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • LNTH ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCBLLGEHCLNTHSPY
1 month +14.9%+8.1%-0.2% -1.0%
3 months +60.4%+17.9%-4.8% +2.9%
6 months +28.1%+3.8%+18.3% +6.4%
Year to date +23.7%-12.9%+50.0% +11.4%
1 year +109.7%-7.5%+76.6% +13.1%
3 years —+10.5%+45.7% +79.4%
3 years, per year —+3.4%+13.4% +21.5%
5 years ——+339.3% +67.7%
5 years, per year ——+34.5% +10.9%
10 years ——+1,002.8% +255.2%
10 years, per year ——+27.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureCBLLGEHCLNTHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.1%34.9%32.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 49.5%36.0%27.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.200.670.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.10-0.222.36 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.9%-37.4%-59.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.0%-19.0%-10.0% -2.5%
52-week high $27.68$88.16$110.94 $779.14
52-week low $10.92$59.49$50.69 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCBLLGEHCLNTH
P/E now vs peer median -15.6xmedian 30.7x 16.3xmedian 30.7x 23.6xmedian 30.7x
P/S now vs peer median 10.2xmedian 3.0x 1.5xmedian 3.0x 4.2xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -13.6xmedian 17.7x 12.0xmedian 17.7x 16.4xmedian 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -19.0xmedian 23.7x 20.4xmedian 23.7x 16.8xmedian 23.7x
P/B now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 2.4x 2.9xmedian 2.4x 5.0xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.96 2.43median 0.96 0.22median 0.96

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCBLLGEHCLNTH
Revenue $101.96M $21.27B $1.56B
Gross profit $90.65M $8.41B $936.02M
Operating income -$69.97M $2.73B $302.34M
Net income -$66.00M $2.05B $275.31M
Free cash flow -$54.72M $1.58B $387.83M
R&D $22.95M $1.28B $173.09M
EPS (diluted) $-1.74 $4.37 $4.08
Cash & equivalents $32.66M $2.11B $593.30M
Total debt $79.45M $10.09B $571.05M
Shares (diluted) 38.03M 454.00M 67.52M
Enterprise value $429.38M $19.65B $4.68B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCBLLGEHCLNTH
P/E -15.6x 16.3x 23.6x
P/FCF -19.0x 20.4x 16.8x
P/Operating cash flow -19.2x 15.4x 15.8x
P/S 10.2x 1.5x 4.2x
P/B 8.1x 2.9x 5.0x
P/Tangible book 8.1x 3.5x 10.5x
EV/EBITDA -13.6x 12.0x 16.4x
EV/EBIT -13.3x 14.7x 21.5x
EV/Revenue 9.1x 1.9x 4.2x
EV/FCF -17.0x 25.5x 16.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -17.2x 19.2x 15.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.43 0.22

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCBLLGEHCLNTH
Revenue growth (1Y) 31.7% 6.5% 2.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 3.8% 11.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 33.4% 1.3% -3.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 3.7% 16.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -34.6% -0.9% -30.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% 118.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -33.6% -11.5% 1.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% 102.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -27.5% -10.6% 5.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 6.7% 105.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -44.3% 5.1% -21.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 0.2% 14.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -41.8% 0.6% -10.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -2.8% 103.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCBLLGEHCLNTH
Gross margin 88.9% 39.5% 60.1%
EBITDA margin -67.1% 15.7% 25.4%
Operating margin -68.6% 12.9% 19.4%
Pretax margin -64.7% 12.5% 23.3%
Net margin -64.7% 9.3% 17.7%
FCF margin -53.7% 7.4% 24.9%
Operating cash flow margin -53.0% 9.9% 26.5%
Return on equity -49.0% 18.9% 21.8%
Return on assets -38.3% 5.5% 11.6%
Return on invested capital – 10.1% 12.5%
Return on capital employed -45.1% 9.5% 14.8%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 1.0x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 16.1% 0.7% 5.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCBLLGEHCLNTH
Debt / assets 12.0% 27.1% 23.6%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.9x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 2.4x -0.1x
Debt / FCF -0.4x 6.4x 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 22.9% 70.5% 45.7%
Equity / assets 77.1% 29.5% 54.3%
Interest coverage -38.6x 6.4x 15.3x
Current ratio 9.2x 1.3x 3.1x
Quick ratio 8.6x 0.9x 2.8x
Cash ratio 7.5x 0.3x 1.8x
Altman Z-score 14.41 1.85 5.45

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCBLLGEHCLNTH
Dividend yield – 0.3% –
Net buyback yield -0.6% 1.2% 2.9%
Shareholder yield -0.6% 1.4% 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCBLLGEHCLNTH
Forward P/E – 14.0xFY2026 17.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.86FY2026 $5.09FY2026 $5.76FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +10.9%FY2026 -5.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -0.6% +4.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $118.32MFY2026 $22.47BFY2026 $1.57BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +32.9%FY2026 +8.9%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +21.1% +7.5% +12.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCBLLGEHCLNTH
Held by institutions 79.9% 87.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 124 1,221 465
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.2% +1.7% +3.4%
Institutions buying 74 538 248
Institutions selling 36 461 142
Buyers to sellers 2.06 1.17 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CBLLGEHCLNTH
CBLL 1.00 0.32 0.21
GEHC 0.32 1.00 0.19
LNTH 0.21 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CBLL, GEHC and LNTH?

GE HealthCare Technologies (GEHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ceribell (CBLL) $1.03B, GE HealthCare Technologies (GEHC) $32.60B, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) $6.51B.

Which stock is cheaper, CBLL, GEHC and LNTH?

GE HealthCare Technologies (GEHC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ceribell (CBLL) -15.6x, GE HealthCare Technologies (GEHC) 16.4x, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 23.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, GE HealthCare Technologies (GEHC) is cheapest (GE HealthCare Technologies (GEHC) 14.0x, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 17.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ceribell (CBLL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ceribell (CBLL) +31.7%, GE HealthCare Technologies (GEHC) +6.5%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) +2.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) has the highest net margin (Ceribell (CBLL) -64.7%, GE HealthCare Technologies (GEHC) 9.3%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 17.7%). On return on invested capital, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) leads (GE HealthCare Technologies (GEHC) 10.1%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 12.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ceribell (CBLL) returned the most: Ceribell (CBLL) +109.7%, GE HealthCare Technologies (GEHC) -7.5%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) +76.6%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) has been the steadiest (Ceribell (CBLL) 52.1%, GE HealthCare Technologies (GEHC) 34.9%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 32.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CBLL, GEHC and LNTH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.