BUR vs RGLD vs VMET Stock Comparison

Burford Capital, Royal Gold and Versamet Royalties Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BUR Burford Capital Ltd
$3.48 -11.0% 1M -65.4% 1Y
Market cap
$764.15M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.93B
Div. yield
3.45%
Specialty Finance Financial Services
2 wins
RGLD Royal Gold Inc
$236.83 -0.9% 1M +33.9% 1Y
Market cap
$20.05B
P/E
27.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.55B
Div. yield
0.80%
Specialty Finance Financial Services
7 wins
VMET Versamet Royalties Corp
$8.74 -3.1% 1M
Market cap
$816.42M
P/E
23.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$70.89M
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Royal Gold leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Royal Gold 7, Versamet Royalties 3, Burford Capital 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBURRGLDVMETLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $764.15M $20.05B $816.42M RGLD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.5x 27.2x 23.9x VMET
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 21.8x 35.0x RGLD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +196.5% +93.5% — BUR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -87.2% 47.7% 47.8% VMET
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -38.4% 9.7% 16.9% VMET
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.2x 0.7x RGLD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.45% 0.80% — BUR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -65.4% +33.9% — RGLD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.8%/yr +19.1%/yr — RGLD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 82.4% 41.1% 64.0% RGLD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 22/100 69/100 67/100 RGLD

Percentile Scorecard

BURRGLDVMET

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBURRGLDVMET
Valuation 35 #111 of 169 19 #137 of 169 17 #140 of 169
Growth 8 #146 of 159 94 #11 of 159 –
Profitability 19 #118 of 146 95 #9 of 146 89 #17 of 146
Financial Health 24 #117 of 153 92 #13 of 153 95 #9 of 153
Shareholder Returns 25 #102 of 135 45 #75 of 135 –
Overall 22 69 67
  • BUR ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • RGLD ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • VMET ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBURRGLDVMETSPY
1 month -11.0%-0.9%-3.1% +0.7%
3 months -17.1%+16.6%-2.7% +3.7%
6 months -29.3%+1.5%-21.6% +7.1%
Year to date -61.0%+6.5%— +12.8%
1 year -65.4%+33.9%— +11.9%
3 years -71.8%+123.0%— +85.2%
3 years, per year -34.5%+30.7%— +22.8%
5 years -66.9%+139.2%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -19.8%+19.1%— +10.9%
10 years -28.1%+258.5%— +262.0%
10 years, per year -3.2%+13.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBURRGLDVMETSPY
Volatility, 1Y 82.4%41.1%64.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 105.8%41.5%59.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.311.501.97 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.790.83— 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -81.8%-40.9%-40.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -65.4%-22.2%-35.4% -1.2%
52-week high $10.06$304.29$13.53 $779.14
52-week low $2.99$169.08$8.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBURRGLDVMET
P/E now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 11.7x 27.2xmedian 11.7x 23.9xmedian 11.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.7x 13.0xmedian 2.7x 11.5xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.1x 16.2xmedian 13.1x 15.2xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.1xmedian 6.5x 34,279xmedian 6.5x 5,479xmedian 6.5x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 0.7x 2.6xmedian 0.7x 2.1xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.33 0.77median 0.33 —median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBURRGLDVMET
Revenue $1.93B $1.55B $70.89M
Gross profit – $1.34B $28.92M
Operating income -$1.49B $950.24M $72.41M
Net income -$1.69B $739.81M $33.88M
Free cash flow -$184.86M $585.00K –
EPS (diluted) $-7.49 $8.68 $0.35
Cash & equivalents $696.90M $182.47M $13.24M
Total debt $2.40B $395.89M $125.61M
Shares (diluted) 225.09M 85.05M 95.51M
Enterprise value -$1.23B $19.28B $791.92M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBURRGLDVMET
P/E -0.5x 27.2x 23.9x
P/FCF -4.1x 34,279x 5,479x
P/Operating cash flow -4.1x 19.2x –
P/S 0.4x 13.0x 11.5x
P/B 0.5x 2.6x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 0.5x 2.6x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA – 16.2x 15.2x
EV/EBIT -1.7x 21.3x 11.8x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 13.1x 12.0x
EV/FCF -13.4x 34,644x –
EV/Operating cash flow -13.4x 19.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.77 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBURRGLDVMET
Revenue growth (1Y) 196.5% 93.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 36.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 92.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 37.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -414.8% 83.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 48.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) -639.6% 64.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 47.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) -793.8% 27.1% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 35.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -155.6% 84.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 36.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -155.8% -99.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 26.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBURRGLDVMET
Gross margin – 86.9% 40.8%
EBITDA margin – 80.8% 79.4%
Operating margin -77.3% 61.4% 102.1%
Pretax margin -87.5% 58.8% 56.3%
Net margin -87.2% 47.7% 47.8%
FCF margin -9.6% 0.0% –
Operating cash flow margin -9.5% 67.5% –
Return on equity -113.6% 9.9% 8.9%
Return on assets -39.7% 7.9% 5.5%
Return on invested capital -38.4% 9.7% 16.9%
Return on capital employed – 10.2% –
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 1.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.0% 0.8% 3.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBURRGLDVMET
Debt / assets 56.3% 4.2% 6.3%
Debt / equity 1.6x 0.1x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.2x 0.7x
Debt / FCF -13.0x 676.7x –
Liabilities / assets 65.6% 19.2% 49.9%
Equity / assets 34.4% 80.8% 50.1%
Interest coverage -8.2x 19.2x 4.5x
Current ratio – 2.9x –
Quick ratio – 2.5x –
Cash ratio – 1.4x –
Altman Z-score – 7.40 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBURRGLDVMET
Dividend yield 3.4% 0.8% –
Net buyback yield 0.5% 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 3.9% 0.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 18.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 23,897% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 25.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 13.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBURRGLDVMET
Forward P/E – 21.8xFY2026 35.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-7.29FY2026 $10.85FY2026 $0.25FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -2,703.6%FY2026 +48.0%FY2026 +19.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +24.1% +32.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year -$1.34BFY2026 $1.96BFY2026 $92.75MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -424.6%FY2026 +90.4%FY2026 +166.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +4.5% +44.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBURRGLDVMET
Held by institutions 69.4% 83.5% –
Institutions holding 233 763 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.2% +1.2% –
Institutions buying 150 378 –
Institutions selling 47 265 –
Buyers to sellers 3.19 1.43 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BURRGLDVMET
BUR 1.00 0.06 0.11
RGLD 0.06 1.00 0.49
VMET 0.11 0.49 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BUR, RGLD and VMET?

Royal Gold (RGLD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Burford Capital (BUR) $764.15M, Royal Gold (RGLD) $20.05B, Versamet Royalties (VMET) $816.42M.

Which stock is cheaper, BUR, RGLD and VMET?

Versamet Royalties (VMET) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Burford Capital (BUR) -0.5x, Royal Gold (RGLD) 27.2x, Versamet Royalties (VMET) 23.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Royal Gold (RGLD) is cheapest (Royal Gold (RGLD) 21.8x, Versamet Royalties (VMET) 35.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Burford Capital (BUR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Burford Capital (BUR) +196.5%, Royal Gold (RGLD) +93.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Versamet Royalties (VMET) has the highest net margin (Burford Capital (BUR) -87.2%, Royal Gold (RGLD) 47.7%, Versamet Royalties (VMET) 47.8%). On return on invested capital, Versamet Royalties (VMET) leads (Burford Capital (BUR) -38.4%, Royal Gold (RGLD) 9.7%, Versamet Royalties (VMET) 16.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Royal Gold (RGLD) returned the most: Burford Capital (BUR) -65.4%, Royal Gold (RGLD) +33.9%. Over five years, Royal Gold (RGLD) compounded fastest (Burford Capital (BUR) -19.8%/yr, Royal Gold (RGLD) +19.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Burford Capital (BUR) has the highest dividend yield: Burford Capital (BUR) 3.45%, Royal Gold (RGLD) 0.80%. Versamet Royalties (VMET) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Royal Gold (RGLD) has been the steadiest (Burford Capital (BUR) 82.4%, Royal Gold (RGLD) 41.1%, Versamet Royalties (VMET) 64.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BUR, RGLD and VMET?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Royal Gold (RGLD) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.