BTQ vs FCCN vs QUBT Stock Comparison

BTQ Technologies, Spectral Capital and Quantum Computing Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BTQ BTQ Technologies Corp.
$2.16 -23.9% 1M -72.8% 1Y
Market cap
$267.16M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
FCCN SPECTRAL CAPITAL Corp
$1.83 -53.0% 1M -14.9% 1Y
Market cap
$181.34M
P/E
3,859x
Revenue (TTM)
$668.63M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
3 wins
QUBT Quantum Computing Inc.
$6.82 -19.4% 1M -56.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.47B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$9.82M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Spectral Capital leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Spectral Capital 3, Quantum Computing 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBTQFCCNQUBTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $267.16M $181.34M $1.47B QUBT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -7.7x 3,859x -98.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +3,635.4% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 0.0% -152.5% FCCN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -72.8% -14.9% -56.1% FCCN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +1.8%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 119.6% 109.6% 88.8% QUBT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 16/100 41/100 33/100 FCCN

Percentile Scorecard

BTQFCCNQUBT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBTQFCCNQUBT
Valuation 5 #118 of 124 57 #54 of 124 25 #93 of 124
Growth 0 #113 of 113 42 #66 of 113 29 #81 of 113
Profitability 2 #107 of 109 62 #42 of 109 18 #90 of 109
Financial Health 51 #63 of 127 18 #105 of 127 93 #10 of 127
Shareholder Returns 21 #50 of 63 29 #45 of 63 0 #63 of 63
Overall 16 41 33
  • BTQ ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FCCN ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • QUBT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBTQFCCNQUBTSPY
1 month -23.9%-53.0%-19.4% +0.7%
3 months -39.0%-64.0%-15.0% +3.7%
6 months -24.2%-10.7%-24.4% +7.1%
Year to date -57.8%-55.7%-33.5% +12.8%
1 year -72.8%-14.9%-56.1% +11.9%
3 years +597.7%—+917.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +91.2%—+116.8% +22.8%
5 years ——+9.1% +67.6%
5 years, per year ——+1.8% +10.9%
10 years ——+3,310.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——+42.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBTQFCCNQUBTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 119.6%109.6%88.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 102.4%100.8%85.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 4.270.053.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.61-0.14-0.63 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -85.9%-81.6%-94.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -72.8%-67.0%-59.2% -1.2%
52-week high $7.95$5.55$16.71 $779.14
52-week low $2.00$1.83$6.31 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBTQFCCNQUBT
P/E now vs peer median -8.5xmedian 39.0x 3,584xmedian 39.0x -102.3xmedian 39.0x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.6x 0.3xmedian 4.6x 157.1xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 32.7x 321.6xmedian 32.7x -8.6xmedian 32.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -20.5xmedian 27.4x -68.4xmedian 27.4x -30.0xmedian 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median 24.0xmedian 3.2x 3.1xmedian 3.2x 1.0xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.23 118.59median 1.23 -2.55median 1.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBTQFCCNQUBT
Revenue – $668.63M $9.82M
Gross profit – $8.35M -$1.86M
Operating income -$34.64M -$6.62M -$76.18M
Net income -$34.57M -$21.19K -$14.98M
Free cash flow -$14.76M -$2.57M -$51.48M
R&D $4.75M – $26.91M
EPS (diluted) $-0.26 $0.00 $-0.07
Cash & equivalents $6.85M $5.27M $189.15M
Shares (diluted) 135.62M 94.89M 224.73M
Enterprise value $207.89M $170.85M -$2.14B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBTQFCCNQUBT
P/E -8.5x 3,584x -102.3x
P/FCF -20.5x -68.4x -30.0x
P/Operating cash flow -20.4x -68.8x -35.9x
P/S – 0.3x 157.1x
P/B 24.0x 3.1x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 24.0x 9.0x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA – 321.6x -8.6x
EV/EBIT -8.6x -25.8x -7.7x
EV/Revenue – 0.3x 60.0x
EV/FCF -20.1x -66.4x -11.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -20.0x -66.7x -13.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 118.59 -2.55

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBTQFCCNQUBT
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 3,635%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 1,948% 230.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – -2,367%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 276.8% -158.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -1,885% -83.7% -132.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -304.6% -36.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -307.6% 99.4% 80.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 40.4% 18.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,660% 100.9% 87.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 30.2% 40.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -28.6% -128.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -186.1% -41.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -29.2% -105.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -186.6% -45.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBTQFCCNQUBT
Gross margin – 1.2% -18.9%
EBITDA margin – 0.1% -697.4%
Operating margin – -1.0% -775.5%
Pretax margin – 0.0% -152.5%
Net margin – 0.0% -152.5%
FCF margin – -0.4% -524.0%
Operating cash flow margin – -0.4% -438.3%
Return on equity -234.8% 0.1% -0.9%
Return on assets -191.6% 0.0% -0.9%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -247.3% -4.7% -4.7%
Asset turnover – 2.2x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 120.9x 2.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.1% 86.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBTQFCCNQUBT
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 26.9% 74.3% 2.9%
Equity / assets 73.1% 25.7% 97.1%
Interest coverage -775.2x – -577.1x
Current ratio 1.9x 0.8x 53.1x
Quick ratio 1.7x 0.8x 51.7x
Cash ratio 1.7x 0.0x 51.3x
Altman Z-score – 3.17 20.00

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBTQFCCNQUBT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -2.4% -1.1% -77.7%
Shareholder yield -2.4% -1.1% -77.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBTQFCCNQUBT
EPS, next fiscal year – – $-0.15FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $29.28MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +4,193.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +84.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBTQFCCNQUBT
Held by institutions 28.2% – 45.4%
Institutions holding 94 – 314
Change in shares held, QoQ +103.2% – +10.7%
Institutions buying 55 – 196
Institutions selling 15 – 61
Buyers to sellers 3.67 – 3.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BTQFCCNQUBT
BTQ 1.00 -0.07 0.63
FCCN -0.07 1.00 0.06
QUBT 0.63 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BTQ, FCCN and QUBT?

Quantum Computing (QUBT) is the largest by market capitalisation: BTQ Technologies (BTQ) $267.16M, Spectral Capital (FCCN) $181.34M, Quantum Computing (QUBT) $1.47B.

Which company is more profitable?

Spectral Capital (FCCN) has the highest net margin (Spectral Capital (FCCN) 0.0%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) -152.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Spectral Capital (FCCN) returned the most: BTQ Technologies (BTQ) -72.8%, Spectral Capital (FCCN) -14.9%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) -56.1%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Quantum Computing (QUBT) has been the steadiest (BTQ Technologies (BTQ) 119.6%, Spectral Capital (FCCN) 109.6%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) 88.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BTQ, FCCN and QUBT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Spectral Capital (FCCN) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.