BLSH vs CNTN vs EXOD Stock Comparison

Bullish, Canton Strategic Holdings and Exodus Movement Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLSH Bullish
$28.74 -20.1% 1M -46.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.60B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$190.34B
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
4 wins
EXOD Exodus Movement, Inc.
$5.77 -23.5% 1M -76.9% 1Y
Market cap
$109.35M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$108.70M
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
1 win

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Bullish leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Bullish 4, Exodus Movement 1, Canton Strategic Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLSHCNTNEXODLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.60B $445.66M $109.35M BLSH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.6x -4.5x -1.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 68.4x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -26.5% — -14.2% EXOD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.7% — -79.9% BLSH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -4.8% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.6x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -46.8% -30.4% -76.9% CNTN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -19.4%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.0% 93.6% 103.5% BLSH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 39/100 30/100 BLSH

Percentile Scorecard

BLSHCNTNEXOD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLSHCNTNEXOD
Valuation 76 #25 of 99 38 #62 of 99 31 #69 of 99
Growth 33 #63 of 94 8 #87 of 94 5 #89 of 94
Profitability 48 #47 of 90 39 #55 of 90 29 #64 of 90
Financial Health 95 #6 of 105 97 #4 of 105 14 #90 of 105
Shareholder Returns – 14 #51 of 59 71 #18 of 59
Overall 63 39 30
  • BLSH ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • CNTN ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • EXOD ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLSHCNTNEXODSPY
1 month -20.1%-24.2%-23.5% +0.9%
3 months +31.5%+5.7%+13.8% +5.9%
6 months -21.3%-34.6%-18.4% +8.5%
Year to date -24.1%-32.7%-61.0% +13.3%
1 year -46.8%-30.4%-76.9% +12.4%
3 years —-96.9%+15.4% +88.1%
3 years, per year —-68.6%+4.9% +23.5%
5 years ——-66.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year ——-19.4% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureBLSHCNTNEXODSPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.0%93.6%103.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.5%98.9%103.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.741.933.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.64-0.32-0.74 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.8%-99.9%-96.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.8%-62.8%-77.1% -0.9%
52-week high $54.01$5.48$25.19 $779.14
52-week low $21.79$1.69$4.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLSHCNTNEXOD
P/E now vs peer median -2.7xmedian 19.6x -4.5xmedian 19.6x -1.3xmedian 19.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 2.3x 295.8xmedian 2.3x 1.6xmedian 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -34.0xmedian 17.5x —median 17.5x -1.5xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 38.1xmedian 15.9x -20.0xmedian 15.9x -2.6xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 2.0x 1.0xmedian 2.0x 0.9xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.01 -0.51median 1.01 —median 1.01

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLSHCNTNEXOD
Revenue $190.34B – $108.70M
Gross profit $71.94M – –
Operating income -$124.59M -$53.77M –
Net income -$1.43B -$98.12M -$86.90M
Free cash flow $113.88M -$22.17M -$66.47M
EPS (diluted) $-10.84 $-0.45 $-4.53
Cash & equivalents $86.61M $37.24M $21.21M
Total debt $11.00K – –
Shares (diluted) 127.72M 216.86M 19.19M
Enterprise value -$1.22B $347.27M -$40.26M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLSHCNTNEXOD
P/E -2.7x -4.5x -1.3x
P/FCF 38.1x -20.0x -2.6x
P/Operating cash flow 35.2x -20.0x -2.6x
P/S 0.0x 295.8x 1.6x
P/B 1.8x 1.0x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 1.8x -6.5x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA -34.0x – -1.5x
EV/EBIT -32.3x -7.5x -1.4x
EV/Revenue 0.0x – 1.4x
EV/FCF 35.3x -18.3x -2.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 32.7x -18.3x -2.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.51 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLSHCNTNEXOD
Revenue growth (1Y) -26.5% – -14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -17.9% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -57.2% -360.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -81.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) -858.6% -716.7% -193.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -122.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) -755.9% 89.2% -202.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 8.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 190.7% -127.9% -207.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -44.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 171.4% -127.9% -205.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -44.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLSHCNTNEXOD
Gross margin 0.0% – –
EBITDA margin -0.1% – -96.4%
Operating margin -0.1% – –
Pretax margin -0.8% – -100.2%
Net margin -0.7% – -79.9%
FCF margin 0.1% – -61.1%
Operating cash flow margin 0.1% – -60.9%
Return on equity -55.4% -17.8% -41.4%
Return on assets -44.5% -14.3% -21.0%
Return on invested capital -4.8% – –
Return on capital employed -4.0% -9.4% -281.5%
Asset turnover 59.3x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x 0.2x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.0% – 14.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLSHCNTNEXOD
Debt / assets 0.0% – –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.6x – –
Debt / FCF 0.0x – –
Liabilities / assets 20.6% 19.4% 66.3%
Equity / assets 79.4% 80.6% 33.7%
Interest coverage -2.2x – –
Current ratio 23.5x 15.7x 1.1x
Quick ratio 2.5x 14.2x 0.1x
Cash ratio 2.5x 14.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 65.10 – 0.06

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLSHCNTNEXOD
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -23.2% 4.2%
Shareholder yield – -23.2% 4.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLSHCNTNEXOD
Forward P/E 68.4xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.42FY2026 $-0.70FY2026 $-2.52FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +40.0%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +95.2% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $364.64MFY2026 $0.00FY2024 $105.13MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +26.4%FY2026 – -13.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.7% – +34.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLSHCNTNEXOD
Held by institutions 32.8% 9.3% 10.8%
Institutions holding 175 68 32
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.8% +70.5% +3.3%
Institutions buying 87 60 21
Institutions selling 70 5 7
Buyers to sellers 1.24 12.00 3.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLSHCNTNEXOD
BLSH 1.00 0.28 0.51
CNTN 0.28 1.00 0.30
EXOD 0.51 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLSH, CNTN and EXOD?

Bullish (BLSH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bullish (BLSH) $3.60B, Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) $445.66M, Exodus Movement (EXOD) $109.35M.

Which company is growing faster?

Exodus Movement (EXOD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bullish (BLSH) -26.5%, Exodus Movement (EXOD) -14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bullish (BLSH) has the highest net margin (Bullish (BLSH) -0.7%, Exodus Movement (EXOD) -79.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) returned the most: Bullish (BLSH) -46.8%, Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) -30.4%, Exodus Movement (EXOD) -76.9%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bullish (BLSH) has been the steadiest (Bullish (BLSH) 73.0%, Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) 93.6%, Exodus Movement (EXOD) 103.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLSH, CNTN and EXOD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bullish (BLSH) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.