BLLN vs GH vs NTRA Stock Comparison

BillionToOne, Guardant Health and Natera Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLLN BillionToOne, Inc.
$107.77 -5.8% 1M
Market cap
$5.16B
P/E
171.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$397.41M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Labs Healthcare
5 wins
GH Guardant Health, Inc.
$169.08 -4.1% 1M +143.8% 1Y
Market cap
$23.05B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.18B
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Labs Healthcare
1 win
NTRA Natera, Inc.
$403.95 +3.4% 1M +107.2% 1Y
Market cap
$58.02B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.71B
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Labs Healthcare
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

BillionToOne leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (BillionToOne 5, Natera 3, Guardant Health 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLLNGHNTRALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.16B $23.05B $58.02B NTRA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 171.7x -50.8x -301.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 141.8x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +90.1% +42.7% +37.8% BLLN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.6% -38.3% -7.1% BLLN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.0% — -11.7% BLLN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -9.1x — 4.5x BLLN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — +143.8% +107.2% GH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +9.1%/yr +28.6%/yr NTRA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 94.8% 57.4% 47.9% NTRA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 27/100 50/100 BLLN

Percentile Scorecard

BLLNGHNTRA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLLNGHNTRA
Valuation 20 #75 of 93 17 #77 of 93 16 #78 of 93
Growth 100 #1 of 88 48 #46 of 88 71 #26 of 88
Profitability 59 #36 of 87 7 #81 of 87 33 #59 of 87
Financial Health 96 #5 of 100 50 #51 of 100 86 #15 of 100
Shareholder Returns 7 #52 of 56 15 #48 of 56 44 #32 of 56
Overall 56 27 50
  • BLLN ranked among 103 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • GH ranked among 103 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • NTRA ranked among 103 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLLNGHNTRASPY
1 month -5.8%-4.1%+3.4% -1.0%
3 months -14.5%+14.8%+54.2% +2.9%
6 months +27.2%+90.2%+98.3% +6.4%
Year to date +31.7%+65.5%+76.3% +11.4%
1 year —+143.8%+107.2% +13.1%
3 years —+541.9%+890.3% +79.4%
3 years, per year —+85.9%+114.9% +21.5%
5 years —+54.6%+251.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year —+9.1%+28.6% +10.9%
10 years ——+3,943.5% +255.2%
10 years, per year ——+44.8% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureBLLNGHNTRASPY
Volatility, 1Y 94.8%57.4%47.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 107.8%48.6%44.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.651.011.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —2.502.24 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.8%-86.7%-76.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.1%-9.7%-5.1% -2.5%
52-week high $149.97$187.22$425.64 $779.14
52-week low $64.03$69.35$182.65 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLLNGHNTRA
P/E now vs peer median 166.4xmedian 25.3x -49.5xmedian 25.3x -300.8xmedian 25.3x
P/S now vs peer median 12.7xmedian 1.6x 19.1xmedian 1.6x 21.4xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 91.3xmedian 14.6x -49.9xmedian 14.6x -254.2xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 152.1xmedian 22.7x -93.8xmedian 22.7x 689.0xmedian 22.7x
P/B now vs peer median 9.4xmedian 3.3x -101.4xmedian 3.3x 31.8xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.66 -4.99median 0.66 -9.07median 0.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLLNGHNTRA
Revenue $397.41M $1.18B $2.71B
Gross profit $283.22M $769.16M $1.71B
Operating income $43.30M -$470.26M -$289.67M
Net income $37.71M -$453.44M -$192.36M
Free cash flow $33.18M -$240.72M $84.20M
R&D $59.21M $375.79M $787.38M
EPS (diluted) $0.55 $-3.41 $-1.34
Cash & equivalents $548.63M $1.05B $1.10B
Total debt $91.03M – $321.26M
Shares (diluted) 54.46M 132.87M 143.28M
Enterprise value $3.38B $19.11B $53.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLLNGHNTRA
P/E 166.4x -49.5x -300.8x
P/FCF 152.1x -93.8x 689.0x
P/Operating cash flow 111.3x -122.0x 254.2x
P/S 12.7x 19.1x 21.4x
P/B 9.4x -101.4x 31.8x
P/Tangible book 9.4x -91.0x 39.7x
EV/EBITDA 91.3x -49.9x -254.2x
EV/EBIT 106.0x -45.8x -196.7x
EV/Revenue 11.5x 18.2x 21.1x
EV/FCF 138.3x -89.5x 676.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 101.2x -116.3x 249.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -4.99 -9.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLLNGHNTRA
Revenue growth (1Y) 90.1% 42.7% 37.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 32.4% 42.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 122.4% 47.7% 43.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 68.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 253.2% -2.1% 1.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 4.8% 17.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 223.2% -9.6% 24.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 3.7% 27.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 118.7% -2.4% 27.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 9.9% 33.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 22.4% 22.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 18.1% 38.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 11.4% -26.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.4% 30.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLLNGHNTRA
Gross margin 71.3% 65.0% 63.2%
EBITDA margin 12.6% -36.5% -8.3%
Operating margin 10.9% -39.7% -10.7%
Pretax margin 9.5% -38.4% -9.3%
Net margin 7.6% -38.3% -7.1%
FCF margin 8.3% -20.3% 3.1%
Operating cash flow margin 11.4% -15.7% 8.4%
Return on equity 7.2% – -10.7%
Return on assets 5.3% -23.7% -7.3%
Return on invested capital 7.0% – -11.7%
Return on capital employed 6.6% -29.9% -13.9%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.6x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 0.4x -1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 6.4% 16.2% 14.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLLNGHNTRA
Debt / assets 12.5% – 3.0%
Debt / equity 0.2x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -9.1x – 4.5x
Debt / FCF 2.7x – 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 26.4% 111.7% 31.5%
Equity / assets 73.6% -11.7% 68.5%
Interest coverage 1,056x -97.6x -75.9x
Current ratio 11.7x 4.0x 3.0x
Quick ratio 11.2x 3.5x 2.8x
Cash ratio 9.8x 3.1x 2.0x
Altman Z-score 16.94 4.44 41.25

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLLNGHNTRA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -6.0% -1.8% -0.1%
Shareholder yield -6.0% -1.8% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLLNGHNTRA
Forward P/E 141.8xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.76FY2026 $-3.34FY2026 $-1.47FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +442.9%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +22.4% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $481.77MFY2026 $1.42BFY2026 $3.07BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +57.9%FY2026 +44.5%FY2026 +32.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +27.1% +27.0% +6.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLLNGHNTRA
Held by institutions 32.6% 100.0% 95.5%
Institutions holding 155 594 847
Change in shares held, QoQ +34.7% -2.6% +2.7%
Institutions buying 127 353 513
Institutions selling 13 180 240
Buyers to sellers 9.77 1.96 2.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLLNGHNTRA
BLLN 1.00 0.30 0.35
GH 0.30 1.00 0.54
NTRA 0.35 0.54 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLLN, GH and NTRA?

Natera (NTRA) is the largest by market capitalisation: BillionToOne (BLLN) $5.16B, Guardant Health (GH) $23.05B, Natera (NTRA) $58.02B.

Which company is growing faster?

BillionToOne (BLLN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: BillionToOne (BLLN) +90.1%, Guardant Health (GH) +42.7%, Natera (NTRA) +37.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

BillionToOne (BLLN) has the highest net margin (BillionToOne (BLLN) 7.6%, Guardant Health (GH) -38.3%, Natera (NTRA) -7.1%). On return on invested capital, BillionToOne (BLLN) leads (BillionToOne (BLLN) 7.0%, Natera (NTRA) -11.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Guardant Health (GH) returned the most: Guardant Health (GH) +143.8%, Natera (NTRA) +107.2%. Over five years, Natera (NTRA) compounded fastest (Guardant Health (GH) +9.1%/yr, Natera (NTRA) +28.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Natera (NTRA) has been the steadiest (BillionToOne (BLLN) 94.8%, Guardant Health (GH) 57.4%, Natera (NTRA) 47.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLLN, GH and NTRA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, BillionToOne (BLLN) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.