BIOX vs SNES Stock Comparison

Bioceres Crop Solutions and SenesTech Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SNES SenesTech, Inc.
$0.85 +19.7% 1M -77.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.51M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.37M
Div. yield
–
Crop Protection and Seeds Basic Materials
4 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

SenesTech leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (SenesTech 4, Bioceres Crop Solutions 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBIOXSNESLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.91M $4.51M BIOX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.1x -0.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 4.4x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -24.3% +13.4% SNES
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -92.3% -294.7% BIOX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.7x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -88.0% -77.4% SNES
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -55.8%/yr -81.3%/yr BIOX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 103.1% 85.0% SNES
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 47/100 SNES

Percentile Scorecard

BIOXSNES

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBIOXSNES
Valuation 73 #10 of 34 21 #27 of 34
Growth 0 #33 of 33 84 #6 of 33
Profitability 45 #17 of 30 17 #25 of 30
Financial Health 14 #31 of 36 66 #13 of 36
Shareholder Returns – –
Overall 33 47
  • BIOX ranked among 38 companies in Chemicals
  • SNES ranked among 38 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBIOXSNESSPY
1 month -40.5%+19.7% -0.8%
3 months -33.3%-36.1% +3.5%
6 months -57.7%-42.6% +7.0%
Year to date -83.2%-60.3% +12.2%
1 year -88.0%-77.4% +13.0%
3 years -98.0%-97.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year -72.8%-71.6% +23.1%
5 years -98.3%-100.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year -55.8%-81.3% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureBIOXSNESSPY
Volatility, 1Y 103.1%85.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 119.2%79.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.831.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.85-0.91 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.6%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -89.2%-77.0% -1.8%
52-week high $2.03$3.69 $779.14
52-week low $0.22$0.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBIOXSNES
P/E now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 17.4x -0.6xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 1.2x 1.9xmedian 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.4x 0.1xmedian 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.3x -0.7xmedian 10.3x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.2x 0.7xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 1.64 -0.01median 1.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBIOXSNES
Revenue $246.31M $2.37M
Gross profit $75.20M $1.57M
Operating income -$4.27M -$7.21M
Net income -$226.12M -$7.00M
Free cash flow – -$6.74M
R&D – $1.65M
EPS (diluted) $-3.59 $-1.32
Cash & equivalents $11.20M $5.08M
Total debt $1.00B $793.00K
Shares (diluted) 63.23M 5.30M
Enterprise value -$449.67M -$26.25M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBIOXSNES
P/E -0.1x -0.6x
P/FCF – -0.7x
P/Operating cash flow – -0.7x
P/S 0.1x 1.9x
P/B – 0.7x
P/Tangible book – 0.7x
EV/EBITDA – 0.1x
EV/EBIT -39.3x 0.1x
EV/Revenue 0.7x -0.2x
EV/FCF – 0.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – 0.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 -0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBIOXSNES
Revenue growth (1Y) -24.3% 13.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -16.3% 29.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -34.2% 17.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -25.8% 49.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -201.4% -18.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -27.6% 6.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -285.4% -15.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -134.2% 7.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -310.1% 59.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -141.5% 84.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -25.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 6.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -23.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 6.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBIOXSNES
Gross margin 30.5% 66.2%
EBITDA margin – -298.5%
Operating margin -1.7% -303.7%
Pretax margin -22.0% -294.7%
Net margin -92.3% -294.7%
FCF margin – -283.7%
Operating cash flow margin – -281.4%
Return on equity – -101.8%
Return on assets -45.8% -68.3%
Return on invested capital – –
Return on capital employed -1.8% -78.0%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 12.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBIOXSNES
Debt / assets 35.2% 1.9%
Debt / equity – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.7x
Debt / FCF – 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 86.4% 35.8%
Equity / assets – 64.2%
Interest coverage – -360.5x
Current ratio 0.8x 6.8x
Quick ratio 0.5x 5.4x
Cash ratio 0.0x 5.1x
Altman Z-score – -22.49

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBIOXSNES
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – -128.3%
Shareholder yield – -128.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBIOXSNES
Forward P/E 4.4xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.05FY2027 $-1.34FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +1,040.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $395.84MFY2027 $3.06MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +66.1%FY2027 +37.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +21.3% +49.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBIOXSNES
Held by institutions 13.3% –
Institutions holding 28 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -8.9% –
Institutions buying 9 –
Institutions selling 6 –
Buyers to sellers 1.50 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BIOXSNES
BIOX 1.00 0.19
SNES 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BIOX and SNES?

Bioceres Crop Solutions (BIOX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bioceres Crop Solutions (BIOX) $13.91M, SenesTech (SNES) $4.51M.

Which company is growing faster?

SenesTech (SNES) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bioceres Crop Solutions (BIOX) -24.3%, SenesTech (SNES) +13.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bioceres Crop Solutions (BIOX) has the highest net margin (Bioceres Crop Solutions (BIOX) -92.3%, SenesTech (SNES) -294.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year SenesTech (SNES) returned the most: Bioceres Crop Solutions (BIOX) -88.0%, SenesTech (SNES) -77.4%. Over five years, Bioceres Crop Solutions (BIOX) compounded fastest (Bioceres Crop Solutions (BIOX) -55.8%/yr, SenesTech (SNES) -81.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, SenesTech (SNES) has been the steadiest (Bioceres Crop Solutions (BIOX) 103.1%, SenesTech (SNES) 85.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do BIOX and SNES move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.19, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, BIOX and SNES?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, SenesTech (SNES) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.