BHE vs FN vs TTMI Stock Comparison

Benchmark Electronics, Fabrinet and Ttm Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BHE Benchmark Electronics Inc
$66.94 -18.9% 1M +57.7% 1Y
Market cap
$2.52B
P/E
47.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.82B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
4 wins
FN Fabrinet
$325.18 -22.1% 1M -22.8% 1Y
Market cap
$12.18B
P/E
25.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.64B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
4 wins
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$85.50 -33.8% 1M +45.5% 1Y
Market cap
$9.32B
P/E
39.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.38B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fabrinet leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Fabrinet 4, Benchmark Electronics 4, Ttm Technologies 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBHEFNTTMILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.52B $12.18B $9.32B FN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 47.5x 25.7x 39.4x FN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.2x 19.2x 16.2x TTMI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.9% +35.7% +27.6% FN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.9% 10.2% 7.0% FN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.7% — 10.6% TTMI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.9x — 1.0x BHE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +57.7% -22.8% +45.5% BHE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +21.7%/yr +28.0%/yr +44.5%/yr TTMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.4% 77.6% 90.5% BHE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 58/100 59/100 BHE

Percentile Scorecard

BHEFNTTMI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBHEFNTTMI
Valuation 84 #19 of 111 49 #57 of 111 51 #55 of 111
Growth 53 #51 of 108 61 #43 of 108 88 #14 of 108
Profitability 52 #50 of 104 71 #31 of 104 62 #40 of 104
Financial Health 48 #60 of 115 59 #48 of 115 37 #73 of 115
Shareholder Returns 63 #31 of 81 53 #39 of 81 –
Overall 60 58 59
  • BHE ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • FN ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • TTMI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBHEFNTTMISPY
1 month -18.9%-22.1%-33.8% -0.8%
3 months -15.9%-30.9%-30.9% +3.5%
6 months -3.3%-52.5%-40.7% +7.0%
Year to date +56.5%-28.6%+23.9% +12.2%
1 year +57.7%-22.8%+45.5% +13.0%
3 years +178.3%+114.0%+642.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +40.7%+28.9%+95.2% +23.1%
5 years +166.6%+243.7%+528.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +21.7%+28.0%+44.5% +11.0%
10 years +163.5%+646.5%+652.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year +10.2%+22.3%+22.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBHEFNTTMISPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.4%77.6%90.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.6%83.2%97.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.983.133.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.27-0.290.50 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.2%-57.8%-66.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.2%-56.4%-61.4% -1.8%
52-week high $98.67$746.47$221.47 $779.14
52-week low $42.15$314.98$58.45 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBHEFNTTMI
P/E now vs peer median 45.2xmedian 32.0x 24.6xmedian 32.0x 37.7xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 2.8x 2.5xmedian 2.8x 2.7xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.7xmedian 19.4x 20.3xmedian 19.4x 19.4xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.9xmedian 29.0x 2,760xmedian 29.0x -594.9xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 2.9x 4.7xmedian 2.9x 4.7xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median -5.82median 1.13 1.00median 1.13 0.80median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBHEFNTTMI
Revenue $2.82B $4.64B $3.38B
Gross profit $289.75M $556.51M $715.64M
Operating income $95.93M $462.89M $334.16M
Net income $53.14M $473.03M $236.78M
Free cash flow $126.98M $4.22M -$15.14M
R&D – – $29.71M
EPS (diluted) $1.46 $13.05 $2.20
Cash & equivalents $314.84M $346.71M $507.91M
Total debt $180.98M – $3.72B
Shares (diluted) 36.40M 36.25M 107.58M
Enterprise value $1.28B $8.43B $7.41B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBHEFNTTMI
P/E 45.2x 24.6x 37.7x
P/FCF 18.9x 2,760x -594.9x
P/Operating cash flow 13.6x 45.4x 27.9x
P/S 0.9x 2.5x 2.7x
P/B 2.2x 4.7x 4.7x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 4.8x 5.0x
EV/EBITDA 14.7x 20.3x 19.4x
EV/EBIT 23.7x 23.3x 28.3x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 2.3x 2.8x
EV/FCF 17.9x 2,553x -625.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.8x 42.0x 29.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -5.82 1.00 0.80

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBHEFNTTMI
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.9% 35.7% 27.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.5% 20.6% 12.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.3% 34.6% 33.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.4% 18.3% 18.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 7.9% 42.7% 94.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -1.2% 22.5% 47.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 46.7% 42.3% 154.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -7.2% 24.0% 48.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 46.2% 42.3% 147.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -7.8% 24.7% 47.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 55.8% -21.8% 35.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 60.0% 6.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 57.3% -98.0% -185.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.8% -69.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBHEFNTTMI
Gross margin 10.3% 12.0% 21.2%
EBITDA margin 5.5% 11.4% 14.5%
Operating margin 3.4% 10.0% 9.9%
Pretax margin 3.0% 12.0% 7.8%
Net margin 1.9% 10.2% 7.0%
FCF margin 4.5% 0.1% -0.4%
Operating cash flow margin 6.3% 5.5% 9.6%
Return on equity 4.8% 19.9% 12.6%
Return on assets 2.5% 12.8% 5.6%
Return on invested capital 4.7% – 10.6%
Return on capital employed 7.1% 20.1% 11.4%
Asset turnover 1.3x 1.3x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.3x 0.5x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.7% 1.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBHEFNTTMI
Debt / assets 8.2% – 22.0%
Debt / equity 0.2x – 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.9x – 1.0x
Debt / FCF 1.4x – -64.3x
Liabilities / assets 49.6% 37.2% 56.2%
Equity / assets 50.4% 62.8% 43.8%
Interest coverage 6.0x – 7.6x
Current ratio 2.0x 2.3x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.3x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.6x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 3.53 7.83 3.82

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBHEFNTTMI
Dividend yield 1.0% – –
Net buyback yield 0.7% 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 1.7% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBHEFNTTMI
Forward P/E 23.2xFY2026 19.2xFY2027 16.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.88FY2026 $16.97FY2027 $5.29FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.0%FY2026 +20.4%FY2027 +115.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.9% +21.3% +53.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.16BFY2026 $5.84BFY2027 $4.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.8%FY2026 +25.9%FY2027 +46.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.5% +27.9% +60.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBHEFNTTMI
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 92.4%
Institutions holding 331 755 638
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.2% -6.6% +0.6%
Institutions buying 190 431 396
Institutions selling 106 245 202
Buyers to sellers 1.79 1.76 1.96

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BHEFNTTMI
BHE 1.00 0.66 0.74
FN 0.66 1.00 0.70
TTMI 0.74 0.70 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BHE, FN and TTMI?

Fabrinet (FN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Benchmark Electronics (BHE) $2.52B, Fabrinet (FN) $12.18B, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $9.32B.

Which stock is cheaper, BHE, FN and TTMI?

Fabrinet (FN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 47.5x, Fabrinet (FN) 25.7x, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 39.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) is cheapest (Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 23.2x, Fabrinet (FN) 19.2x, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 16.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fabrinet (FN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Benchmark Electronics (BHE) +8.9%, Fabrinet (FN) +35.7%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +27.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fabrinet (FN) has the highest net margin (Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 1.9%, Fabrinet (FN) 10.2%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 7.0%). On return on invested capital, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) leads (Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 4.7%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 10.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Benchmark Electronics (BHE) returned the most: Benchmark Electronics (BHE) +57.7%, Fabrinet (FN) -22.8%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +45.5%. Over five years, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) compounded fastest (Benchmark Electronics (BHE) +21.7%/yr, Fabrinet (FN) +28.0%/yr, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +44.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) has been the steadiest (Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 45.4%, Fabrinet (FN) 77.6%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BHE, FN and TTMI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fabrinet (FN) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.