BGC vs CME vs MUFG Stock Comparison

Bgc, Cme and Mitsubishi Ufj Financial Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BGC BGC Group, Inc.
$11.79 -2.6% 1M +25.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.61B
P/E
29.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.29B
Div. yield
0.01%
Institutional Trading Financial Services
3 wins
CME Cme Group Inc.
$305.71 +12.9% 1M +13.7% 1Y
Market cap
$110.23B
P/E
25.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.97B
Div. yield
–
Exchanges Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 4, Cme 4, Bgc 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBGCCMEMUFGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.61B $110.23B $240.31B MUFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.4x 25.0x 15.9x MUFG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.5x 26.2x 12.3x BGC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +27.6% +9.0% -12.0% BGC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.8% 63.3% 47.7% CME
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.2% 11.7% 3.6% CME
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.0x 0.2x — CME
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.2% +13.7% +41.0% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.4%/yr +7.0%/yr +29.6%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.3% 25.0% 26.3% CME
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 62/100 35/100 BGC

Percentile Scorecard

BGCCMEMUFG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBGCCMEMUFG
Valuation 80 #20 of 97 42 #57 of 97 21 #284 of 361
Growth 85 #11 of 69 29 #49 of 69 72 #98 of 344
Profitability 54 #33 of 70 93 #6 of 70 67 #116 of 348
Financial Health 34 #67 of 101 54 #47 of 101 4 #327 of 340
Shareholder Returns 69 #13 of 40 90 #5 of 40 11 #314 of 352
Overall 64 62 35
  • BGC ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets
  • CME ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets
  • MUFG ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBGCCMEMUFGSPY
1 month -2.6%+12.9%-7.8% -1.0%
3 months +1.2%+19.7%-8.1% +2.9%
6 months +4.6%+7.2%+21.7% +6.4%
Year to date +32.0%+11.9%+32.7% +11.4%
1 year +25.2%+13.7%+41.0% +13.1%
3 years +97.8%+42.7%+159.2% +79.4%
3 years, per year +25.6%+12.6%+37.4% +21.5%
5 years +113.6%+40.3%+264.8% +67.7%
5 years, per year +16.4%+7.0%+29.6% +10.9%
10 years +105.8%+193.7%+318.5% +255.2%
10 years, per year +7.5%+11.4%+15.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureBGCCMEMUFGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.3%25.0%26.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.0%26.8%26.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.33-0.360.91 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.760.551.56 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -45.2%-33.1%-35.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.8%-6.4%-12.8% -2.5%
52-week high $12.65$326.46$24.14 $779.14
52-week low $8.31$218.58$14.77 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBGCCMEMUFG
P/E now vs peer median 29.4xmedian 29.4x 24.8xmedian 29.4x 15.9xmedian 12.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 2.8x 15.7xmedian 2.8x 7.9xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.3xmedian 12.8x 22.7xmedian 12.8x —median 4.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.6xmedian 15.9x 25.2xmedian 15.9x —median 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 2.5x 4.1xmedian 2.5x 2.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.24median 0.51 1.81median 0.51 0.27median 1.48

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBGCCMEMUFG
Revenue $3.29B $6.97B $31.62B
Gross profit – – $29.85B
Operating income – $4.58B $18.02B
Net income $198.89M $4.42B $13.97B
Free cash flow $483.90M $4.33B –
EPS (diluted) $0.40 $12.31 $1.32
Cash & equivalents $766.85M $2.20B –
Total debt $1.77B $13.69B $494.43B
Shares (diluted) 478.97M 358.64M 11.40B
Enterprise value $2.44B $98.57B -$101.08B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBGCCMEMUFG
P/E 29.4x 24.8x 15.9x
P/FCF 11.6x 25.2x –
P/Operating cash flow 11.1x 24.7x –
P/S 1.7x 15.7x 7.9x
P/B 4.4x 4.1x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 6.5x 4.5x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 13.3x 22.7x –
EV/EBIT 16.3x 24.1x 5.2x
EV/Revenue 2.0x 15.8x 3.0x
EV/FCF 13.7x 25.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 13.1x 24.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.24 1.81 0.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBGCCMEMUFG
Revenue growth (1Y) 27.6% 9.0% -12.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 9.2% -2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 38.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 7.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 10.1% 24.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.2% 12.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 33.6% 17.3% 62.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 164.2% 13.1% 32.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 31.9% 19.4% 104.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 120.4% 13.7% 59.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 22.3% 6.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 78.1% 9.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 26.0% 6.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 86.9% 9.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBGCCMEMUFG
Gross margin – – 94.4%
EBITDA margin 15.1% 69.8% –
Operating margin – 65.7% 57.0%
Pretax margin 8.3% 82.8% 59.6%
Net margin 5.8% 63.3% 47.7%
FCF margin 14.7% 62.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 15.3% 63.5% –
Return on equity 14.9% 16.6% 11.7%
Return on assets 3.3% 2.3% 0.5%
Return on invested capital 9.2% 11.7% 3.6%
Return on capital employed – 12.3% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.5x 1.0x –
Stock comp / revenue 10.0% 1.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBGCCMEMUFG
Debt / assets 30.8% 1.8% 4.7%
Debt / equity 1.4x 0.1x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.0x 0.2x –
Debt / FCF 3.7x 0.8x –
Liabilities / assets 77.8% 86.2% 96.0%
Equity / assets 22.2% 13.8% 4.0%
Interest coverage 3.1x 26.2x 0.6x
Current ratio – 1.0x –
Quick ratio – 0.0x –
Cash ratio – 0.0x –
Altman Z-score – 0.57 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBGCCMEMUFG
Dividend yield 0.7% 3.3% 1.5%
Net buyback yield 4.0% – –
Shareholder yield 4.7% 3.3% 1.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 19.5% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 8.0% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -0.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 37.4% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBGCCMEMUFG
Forward P/E 8.5xFY2026 26.2xFY2026 12.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.39FY2026 $11.67FY2026 $1.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.8%FY2026 +4.2%FY2026 +27.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +7.9% +18.0% +0.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.68BFY2026 $7.23BFY2026 $44.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.3%FY2026 +10.9%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -6.8% +6.3% +4.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBGCCMEMUFG
Held by institutions 84.9% 88.9% 3.0%
Institutions holding 368 1,691 574
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.4% +0.4% -0.1%
Institutions buying 215 822 324
Institutions selling 86 655 160
Buyers to sellers 2.50 1.25 2.03

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BGCCMEMUFG
BGC 1.00 0.27 0.17
CME 0.27 1.00 0.02
MUFG 0.17 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BGC, CME and MUFG?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bgc (BGC) $5.61B, Cme (CME) $110.23B, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $240.31B.

Which stock is cheaper, BGC, CME and MUFG?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bgc (BGC) 29.4x, Cme (CME) 25.0x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 15.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bgc (BGC) is cheapest (Bgc (BGC) 8.5x, Cme (CME) 26.2x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bgc (BGC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bgc (BGC) +27.6%, Cme (CME) +9.0%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cme (CME) has the highest net margin (Bgc (BGC) 5.8%, Cme (CME) 63.3%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%). On return on invested capital, Cme (CME) leads (Bgc (BGC) 9.2%, Cme (CME) 11.7%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: Bgc (BGC) +25.2%, Cme (CME) +13.7%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +41.0%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Bgc (BGC) +16.4%/yr, Cme (CME) +7.0%/yr, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +29.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bgc (BGC) 0.01%, Cme (CME) 0.00%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 0.00%. Cme (CME) and Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cme (CME) has been the steadiest (Bgc (BGC) 33.3%, Cme (CME) 25.0%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BGC, CME and MUFG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.