BEEM vs BLNK vs ETN Stock Comparison

Beam Global, Blink Charging and Eaton Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BEEM Beam Global
$0.89 -25.2% 1M -69.2% 1Y
Market cap
$19.09M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$26.53M
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
1 win
BLNK Blink Charging Co.
$0.38 -34.5% 1M -79.1% 1Y
Market cap
$59.36M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$96.55M
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
1 win
ETN Eaton Corp plc
$384.22 -12.7% 1M +1.2% 1Y
Market cap
$152.67B
P/E
39.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.03B
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Eaton leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Eaton 7, Beam Global 1, Blink Charging 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBEEMBLNKETNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $19.09M $59.36M $152.67B ETN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.1x -1.2x 39.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 27.7x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -20.5% -5.9% +15.5% ETN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -64.5% -52.5% 12.8% ETN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -100.0% 10.3% ETN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x 0.8x 3.1x BEEM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -69.2% -79.1% +1.2% ETN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -51.2%/yr -58.2%/yr +18.4%/yr ETN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.8% 82.3% 40.7% ETN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 29/100 54/100 45/100 BLNK

Percentile Scorecard

BEEMBLNKETN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBEEMBLNKETN
Valuation 25 #46 of 61 32 #42 of 61 14 #175 of 203
Growth 25 #44 of 58 90 #7 of 58 73 #52 of 188
Profitability 32 #38 of 55 41 #33 of 55 75 #47 of 183
Financial Health 39 #44 of 71 53 #34 of 71 20 #174 of 217
Shareholder Returns 28 #22 of 30 – 43 #88 of 153
Overall 29 54 45
  • BEEM ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • BLNK ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • ETN ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBEEMBLNKETNSPY
1 month -25.2%-34.5%-12.7% -0.2%
3 months -14.4%-26.9%-0.5% +3.9%
6 months -54.1%-49.3%-7.0% +8.2%
Year to date -40.7%-43.3%+20.6% +12.9%
1 year -69.2%-79.1%+1.2% +12.3%
3 years -83.8%-83.8%+96.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -45.6%-45.5%+25.3% +23.3%
5 years -97.2%-98.7%+132.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -51.2%-58.2%+18.4% +10.9%
10 years -89.5%-97.9%+516.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year -20.2%-32.0%+20.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBEEMBLNKETNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.8%82.3%40.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 77.8%81.6%43.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.593.101.87 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.88-0.960.03 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.8%-99.2%-34.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -69.2%-79.1%-16.5% -1.2%
52-week high $2.89$1.82$459.94 $779.14
52-week low $0.87$0.38$315.82 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBEEMBLNKETN
P/E now vs peer median -1.1xmedian 27.2x -1.1xmedian 27.2x 39.0xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.4x 0.6xmedian 2.4x 5.0xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.4xmedian 18.4x -0.5xmedian 18.4x 26.0xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.5xmedian 28.6x -4.3xmedian 28.6x 37.9xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.7x 1.1xmedian 1.7x 7.4xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.79 -0.02median 0.79 2.94median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBEEMBLNKETN
Revenue $26.53M $96.55M $30.03B
Gross profit $2.70M $28.68M $10.78B
Operating income -$17.23M -$51.16M $5.32B
Net income -$17.11M -$48.32M $3.83B
Free cash flow -$12.98M -$12.82M $3.93B
R&D – – $844.00M
EPS (diluted) $-0.97 $-0.35 $9.83
Cash & equivalents $1.03M $34.00M $483.00M
Total debt $165.00K $265.00K $20.61B
Shares (diluted) 17.69M 144.26M 389.50M
Enterprise value $11.75M -$75.31M $149.86B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBEEMBLNKETN
P/E -1.1x -1.1x 39.0x
P/FCF -1.5x -4.3x 37.9x
P/Operating cash flow -1.5x -9.6x 30.1x
P/S 0.7x 0.6x 5.0x
P/B 1.0x 1.1x 7.4x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 1.3x 19.4x
EV/EBITDA -1.4x -0.5x 26.0x
EV/EBIT -1.1x -0.4x 31.8x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 0.2x 5.6x
EV/FCF -1.5x -1.6x 43.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.4x -3.7x 34.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 -0.02 2.94

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBEEMBLNKETN
Revenue growth (1Y) -20.5% -5.9% 15.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -16.4% 0.8% 10.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -50.0% 12.9% 8.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 92.1% 0.7% 12.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 27.7% 76.3% 8.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.8% 25.7% 15.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 25.9% 77.5% -2.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -39.1% 27.2% 12.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 35.1% 83.3% -2.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -35.4% 44.2% 13.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -214.6% 88.8% 21.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.7% 63.4% 14.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -132.1% 76.6% 20.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.5% 53.2% 13.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBEEMBLNKETN
Gross margin 10.2% 29.7% 35.9%
EBITDA margin -51.9% -43.6% 21.7%
Operating margin -64.9% -53.0% 17.7%
Pretax margin -64.9% -49.8% 16.1%
Net margin -64.5% -52.5% 12.8%
FCF margin -48.9% -13.3% 13.1%
Operating cash flow margin -49.8% -5.9% 16.5%
Return on equity -82.4% -99.5% 19.1%
Return on assets -44.1% -39.7% 6.9%
Return on invested capital – -100.0% 10.3%
Return on capital employed -64.0% -76.4% 12.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.8x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 0.1x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 5.9% 3.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBEEMBLNKETN
Debt / assets 0.4% 0.2% 36.7%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.0x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x 0.8x 3.1x
Debt / FCF 0.0x 0.0x 5.2x
Liabilities / assets 46.9% 60.9% 63.9%
Equity / assets 53.1% 39.1% 36.1%
Interest coverage -861.4x – 12.0x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.2x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.9x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.6x 0.1x
Altman Z-score -5.15 -9.66 3.69

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBEEMBLNKETN
Dividend yield – – 1.1%
Net buyback yield -15.3% – 0.3%
Shareholder yield -15.3% – 1.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBEEMBLNKETN
Forward P/E – – 27.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.72FY2026 $-0.21FY2026 $13.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +15.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +14.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $27.60MFY2026 $90.27MFY2026 $31.83BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -2.3%FY2026 -12.8%FY2026 +16.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.1% +20.4% +21.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBEEMBLNKETN
Held by institutions 9.8% 12.1% 84.7%
Institutions holding 50 113 2,642
Change in shares held, QoQ -14.9% -26.4% +1.6%
Institutions buying 26 37 1,399
Institutions selling 9 27 892
Buyers to sellers 2.89 1.37 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BEEMBLNKETN
BEEM 1.00 0.45 0.35
BLNK 0.45 1.00 0.39
ETN 0.35 0.39 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BEEM, BLNK and ETN?

Eaton (ETN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Beam Global (BEEM) $19.09M, Blink Charging (BLNK) $59.36M, Eaton (ETN) $152.67B.

Which company is growing faster?

Eaton (ETN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Beam Global (BEEM) -20.5%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -5.9%, Eaton (ETN) +15.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Eaton (ETN) has the highest net margin (Beam Global (BEEM) -64.5%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -52.5%, Eaton (ETN) 12.8%). On return on invested capital, Eaton (ETN) leads (Blink Charging (BLNK) -100.0%, Eaton (ETN) 10.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Eaton (ETN) returned the most: Beam Global (BEEM) -69.2%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -79.1%, Eaton (ETN) +1.2%. Over five years, Eaton (ETN) compounded fastest (Beam Global (BEEM) -51.2%/yr, Blink Charging (BLNK) -58.2%/yr, Eaton (ETN) +18.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Eaton (ETN) has been the steadiest (Beam Global (BEEM) 78.8%, Blink Charging (BLNK) 82.3%, Eaton (ETN) 40.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BEEM, BLNK and ETN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Eaton (ETN) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.