BBW vs FNKO vs MAT Stock Comparison

Build-A-Bear Workshop, Funko and Mattel Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BBW Build-A-Bear Workshop Inc
$23.80 -7.6% 1M -57.1% 1Y
Market cap
$303.55M
P/E
5.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$517.75M
Div. yield
0.04%
Specialty Retail Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
FNKO Funko, Inc.
$6.68 +21.5% 1M +103.7% 1Y
Market cap
$367.28M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$932.64M
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
MAT Mattel Inc /De/
$15.82 +19.0% 1M -14.3% 1Y
Market cap
$4.53B
P/E
10.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.49B
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Build-A-Bear Workshop leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Build-A-Bear Workshop 5, Mattel 4, Funko 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBBWFNKOMATLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $303.55M $367.28M $4.53B MAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 5.9x -181.6x 10.6x BBW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.3x 15.2x 12.0x BBW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.9% -3.9% +2.9% MAT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.0% -0.2% 7.8% BBW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.0% 8.3% MAT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.9x 3.0x FNKO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.04% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -57.1% +103.7% -14.3% FNKO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.5%/yr -16.1%/yr -5.2%/yr BBW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.7% 66.7% 45.0% MAT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 61/100 63/100 BBW

Percentile Scorecard

BBWFNKOMAT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBBWFNKOMAT
Valuation 85 #17 of 104 73 #10 of 34 70 #11 of 34
Growth 18 #81 of 99 90 #4 of 32 32 #22 of 32
Profitability 88 #13 of 99 55 #15 of 32 81 #7 of 32
Financial Health 71 #34 of 113 25 #25 of 33 34 #22 of 33
Shareholder Returns 64 #27 of 73 – 100 #1 of 18
Overall 65 61 63
  • BBW ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • FNKO ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • MAT ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBBWFNKOMATSPY
1 month -7.6%+21.5%+19.0% -0.8%
3 months -30.3%+9.2%+6.9% +3.5%
6 months -38.2%+55.0%+7.5% +7.0%
Year to date -61.2%+96.5%-20.3% +12.2%
1 year -57.1%+103.7%-14.3% +13.0%
3 years -2.5%-9.2%-14.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year -0.9%-3.2%-5.0% +23.1%
5 years +57.1%-58.5%-23.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +9.5%-16.1%-5.2% +11.0%
10 years +123.5%—-50.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year +8.4%—-6.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBBWFNKOMATSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.7%66.7%45.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 68.4%57.8%50.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.882.010.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.991.55-0.32 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.2%-90.9%-53.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -66.5%-5.9%-28.6% -1.8%
52-week high $71.03$7.10$22.16 $779.14
52-week low $23.37$2.81$12.66 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBBWFNKOMAT
P/E now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 16.7x -184.5xmedian 17.8x 10.7xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.5x 0.4xmedian 1.1x 0.8xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 9.0x 6.3xmedian 9.3x 10.5xmedian 9.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.1xmedian 16.5x 13.7xmedian 10.4x 8.8xmedian 10.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.7x 2.0xmedian 1.4x 2.3xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.00median 0.72 -2.36median 0.33 0.33median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBBWFNKOMAT
Revenue $517.75M $932.64M $5.49B
Gross profit $293.49M $418.81M $2.61B
Operating income $66.71M $24.91M $429.10M
Net income $51.58M -$1.02M $427.37M
Free cash flow $24.54M $27.24M $512.60M
EPS (diluted) $4.15 $-0.04 $1.48
Cash & equivalents $14.00M $40.71M $523.86M
Total debt – $201.10M $2.33B
Shares (diluted) 12.43M 57.46M 288.93M
Enterprise value $208.81M $210.95M $1.20B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBBWFNKOMAT
P/E 5.7x -184.5x 10.7x
P/FCF 12.1x 13.7x 8.8x
P/Operating cash flow 5.0x 5.9x 6.8x
P/S 0.6x 0.4x 0.8x
P/B 1.9x 2.0x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 6.2x 3.0x
EV/EBITDA 3.4x 6.3x 10.5x
EV/EBIT 4.2x 21.5x 14.8x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 0.6x 1.2x
EV/FCF 11.5x 19.6x 12.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.8x 8.5x 9.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.00 -2.36 0.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBBWFNKOMAT
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.9% -3.9% 2.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.6% -7.8% 2.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.3% 9.3% -4.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.4% 7.0% 4.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -10.9% 161.1% -36.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.5% 29.7% 0.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -12.9% 98.4% -18.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.4% 82.0% 23.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -8.0% 97.1% -8.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 5.7% 78.2% 32.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -11.3% 236.9% -10.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.5% 69.4% 7.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -47.5% 259.8% -13.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.4% 33.7% 5.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBBWFNKOMAT
Gross margin 56.7% 44.9% 47.5%
EBITDA margin 15.9% 9.1% 11.0%
Operating margin 12.9% 2.7% 7.8%
Pretax margin 13.1% 0.5% 8.8%
Net margin 10.0% -0.2% 7.8%
FCF margin 4.7% 2.9% 9.3%
Operating cash flow margin 11.4% 6.7% 12.1%
Return on equity 32.4% -1.1% 20.0%
Return on assets 15.0% -0.3% 6.5%
Return on invested capital – 0.0% 8.3%
Return on capital employed 24.9% 6.2% 8.5%
Asset turnover 1.5x 1.5x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x -61.8x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 1.1% 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBBWFNKOMAT
Debt / assets – 30.8% 36.7%
Debt / equity – 1.1x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.9x 3.0x
Debt / FCF – 7.4x 4.6x
Liabilities / assets 52.4% 71.2% 68.6%
Equity / assets 47.6% 28.8% 31.4%
Interest coverage – – 3.5x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.2x 1.9x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.6x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 3.86 1.72 2.82

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBBWFNKOMAT
Dividend yield 3.8% – –
Net buyback yield 12.7% – 15.1%
Shareholder yield 16.5% – 15.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 22.2% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 46.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.3% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -19.6% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBBWFNKOMAT
Forward P/E 7.3xFY2026 15.2xFY2026 12.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.25FY2026 $0.44FY2026 $1.32FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -18.5%FY2026 – -6.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.6% -27.3% +10.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $533.87MFY2026 $905.55MFY2026 $6.04BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.8%FY2026 -0.3%FY2026 +12.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -6.5% +18.4% -5.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBBWFNKOMAT
Held by institutions 100.0% 83.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding 175 125 405
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.1% -2.1% +1.8%
Institutions buying 91 67 151
Institutions selling 45 40 169
Buyers to sellers 2.02 1.68 0.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BBWFNKOMAT
BBW 1.00 0.22 0.27
FNKO 0.22 1.00 0.31
MAT 0.27 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BBW, FNKO and MAT?

Mattel (MAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) $303.55M, Funko (FNKO) $367.28M, Mattel (MAT) $4.53B.

Which stock is cheaper, BBW, FNKO and MAT?

Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) 5.9x, Funko (FNKO) -181.6x, Mattel (MAT) 10.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) is cheapest (Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) 7.3x, Funko (FNKO) 15.2x, Mattel (MAT) 12.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Mattel (MAT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) -0.9%, Funko (FNKO) -3.9%, Mattel (MAT) +2.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) has the highest net margin (Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) 10.0%, Funko (FNKO) -0.2%, Mattel (MAT) 7.8%). On return on invested capital, Mattel (MAT) leads (Funko (FNKO) 0.0%, Mattel (MAT) 8.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Funko (FNKO) returned the most: Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) -57.1%, Funko (FNKO) +103.7%, Mattel (MAT) -14.3%. Over five years, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) compounded fastest (Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) +9.5%/yr, Funko (FNKO) -16.1%/yr, Mattel (MAT) -5.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) 0.04%, Funko (FNKO) 0.00%, Mattel (MAT) 0.00%. Funko (FNKO) and Mattel (MAT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mattel (MAT) has been the steadiest (Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) 57.7%, Funko (FNKO) 66.7%, Mattel (MAT) 45.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BBW, FNKO and MAT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.