BAH vs BMHL vs BRLT Stock Comparison

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding, Bluemount Holdings and Brilliant Earth Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding 8, Brilliant Earth 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBAHBMHLBRLTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.99B $42.67M $25.58M BAH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.7x 32.3x -5.7x BAH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.4x — 21.6x BAH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -6.2% — +6.4% BRLT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.1% — -1.0% BAH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 17.1% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.6% -8.8% -41.5% BAH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.7%/yr — -34.0%/yr BAH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.1% 70.8% 61.4% BAH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 — 28/100 BAH

Percentile Scorecard

BAHBMHLBRLT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBAHBMHLBRLT
Valuation 74 #30 of 112 7 #104 of 112 41 #27 of 45
Growth 62 #37 of 96 – 5 #41 of 43
Profitability 84 #15 of 91 – 20 #33 of 41
Financial Health 29 #89 of 125 47 #67 of 125 45 #29 of 52
Shareholder Returns 65 #24 of 67 – 30 #24 of 34
Overall 63 – 28
  • BAH ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • BMHL ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • BRLT ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBAHBMHLBRLTSPY
1 month +14.4%-42.3%+10.2% -0.2%
3 months +14.0%-44.8%+33.6% +3.9%
6 months +9.4%-12.7%+7.9% +8.2%
Year to date -1.1%-6.9%-13.7% +12.9%
1 year -3.6%-8.8%-41.5% +12.3%
3 years -28.9%—-43.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year -10.8%—-17.3% +23.3%
5 years +3.6%—-87.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year +0.7%—-34.0% +10.9%
10 years +174.1%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year +10.6%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBAHBMHLBRLTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.1%70.8%61.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.0%80.4%64.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.200.270.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.09-0.12-0.68 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.9%-50.3%-94.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.4%-49.7%-46.1% -1.2%
52-week high $102.23$6.16$2.80 $779.14
52-week low $59.71$3.06$1.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBAHBMHLBRLT
P/E now vs peer median 12.7xmedian 21.2x 32.3xmedian 21.2x -5.5xmedian 16.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.9x 9,741xmedian 0.9x 0.3xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 11.9x —median 11.9x -29.4xmedian 9.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.1xmedian 13.7x -16,129xmedian 13.7x 53.3xmedian 12.0x
P/B now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 2.4x 7,027xmedian 2.4x 2.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.30median 1.00 —median 1.00 0.08median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBAHBMHLBRLT
Revenue $10.98B – $449.28M
Gross profit $5.77B – $253.67M
Operating income $1.02B – -$9.08M
Net income $784.00M – -$9.63M
Free cash flow $984.00M – $2.88M
EPS (diluted) $6.56 – $-0.04
Cash & equivalents $334.00M $939.29 $74.95M
Total debt $4.41B – –
Shares (diluted) 119.59M 25.09M 101.68M
Enterprise value $7.51B $32.16M -$260.45M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBAHBMHLBRLT
P/E 12.7x 32.3x -5.5x
P/FCF 10.1x -16,129x 53.3x
P/Operating cash flow 9.2x – 24.0x
P/S 0.9x 9,741x 0.3x
P/B 8.0x 7,027x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 25.5x 7,027x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 11.7x – -29.4x
EV/EBIT 13.8x – -8.7x
EV/Revenue 1.3x – 0.2x
EV/FCF 14.2x – 27.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.0x – 12.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.30 – 0.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBAHBMHLBRLT
Revenue growth (1Y) -6.2% – 6.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.1% – 0.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -7.8% – 1.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.4% – 1.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -8.0% – -167.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.3% – -38.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -5.1% – -240.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 38.5% – -40.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.5% – -55.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 42.9% – -70.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.2% – -64.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 61.2% – -32.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 20.1% – -77.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 75.1% – -22.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBAHBMHLBRLT
Gross margin 52.5% – 56.5%
EBITDA margin 10.9% – -0.6%
Operating margin 9.3% – -2.0%
Pretax margin 7.9% – 0.6%
Net margin 7.1% – -1.0%
FCF margin 9.0% – 0.6%
Operating cash flow margin 9.8% – 1.4%
Return on equity 64.1% – -13.3%
Return on assets 9.9% – -5.1%
Return on invested capital 17.1% – –
Return on capital employed 17.1% – -8.9%
Asset turnover 1.4x – 2.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x – -0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBAHBMHLBRLT
Debt / assets 53.1% 7,223% –
Debt / equity 3.5x 82.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.4x – –
Debt / FCF 4.5x – –
Liabilities / assets 85.0% 12.7% 62.7%
Equity / assets 15.0% 87.3% 37.3%
Interest coverage – – -33.4x
Current ratio 1.4x – 1.6x
Quick ratio 2.2x – 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x – 0.8x
Altman Z-score 3.35 – 3.16

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBAHBMHLBRLT
Dividend yield 2.8% – –
Net buyback yield 3.4% – 0.1%
Shareholder yield 6.2% – 0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBAHBMHLBRLT
Forward P/E 12.4xFY2026 – 21.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.72FY2026 – $0.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -3.1% – +57.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.71BFY2026 – $433.88MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.4%FY2026 – -0.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.9% – +19.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBAHBMHLBRLT
Held by institutions 96.5% – 4.2%
Institutions holding 557 – 36
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.0% – -4.5%
Institutions buying 283 – 16
Institutions selling 202 – 8
Buyers to sellers 1.40 – 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BAHBMHLBRLT
BAH 1.00 -0.02 0.16
BMHL -0.02 1.00 0.03
BRLT 0.16 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BAH, BMHL and BRLT?

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) $9.99B, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) $42.67M, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) $25.58M.

Which stock is cheaper, BAH, BMHL and BRLT?

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 12.7x, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) 32.3x, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) -5.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) is cheapest (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 12.4x, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) 21.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Brilliant Earth (BRLT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) -6.2%, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) +6.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) has the highest net margin (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 7.1%, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) -1.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) returned the most: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) -3.6%, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) -8.8%, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) -41.5%. Over five years, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) compounded fastest (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) +0.7%/yr, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) -34.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) has been the steadiest (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 42.1%, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) 70.8%, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) 61.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BAH, BMHL and BRLT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.