ATVK vs EOSE vs JZXN Stock Comparison

Globaltek Ventures, Eos Energy Enterprises and Jiuzi Holdings Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Globaltek Ventures leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Globaltek Ventures 6, Eos Energy Enterprises 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATVKEOSEJZXNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.82B $728.87M $1.37M ATVK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 352.1x -0.6x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -95.1% +533.9% — EOSE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13,318.1% -546.5% — ATVK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.2x -1.1x — ATVK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -46.9% -84.8% -89.9% ATVK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.5%/yr -28.3%/yr -86.1%/yr ATVK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 306.3% 120.2% 201.9% EOSE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 30/100 16/100 — ATVK

Percentile Scorecard

ATVKEOSEJZXN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATVKEOSEJZXN
Valuation 55 #29 of 63 8 #58 of 63 –
Growth 10 #54 of 60 24 #46 of 60 –
Profitability 39 #35 of 57 16 #48 of 57 –
Financial Health 14 #62 of 72 28 #52 of 72 87 #10 of 72
Shareholder Returns – 3 #31 of 32 –
Overall 30 16 –
  • ATVK ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • EOSE ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • JZXN ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATVKEOSEJZXNSPY
1 month -40.7%-34.6%-4.4% -1.0%
3 months -9.0%-44.0%-32.3% -0.4%
6 months -69.4%-67.3%+23.9% +4.5%
Year to date -82.2%-81.3%-37.0% +12.4%
1 year -46.9%-84.8%-89.9% +13.6%
3 years +87.3%+8.6%-99.7% +76.4%
3 years, per year +23.3%+2.8%-86.0% +20.8%
5 years +2.7%-81.0%-100.0% +63.7%
5 years, per year +0.5%-28.3%-86.1% +10.4%
10 years -97.9%—— +267.7%
10 years, per year -32.0%—— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureATVKEOSEJZXNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 306.3%120.2%201.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 449.4%125.0%184.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.124.162.16 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.15-0.71-0.45 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.5%-94.6%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -84.8%-88.8%-89.9% -1.6%
52-week high $25.20$19.19$10.76 $779.14
52-week low $3.82$1.62$0.85 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATVKEOSEJZXN
P/E now vs peer median 352.1xmedian 26.4x -0.6xmedian 26.4x —median 26.4x
P/S now vs peer median 53,339xmedian 2.6x 3.4xmedian 2.6x —median 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2,607xmedian 19.6x -3.6xmedian 19.6x —median 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 4,416xmedian 29.9x -1.7xmedian 29.9x —median 29.9x
P/B now vs peer median -1,576xmedian 1.8x -0.7xmedian 1.8x 0.0xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 1.45median 0.71 0.09median 0.71 —median 0.71

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATVKEOSEJZXN
Revenue $34.20K $214.25M –
Gross profit – -$181.57M –
Operating income -$728.67K -$305.61M –
Net income -$775.27K -$528.67M –
Free cash flow $413.05K -$420.19M –
R&D – $35.73M –
EPS (diluted) $0.01 $-3.45 –
Cash & equivalents $29.33K $305.49M $271.07K
Total debt $1.60M $617.12M –
Shares (diluted) 419.75M 339.80M 346.87K
Enterprise value $1.82B -$614.01M -$4.76M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATVKEOSEJZXN
P/E 352.1x -0.6x –
P/FCF 4,416x -1.7x –
P/Operating cash flow 4,416x -2.4x –
P/S 53,339x 3.4x –
P/B -1,576x -0.7x 0.0x
P/Tangible book -1,481x -0.7x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA -2,607x -3.6x –
EV/EBIT -2,505x -3.4x –
EV/Revenue 53,385x 4.9x –
EV/FCF 4,420x -2.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 4,420x -3.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.45 0.09 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATVKEOSEJZXN
Revenue growth (1Y) -95.1% 533.9% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -70.7% 129.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -74.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -21.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -238.8% -37.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -162.8% -18.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) -105.7% 35.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -178.6% -16.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) -23.7% 19.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 242.2% -6.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -69.0% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.1% -18.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -93.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.1% -27.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATVKEOSEJZXN
Gross margin – -84.7% –
EBITDA margin -2,048% -133.3% –
Operating margin -2,131% -142.6% –
Pretax margin -2,267% -246.7% –
Net margin 13,318% -546.5% –
FCF margin 1,208% -196.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 1,208% -143.7% –
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets -152.5% -62.0% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -29.2% -44.0% –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.5x 0.6x –
Stock comp / revenue 3,211% 10.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATVKEOSEJZXN
Debt / assets 150.7% 68.1% –
Debt / equity -1.4x -0.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA -2.2x -1.1x –
Debt / FCF 3.9x -1.5x –
Liabilities / assets 209.0% 213.7% 5.1%
Equity / assets -109.0% -113.7% 94.9%
Interest coverage -15.6x -7.9x –
Current ratio 0.0x 3.3x 17.0x
Quick ratio 0.0x 2.1x 20.9x
Cash ratio 0.0x 1.9x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 482.96 -3.73 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATVKEOSEJZXN
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -78.5% –
Shareholder yield – -78.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATVKEOSEJZXN
EPS, next fiscal year – $-1.29FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $317.26MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +177.8%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +87.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersATVKEOSEJZXN
Held by institutions – 67.1% –
Institutions holding – 351 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +11.3% –
Institutions buying – 214 –
Institutions selling – 101 –
Buyers to sellers – 2.12 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATVKEOSEJZXN
ATVK 1.00 0.01 0.10
EOSE 0.01 1.00 0.12
JZXN 0.10 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ATVK, EOSE and JZXN?

Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) $1.82B, Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) $728.87M, Jiuzi Holdings (JZXN) $1.37M.

Which company is growing faster?

Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) -95.1%, Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) +533.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) has the highest net margin (Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) 13,318.1%, Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) -546.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) returned the most: Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) -46.9%, Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) -84.8%, Jiuzi Holdings (JZXN) -89.9%. Over five years, Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) compounded fastest (Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) +0.5%/yr, Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) -28.3%/yr, Jiuzi Holdings (JZXN) -86.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) has been the steadiest (Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) 306.3%, Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) 120.2%, Jiuzi Holdings (JZXN) 201.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ATVK, EOSE and JZXN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.