ASML vs FORM Stock Comparison

Asml Holding and Formfactor Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,571.80 -9.9% 1M +51.7% 1Y
Market cap
$616.92B
P/E
56.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
5 wins
FORM Formfactor Inc
$98.51 -25.0% 1M +129.9% 1Y
Market cap
$7.89B
P/E
68.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$902.23M
Div. yield
–
Test and Measurement Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Asml Holding leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Asml Holding 5, Formfactor 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionASMLFORMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $616.92B $7.89B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 56.4x 68.4x ASML
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.7x 31.3x FORM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.9% +18.0% ASML
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 29.1% 12.8% ASML
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 9.2% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -2.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +51.7% +129.9% FORM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.4%/yr +21.6%/yr FORM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.8% 87.1% ASML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 66/100 FORM

Percentile Scorecard

ASMLFORM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisASMLFORM
Valuation 18 #78 of 95 29 #80 of 112
Growth 82 #18 of 93 96 #5 of 109
Profitability 78 #21 of 91 76 #26 of 105
Financial Health 13 #89 of 102 91 #11 of 117
Shareholder Returns 36 #49 of 76 40 #50 of 82
Overall 45 66
  • ASML ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • FORM ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodASMLFORMSPY
1 month -9.9%-25.0% -1.0%
3 months -10.5%-5.3% +2.9%
6 months +7.8%-36.5% +6.4%
Year to date +46.9%+76.6% +11.4%
1 year +51.7%+129.9% +13.1%
3 years +161.6%+198.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year +37.8%+44.0% +21.5%
5 years +96.2%+165.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year +14.4%+21.6% +10.9%
10 years +1,393.3%+870.5% +255.2%
10 years, per year +31.0%+25.5% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureASMLFORMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.8%87.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.2%87.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.252.96 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.101.49 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.9%-62.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.0%-38.4% -2.5%
52-week high $1,989.44$159.93 $779.14
52-week low $966.57$42.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleASMLFORM
P/E now vs peer median 55.8xmedian 41.5x 66.6xmedian 31.3x
P/S now vs peer median 16.1xmedian 6.9x 8.5xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 27.3x 48.0xmedian 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 48.4xmedian 35.6x 56.5xmedian 28.3x
P/B now vs peer median 26.3xmedian 4.2x 6.9xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 2.31median 2.31 0.42median 1.15

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsASMLFORM
Revenue $37.62B $902.23M
Gross profit $19.58B $389.11M
Operating income – $115.94M
Net income – $115.47M
Free cash flow – $136.12M
R&D – $120.97M
EPS (diluted) $28.13 $1.45
Cash & equivalents $15.17B $109.76M
Total debt $5.16B $48.82M
Shares (diluted) 388.90M 79.61M
Enterprise value $572.61B $6.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricASMLFORM
P/E 55.8x 66.6x
P/FCF 48.4x 56.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 42.8x
P/S 16.1x 8.5x
P/B 26.3x 6.9x
P/Tangible book 27.0x 7.0x
EV/EBITDA – 48.0x
EV/EBIT – 63.5x
EV/Revenue 15.8x 8.2x
EV/FCF – 54.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – 41.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.31 0.42

Growth

14 metrics
MetricASMLFORM
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.9% 18.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 19.4% 10.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.9% 31.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 19.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 180.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 121.2%
Net income growth (1Y) – 162.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 162.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 35.2% 156.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 24.2% 160.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 71.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 31.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 3,646%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 212.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricASMLFORM
Gross margin 52.0% 43.1%
EBITDA margin – 17.0%
Operating margin – 12.9%
Pretax margin – 14.1%
Net margin 29.1% 12.8%
FCF margin – 15.1%
Operating cash flow margin – 19.9%
Return on equity – 10.2%
Return on assets – 8.5%
Return on invested capital – 9.2%
Return on capital employed – 10.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 4.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricASMLFORM
Debt / assets 8.7% 0.9%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -2.2x
Debt / FCF – 0.1x
Liabilities / assets 61.2% 17.2%
Equity / assets 38.8% 82.8%
Interest coverage – –
Current ratio 1.3x 4.1x
Quick ratio 0.7x 3.1x
Cash ratio 0.5x 2.1x
Altman Z-score – 21.65

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricASMLFORM
Dividend yield 0.6% –
Net buyback yield – -0.1%
Shareholder yield 0.6% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusASMLFORM
Forward P/E 34.7xFY2026 31.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $45.25FY2026 $3.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +53.2%FY2026 +142.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +43.0% +31.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $47.33BFY2026 $982.39MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.3%FY2026 +25.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +41.3% +21.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersASMLFORM
Held by institutions 19.8% 92.0%
Institutions holding 2,488 509
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.0% -3.7%
Institutions buying 1,356 304
Institutions selling 781 168
Buyers to sellers 1.74 1.81

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ASMLFORM
ASML 1.00 0.69
FORM 0.69 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ASML and FORM?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Asml Holding (ASML) $616.92B, Formfactor (FORM) $7.89B.

Which stock is cheaper, ASML and FORM?

Asml Holding (ASML) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Asml Holding (ASML) 56.4x, Formfactor (FORM) 68.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Formfactor (FORM) is cheapest (Asml Holding (ASML) 34.7x, Formfactor (FORM) 31.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Asml Holding (ASML) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%, Formfactor (FORM) +18.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Asml Holding (ASML) has the highest net margin (Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%, Formfactor (FORM) 12.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Formfactor (FORM) returned the most: Asml Holding (ASML) +51.7%, Formfactor (FORM) +129.9%. Over five years, Formfactor (FORM) compounded fastest (Asml Holding (ASML) +14.4%/yr, Formfactor (FORM) +21.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asml Holding (ASML) has been the steadiest (Asml Holding (ASML) 46.8%, Formfactor (FORM) 87.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do ASML and FORM move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.69, a moderate positive relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, ASML and FORM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Asml Holding (ASML) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.