AS vs BIRK vs NKE Stock Comparison

Amer Sports, Birkenstock Holding and Nike Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AS Amer Sports, Inc.
$28.26 +5.0% 1M -10.7% 1Y
Market cap
$15.84B
P/E
29.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.44B
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
BIRK Birkenstock Holding plc
$32.56 +3.3% 1M -24.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.10B
P/E
15.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.64B
Div. yield
–
Footwear Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
NKE NIKE, Inc.
$37.32 +3.5% 1M -46.4% 1Y
Market cap
$56.24B
P/E
18.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$45.89B
Div. yield
0.04%
Footwear Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Birkenstock Holding leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Birkenstock Holding 4, Nike 3, Amer Sports 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionASBIRKNKELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.84B $6.10B $56.24B NKE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.0x 15.6x 18.2x BIRK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.8x 14.0x 30.6x BIRK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +30.5% +19.6% -1.2% AS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.3% 14.8% 6.7% BIRK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.7% 9.7% 13.0% NKE
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 1.3x -0.1x AS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.7% -24.5% -46.4% AS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -25.6%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.8% 52.1% 36.6% NKE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 69/100 43/100 BIRK

Percentile Scorecard

ASBIRKNKE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisASBIRKNKE
Valuation 42 #20 of 34 56 #21 of 46 36 #30 of 46
Growth 100 #1 of 32 81 #9 of 43 12 #38 of 43
Profitability 94 #3 of 32 78 #10 of 42 54 #20 of 42
Financial Health 59 #14 of 33 62 #21 of 53 58 #23 of 53
Shareholder Returns 6 #17 of 18 – 58 #15 of 34
Overall 60 69 43
  • AS ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • BIRK ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • NKE ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodASBIRKNKESPY
1 month +5.0%+3.3%+3.5% -1.0%
3 months -16.6%-19.9%-10.3% +2.9%
6 months -21.1%-17.4%-16.5% +6.4%
Year to date -24.3%-20.4%-41.4% +11.4%
1 year -10.7%-24.5%-46.4% +13.1%
3 years —-16.1%-64.5% +79.4%
3 years, per year —-5.7%-29.2% +21.5%
5 years ——-77.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year ——-25.6% +10.9%
10 years ——-27.9% +255.2%
10 years, per year ——-3.2% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureASBIRKNKESPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.8%52.1%36.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.0%50.0%38.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.501.310.58 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.27-0.47-1.27 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.7%-51.9%-80.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.7%-33.5%-46.4% -2.5%
52-week high $41.96$48.97$69.68 $779.14
52-week low $26.25$30.57$33.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleASBIRKNKE
P/E now vs peer median 28.7xmedian 21.3x 15.5xmedian 15.9x 17.9xmedian 15.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 1.1x 2.3xmedian 0.7x 1.2xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 10.1x 7.9xmedian 9.2x 12.2xmedian 9.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 22.7xmedian 11.4x 15.3xmedian 12.2x 26.3xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.5x 1.9xmedian 2.2x 3.6xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.34 0.50median 0.57 -1.28median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsASBIRKNKE
Revenue $7.44B $2.64B $45.89B
Gross profit $4.45B $1.50B $19.77B
Operating income $956.70M $640.37M $3.76B
Net income $567.80M $391.83M $3.09B
Free cash flow $694.70M $391.32M $2.11B
EPS (diluted) $0.97 $2.10 $2.08
Cash & equivalents $720.40M $792.27M $6.90B
Total debt $147.40M $6.02B $31.94B
Shares (diluted) 563.08M 186.51M 1.48B
Enterprise value $13.43B $4.42B $22.44B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricASBIRKNKE
P/E 28.7x 15.5x 17.9x
P/FCF 22.7x 15.3x 26.3x
P/Operating cash flow 16.4x 12.8x 19.9x
P/S 2.1x 2.3x 1.2x
P/B 2.3x 1.9x 3.6x
P/Tangible book 3.8x 4.3x 3.7x
EV/EBITDA 10.9x 7.9x 12.2x
EV/EBIT 15.9x 11.1x 14.6x
EV/Revenue 2.0x 2.7x 1.2x
EV/FCF 21.9x 18.2x 26.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.8x 15.3x 19.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.50 -1.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricASBIRKNKE
Revenue growth (1Y) 30.5% 19.6% -1.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 20.3% -3.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 37.3% 14.6% 1.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 17.1% -4.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 52.3% 9.6% 9.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 23.5% -13.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 142.9% 16.6% 6.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 31.9% -15.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 117.4% 17.3% 6.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 31.0% -14.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 106.4% 11.1% -21.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -19.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 170.6% -9.0% -30.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -22.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricASBIRKNKE
Gross margin 59.8% 56.9% 43.1%
EBITDA margin 18.8% 34.2% 9.8%
Operating margin 12.9% 24.2% 8.2%
Pretax margin 10.8% 20.0% 8.5%
Net margin 7.3% 14.8% 6.7%
FCF margin 9.3% 14.8% 4.6%
Operating cash flow margin 12.9% 17.7% 6.1%
Return on equity 8.3% 12.0% 20.6%
Return on assets 5.6% 6.3% 8.1%
Return on invested capital 9.7% 9.7% 13.0%
Return on capital employed 11.7% 11.4% 14.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.2x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricASBIRKNKE
Debt / assets 1.4% 30.0% 20.9%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.6x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 1.3x -0.1x
Debt / FCF 0.2x 5.0x 3.7x
Liabilities / assets 32.9% 50.5% 59.7%
Equity / assets 67.1% 49.5% 40.3%
Interest coverage 10.6x 5.7x –
Current ratio 1.8x 3.8x 2.1x
Quick ratio 0.7x 2.0x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.4x 1.4x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 4.02 2.38 3.40

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricASBIRKNKE
Dividend yield – – 4.4%
Net buyback yield -5.5% – -0.4%
Shareholder yield -5.5% – 4.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 78.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 115.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 4.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 5.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusASBIRKNKE
Forward P/E 22.8xFY2026 14.0xFY2026 30.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.24FY2026 $2.33FY2026 $1.22FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +27.8%FY2026 +7.4%FY2026 -41.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +40.3% +25.3% +18.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.73BFY2026 $2.59BFY2026 $40.49BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.7%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026 -12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.5% +10.8% +11.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersASBIRKNKE
Held by institutions 38.1% 90.6% 80.0%
Institutions holding 354 233 1,734
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.1% -2.7% +1.9%
Institutions buying 236 123 797
Institutions selling 87 85 754
Buyers to sellers 2.71 1.45 1.06

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ASBIRKNKE
AS 1.00 0.44 0.30
BIRK 0.44 1.00 0.31
NKE 0.30 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AS, BIRK and NKE?

Nike (NKE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Amer Sports (AS) $15.84B, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) $6.10B, Nike (NKE) $56.24B.

Which stock is cheaper, AS, BIRK and NKE?

Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Amer Sports (AS) 29.0x, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) 15.6x, Nike (NKE) 18.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) is cheapest (Amer Sports (AS) 22.8x, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) 14.0x, Nike (NKE) 30.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Amer Sports (AS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Amer Sports (AS) +30.5%, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) +19.6%, Nike (NKE) -1.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) has the highest net margin (Amer Sports (AS) 7.3%, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) 14.8%, Nike (NKE) 6.7%). On return on invested capital, Nike (NKE) leads (Amer Sports (AS) 9.7%, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) 9.7%, Nike (NKE) 13.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Amer Sports (AS) returned the most: Amer Sports (AS) -10.7%, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) -24.5%, Nike (NKE) -46.4%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Amer Sports (AS) 0.00%, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) 0.00%, Nike (NKE) 0.04%. Amer Sports (AS) and Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nike (NKE) has been the steadiest (Amer Sports (AS) 39.8%, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) 52.1%, Nike (NKE) 36.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AS, BIRK and NKE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Birkenstock Holding (BIRK) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.