AMR vs BTU vs METC Stock Comparison

Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Peabody Energy and Ramaco Resources Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BTU Peabody Energy Corp
$22.88 -13.4% 1M -21.3% 1Y
Market cap
$2.72B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.01B
Div. yield
0.01%
Coal Energy
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Alpha Metallurgical Resources leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Alpha Metallurgical Resources 6, Peabody Energy 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMRBTUMETCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.02B $2.72B $446.63M BTU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -43.9x -14.9x -7.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -12.9% -0.7% -17.7% BTU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.2% -4.6% -12.0% AMR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.9% -4.6% -6.9% AMR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.7x -1.0x 16.8x AMR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +4.9% -21.3% -79.7% AMR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +20.5%/yr +10.1%/yr -12.9%/yr AMR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 56.7% 54.4% 84.3% BTU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 47/100 46/100 AMR

Percentile Scorecard

AMRBTUMETC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMRBTUMETC
Valuation 77 #6 of 23 68 #8 of 23 46 #13 of 23
Growth 35 #14 of 21 25 #16 of 21 15 #18 of 21
Profitability 72 #6 of 19 61 #8 of 19 56 #9 of 19
Financial Health 73 #7 of 23 32 #16 of 23 14 #20 of 23
Shareholder Returns – – 100 #1 of 10
Overall 64 47 46
  • AMR ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • BTU ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • METC ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMRBTUMETCSPY
1 month -9.3%-13.4%-21.1% -1.0%
3 months +14.5%+0.4%-29.3% +2.9%
6 months -12.6%-14.0%-46.9% +6.4%
Year to date -18.1%-23.0%-59.3% +11.4%
1 year +4.9%-21.3%-79.7% +13.1%
3 years -25.0%-7.2%-38.3% +79.4%
3 years, per year -9.2%-2.5%-14.9% +21.5%
5 years +153.9%+61.7%-49.7% +67.7%
5 years, per year +20.5%+10.1%-12.9% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureAMRBTUMETCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 56.7%54.4%84.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 54.1%55.4%91.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.550.391.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.09-0.39-0.95 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.5%-68.3%-86.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.4%-42.1%-79.7% -2.5%
52-week high $249.65$39.50$36.01 $779.14
52-week low $137.33$20.83$7.22 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMRBTUMETC
P/E now vs peer median -45.2xmedian 26.9x -15.3xmedian 26.9x -7.7xmedian 26.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 6.7x 0.7xmedian 6.7x 0.9xmedian 6.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.4xmedian 11.7x 13.5xmedian 11.7x 62.7xmedian 11.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1,429xmedian 10.2x -16.5xmedian 10.2x -4.1xmedian 10.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.2x 0.8xmedian 1.2x 1.2xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.66median 47.24 0.52median 47.24 0.20median 47.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMRBTUMETC
Revenue $2.07B $4.01B $515.42M
Gross profit $206.89M – $69.82M
Operating income -$44.78M -$223.20M -$72.64M
Net income -$46.07M -$172.30M -$61.75M
Free cash flow -$1.45M -$169.00M -$114.19M
EPS (diluted) $-3.62 $-1.50 $-0.96
Cash & equivalents $307.60M $526.30M $282.54M
Total debt $11.40M $339.00M $452.81M
Shares (diluted) 12.71M 122.00M 64.59M
Enterprise value $442.39M $522.59M -$825.31M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMRBTUMETC
P/E -45.2x -15.3x -7.7x
P/FCF -1,429x -16.5x -4.1x
P/Operating cash flow 15.0x 12.6x -11.0x
P/S 1.0x 0.7x 0.9x
P/B 1.4x 0.8x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 0.8x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 14.4x 13.5x 62.7x
EV/EBIT -39.1x -11.7x -8.7x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 0.6x 1.2x
EV/FCF -1,204x -15.4x -5.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.6x 11.7x -15.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.66 0.52 0.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMRBTUMETC
Revenue growth (1Y) -12.9% -0.7% -17.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -15.8% -10.5% -3.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -16.4% – -34.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -44.9% – -28.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -101.5% -245.2% -305.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -26.9% -28.7% -40.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -23.8% -207.9% -211.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -27.0% -28.3% -41.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -27.1% -231.4% -152.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -27.2% -29.3% -38.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -56.9% -64.7% -156.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -51.0% -51.3% -32.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.8% -174.1% -772.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.0% -28.1% -131.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMRBTUMETC
Gross margin 10.0% – 13.5%
EBITDA margin 5.9% 4.8% 2.0%
Operating margin -2.2% -5.6% -14.1%
Pretax margin -3.4% -5.3% -14.8%
Net margin -2.2% -4.6% -12.0%
FCF margin -0.1% -4.2% -22.2%
Operating cash flow margin 6.7% 5.5% -8.2%
Return on equity -3.1% -4.9% -15.2%
Return on assets -2.0% -3.0% -5.8%
Return on invested capital -1.9% -4.6% -6.9%
Return on capital employed -2.2% -4.7% -7.7%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -3.0x -1.3x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.4% 3.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMRBTUMETC
Debt / assets 0.5% 6.2% 44.2%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.1x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.7x -1.0x 16.8x
Debt / FCF -7.8x -2.0x -4.0x
Liabilities / assets 33.6% 39.5% 63.3%
Equity / assets 66.4% 60.5% 36.7%
Interest coverage -13.6x -5.0x -185.8x
Current ratio 3.4x 2.0x 4.2x
Quick ratio 2.2x 1.1x 3.2x
Cash ratio 1.3x 0.7x 2.6x
Altman Z-score 4.11 1.87 1.06

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMRBTUMETC
Dividend yield – 1.2% –
Net buyback yield – – 14.2%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 1.2% 14.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -21.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -21.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -0.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 50.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMRBTUMETC
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.43FY2026 $-0.22FY2026 $-0.91FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.22BFY2026 $4.54BFY2026 $535.80MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.1%FY2026 +17.5%FY2026 -0.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +20.4% +7.6% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMRBTUMETC
Held by institutions 87.7% 91.8% 70.2%
Institutions holding 255 327 200
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.2% -1.6% -5.7%
Institutions buying 115 151 106
Institutions selling 91 129 48
Buyers to sellers 1.26 1.17 2.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMRBTUMETC
AMR 1.00 0.72 0.55
BTU 0.72 1.00 0.53
METC 0.55 0.53 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMR, BTU and METC?

Peabody Energy (BTU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) $2.02B, Peabody Energy (BTU) $2.72B, Ramaco Resources (METC) $446.63M.

Which company is growing faster?

Peabody Energy (BTU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) -12.9%, Peabody Energy (BTU) -0.7%, Ramaco Resources (METC) -17.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) has the highest net margin (Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) -2.2%, Peabody Energy (BTU) -4.6%, Ramaco Resources (METC) -12.0%). On return on invested capital, Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) leads (Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) -1.9%, Peabody Energy (BTU) -4.6%, Ramaco Resources (METC) -6.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) returned the most: Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) +4.9%, Peabody Energy (BTU) -21.3%, Ramaco Resources (METC) -79.7%. Over five years, Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) compounded fastest (Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) +20.5%/yr, Peabody Energy (BTU) +10.1%/yr, Ramaco Resources (METC) -12.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) 0.00%, Peabody Energy (BTU) 0.01%, Ramaco Resources (METC) 0.00%. Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) and Ramaco Resources (METC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Peabody Energy (BTU) has been the steadiest (Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) 56.7%, Peabody Energy (BTU) 54.4%, Ramaco Resources (METC) 84.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMR, BTU and METC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.