AMAT vs LRCX vs ONTO Stock Comparison

Applied Materials, Lam Research and Onto Innovation Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AMAT Applied Materials Inc /De
$377.24 -20.5% 1M +65.1% 1Y
Market cap
$307.82B
P/E
33.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.84B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$230.10 -25.1% 1M +56.0% 1Y
Market cap
$296.82B
P/E
35.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
7 wins
ONTO Onto Innovation Inc.
$198.48 -29.7% 1M +50.4% 1Y
Market cap
$10.04B
P/E
75.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.12B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 7, Applied Materials 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMATLRCXONTOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $307.82B $296.82B $10.04B AMAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.2x 35.1x 75.7x AMAT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.9x 23.1x 23.6x LRCX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.8% +33.4% +8.1% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 30.1% 32.3% 11.8% LRCX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.3% 49.6% — LRCX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x -0.4x — LRCX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +65.1% +56.0% +50.4% AMAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.7%/yr +32.8%/yr +21.7%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.4% 65.6% 72.0% AMAT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 67/100 60/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

AMATLRCXONTO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMATLRCXONTO
Valuation 55 #43 of 95 53 #45 of 95 60 #39 of 95
Growth 49 #48 of 93 85 #15 of 93 33 #63 of 93
Profitability 89 #11 of 91 94 #6 of 91 58 #39 of 91
Financial Health 52 #50 of 102 46 #56 of 102 57 #44 of 102
Shareholder Returns 53 #36 of 76 59 #32 of 76 93 #6 of 76
Overall 60 67 60
  • AMAT ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • LRCX ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • ONTO ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMATLRCXONTOSPY
1 month -20.5%-25.1%-29.7% -1.0%
3 months -29.7%-24.6%-27.1% +2.9%
6 months -9.5%-14.1%-35.5% +6.4%
Year to date +46.8%+34.4%+25.7% +11.4%
1 year +65.1%+56.0%+50.4% +13.1%
3 years +179.6%+281.0%+69.1% +79.4%
3 years, per year +40.9%+56.2%+19.2% +21.5%
5 years +177.5%+313.3%+167.0% +67.7%
5 years, per year +22.7%+32.8%+21.7% +10.9%
10 years +1,226.9%+2,257.6%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +29.5%+37.2%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureAMATLRCXONTOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.4%65.6%72.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.2%65.0%72.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.743.253.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.080.850.70 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -55.4%-56.8%-62.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -47.8%-46.9%-47.6% -2.5%
52-week high $723.00$433.33$378.45 $779.14
52-week low $220.23$139.59$124.09 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMATLRCXONTO
P/E now vs peer median 32.3xmedian 41.5x 34.1xmedian 41.5x 74.0xmedian 41.5x
P/S now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 6.9x 11.0xmedian 6.9x 8.7xmedian 6.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.7xmedian 27.3x 28.0xmedian 27.3x 35.9xmedian 27.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 53.2xmedian 35.6x 44.0xmedian 35.6x 38.5xmedian 35.6x
P/B now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 4.2x 20.7xmedian 4.2x 5.1xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.17median 2.31 1.09median 2.31 -8.40median 2.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMATLRCXONTO
Revenue $30.84B $26.13B $1.12B
Gross profit $15.23B $13.34B $564.06M
Operating income $9.14B $9.65B $134.61M
Net income $9.27B $8.45B $132.61M
Free cash flow $5.62B $6.54B $252.47M
R&D $3.97B $2.47B $142.63M
EPS (diluted) $11.58 $6.73 $2.67
Cash & equivalents $7.04B $7.44B $1.25B
Total debt $26.11B $16.44B –
Shares (diluted) 800.00M 1.26B 49.68M
Enterprise value $273.26B $272.87B $5.88B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMATLRCXONTO
P/E 32.3x 34.1x 74.0x
P/FCF 53.2x 44.0x 38.5x
P/Operating cash flow 35.7x 37.9x 36.6x
P/S 9.7x 11.0x 8.7x
P/B 11.7x 20.7x 5.1x
P/Tangible book 11.8x 20.7x 5.8x
EV/EBITDA 30.7x 28.0x 35.9x
EV/EBIT 32.5x 29.4x 58.3x
EV/Revenue 9.6x 10.9x 7.0x
EV/FCF 52.8x 43.4x 31.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 35.3x 37.4x 29.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.17 1.09 -8.40

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMATLRCXONTO
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.8% 33.4% 8.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.1% 18.2% 7.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.8% 38.1% 5.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.3% 23.4% 5.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.0% 49.3% -29.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.0% 29.0% -8.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 35.6% 45.4% -33.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.9% 28.6% -8.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 36.0% 47.0% -34.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.9% 31.1% -8.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9.0% 18.7% -2.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.6% 15.3% 17.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.4% 17.8% 5.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.0% 13.2% 22.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMATLRCXONTO
Gross margin 49.4% 51.1% 50.4%
EBITDA margin 31.4% 38.7% 19.5%
Operating margin 29.6% 37.0% 12.0%
Pretax margin 34.8% 37.2% 14.1%
Net margin 30.1% 32.3% 11.8%
FCF margin 18.2% 25.0% 22.5%
Operating cash flow margin 27.2% 29.0% 23.8%
Return on equity 37.4% 64.1% 6.5%
Return on assets 22.1% 33.9% 4.4%
Return on invested capital 25.3% 49.6% –
Return on capital employed 29.0% 54.8% 4.8%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.0x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 0.9x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 2.3% 1.5% 2.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMATLRCXONTO
Debt / assets 15.0% 14.2% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x -0.4x –
Debt / FCF 1.2x 0.6x –
Liabilities / assets 41.1% 47.2% 48.0%
Equity / assets 58.9% 52.8% 52.0%
Interest coverage 33.0x – –
Current ratio 2.4x 2.5x 9.7x
Quick ratio 1.6x 1.8x 8.2x
Cash ratio 0.9x 1.0x 6.9x
Altman Z-score 13.82 18.53 4.80

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMATLRCXONTO
Dividend yield 0.5% 0.5% –
Net buyback yield 0.6% 1.3% 2.0%
Shareholder yield 1.2% 1.8% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMATLRCXONTO
Forward P/E 27.9xFY2026 23.1xFY2027 23.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.51FY2026 $9.95FY2027 $8.42FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +43.4%FY2026 +71.0%FY2027 +70.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +32.3% +12.4% +43.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.74BFY2026 $32.59BFY2027 $1.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.4%FY2026 +40.3%FY2027 +35.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +38.0% +24.6% +41.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMATLRCXONTO
Held by institutions 83.6% 85.6% 98.3%
Institutions holding 3,504 3,130 688
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.0% +6.2% +2.3%
Institutions buying 1,789 1,695 376
Institutions selling 1,348 1,162 232
Buyers to sellers 1.33 1.46 1.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMATLRCXONTO
AMAT 1.00 0.91 0.85
LRCX 0.91 1.00 0.83
ONTO 0.85 0.83 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMAT, LRCX and ONTO?

Applied Materials (AMAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Applied Materials (AMAT) $307.82B, Lam Research (LRCX) $296.82B, Onto Innovation (ONTO) $10.04B.

Which stock is cheaper, AMAT, LRCX and ONTO?

Applied Materials (AMAT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Applied Materials (AMAT) 33.2x, Lam Research (LRCX) 35.1x, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 75.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lam Research (LRCX) is cheapest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 27.9x, Lam Research (LRCX) 23.1x, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 23.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Applied Materials (AMAT) +7.8%, Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +8.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lam Research (LRCX) has the highest net margin (Applied Materials (AMAT) 30.1%, Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 11.8%). On return on invested capital, Lam Research (LRCX) leads (Applied Materials (AMAT) 25.3%, Lam Research (LRCX) 49.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Applied Materials (AMAT) returned the most: Applied Materials (AMAT) +65.1%, Lam Research (LRCX) +56.0%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +50.4%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (Applied Materials (AMAT) +22.7%/yr, Lam Research (LRCX) +32.8%/yr, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +21.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Applied Materials (AMAT) has been the steadiest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 60.4%, Lam Research (LRCX) 65.6%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 72.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMAT, LRCX and ONTO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.