AIOT vs MANH Stock Comparison

Powerfleet and Manhattan Associates Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AIOT Powerfleet, Inc.
$2.60 -7.1% 1M -51.8% 1Y
Market cap
$351.52M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$450.45M
Div. yield
–
Supply Chain Software Technology
2 wins
MANH Manhattan Associates Inc
$236.40 +14.7% 1M +21.3% 1Y
Market cap
$13.81B
P/E
65.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.13B
Div. yield
–
Supply Chain Software Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Manhattan Associates leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Manhattan Associates 5, Powerfleet 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAIOTMANHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $351.52M $13.81B MANH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -18.7x 65.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 40.5x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.1% +6.5% AIOT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.2% 18.7% MANH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -51.8% +21.3% MANH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.0%/yr +5.7%/yr MANH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 66.9% 46.5% MANH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 53/100 AIOT

Percentile Scorecard

AIOTMANH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAIOTMANH
Valuation 87 #13 of 90 20 #72 of 90
Growth 96 #4 of 82 48 #43 of 82
Profitability 50 #39 of 77 96 #4 of 77
Financial Health 27 #70 of 96 36 #62 of 96
Shareholder Returns – 64 #20 of 54
Overall 65 53
  • AIOT ranked among 99 companies in Vertical Software
  • MANH ranked among 99 companies in Vertical Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAIOTMANHSPY
1 month -7.1%+14.7% -0.8%
3 months -32.3%+48.4% +3.5%
6 months -18.2%+71.5% +7.0%
Year to date -51.1%+36.4% +12.2%
1 year -51.8%+21.3% +13.0%
3 years +41.3%+25.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +12.2%+7.8% +23.1%
5 years -60.6%+31.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -17.0%+5.7% +11.0%
10 years -50.0%+363.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year -6.7%+16.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAIOTMANHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 66.9%46.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 75.3%46.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.160.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.770.46 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.8%-61.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.0%-2.4% -1.8%
52-week high $5.65$242.17 $779.14
52-week low $2.39$120.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAIOTMANH
P/E now vs peer median -18.6xmedian 42.4x 66.1xmedian 42.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.7x 12.2xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.2xmedian 19.0x 48.4xmedian 19.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 22.1xmedian 19.4x 34.5xmedian 19.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.8x 87.5xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median -0.69median 1.75 4.38median 1.75

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAIOTMANH
Revenue $450.45M $1.13B
Gross profit $251.10M $628.53M
Operating income $21.89M $274.01M
Net income -$18.76M $210.23M
Free cash flow $15.81M $399.19M
R&D $17.86M $147.00M
EPS (diluted) $-0.14 $3.56
Cash & equivalents $32.82M $186.11M
Total debt $278.39M –
Shares (diluted) 134.17M 59.00M
Enterprise value $223.09M $12.81B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAIOTMANH
P/E -18.6x 66.1x
P/FCF 22.1x 34.5x
P/Operating cash flow 10.2x 33.2x
P/S 0.8x 12.2x
P/B 0.7x 87.5x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 87.5x
EV/EBITDA 7.2x 48.4x
EV/EBIT 27.2x 49.6x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 12.1x
EV/FCF 37.6x 34.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.4x 32.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.69 4.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAIOTMANH
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.1% 6.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 50.2% 9.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 27.9% 5.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 55.5% 11.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 204.5% 0.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 71.0% 15.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 61.6% -4.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -132.3% 12.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 61.8% -1.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 27.1% 15.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 16,575% 31.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 94.6% 28.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 206.1% 29.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 145.4% 28.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAIOTMANH
Gross margin 55.7% 55.8%
EBITDA margin 18.3% 24.9%
Operating margin 4.9% 24.3%
Pretax margin -1.8% 25.2%
Net margin -4.2% 18.7%
FCF margin 3.5% 35.4%
Operating cash flow margin 7.6% 36.8%
Return on equity -3.7% 115.9%
Return on assets -1.9% 29.2%
Return on invested capital 2.9% –
Return on capital employed 2.7% 112.1%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.8x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 2.0% 10.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAIOTMANH
Debt / assets 28.9% –
Debt / equity 0.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.0x –
Debt / FCF 17.6x –
Liabilities / assets 49.9% 77.5%
Equity / assets 50.1% 22.5%
Interest coverage 0.8x –
Current ratio 1.1x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 0.66 18.56

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAIOTMANH
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – 3.2%
Shareholder yield – 3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAIOTMANH
Forward P/E – 40.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.06FY2026 $5.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +15.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +11.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $491.24MFY2026 $1.09BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.7%FY2026 +0.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.3% +11.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAIOTMANH
Held by institutions 85.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 181 506
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.5% -0.7%
Institutions buying 106 248
Institutions selling 53 198
Buyers to sellers 2.00 1.25

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AIOTMANH
AIOT 1.00 0.27
MANH 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AIOT and MANH?

Manhattan Associates (MANH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Powerfleet (AIOT) $351.52M, Manhattan Associates (MANH) $13.81B.

Which company is growing faster?

Powerfleet (AIOT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Powerfleet (AIOT) +24.1%, Manhattan Associates (MANH) +6.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Manhattan Associates (MANH) has the highest net margin (Powerfleet (AIOT) -4.2%, Manhattan Associates (MANH) 18.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Manhattan Associates (MANH) returned the most: Powerfleet (AIOT) -51.8%, Manhattan Associates (MANH) +21.3%. Over five years, Manhattan Associates (MANH) compounded fastest (Powerfleet (AIOT) -17.0%/yr, Manhattan Associates (MANH) +5.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Manhattan Associates (MANH) has been the steadiest (Powerfleet (AIOT) 66.9%, Manhattan Associates (MANH) 46.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do AIOT and MANH move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.27, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, AIOT and MANH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Manhattan Associates (MANH) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.