CNTM vs SOUN Stock Comparison

ConnectM Technology Solutions and Soundhound Ai Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SOUN Soundhound Ai, Inc.
$4.24 -29.9% 1M -76.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.71B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$203.20M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Soundhound Ai leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Soundhound Ai 3, ConnectM Technology Solutions 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNTMSOUNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $23.76M $1.71B SOUN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.2x -13.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +23.6% +54.6% SOUN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.3% -67.5% CNTM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -47.1% -76.4% CNTM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 132.4% 68.9% SOUN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 40/100 CNTM

Percentile Scorecard

CNTMSOUN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNTMSOUN
Valuation 84 #11 of 65 28 #47 of 65
Growth 78 #13 of 56 60 #23 of 56
Profitability 63 #20 of 52 35 #34 of 52
Financial Health 18 #57 of 69 68 #23 of 69
Shareholder Returns – 9 #22 of 24
Overall 61 40
  • CNTM ranked among 75 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SOUN ranked among 75 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNTMSOUNSPY
1 month -20.0%-29.9% -0.8%
3 months -25.7%-33.9% +3.5%
6 months -47.2%-48.0% +7.0%
Year to date -68.0%-57.5% +12.2%
1 year -47.1%-76.4% +13.0%
3 years -98.8%+170.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year -77.0%+39.3% +23.1%

Risk

MeasureCNTMSOUNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 132.4%68.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 132.1%64.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.102.98 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.36-1.11 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-93.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.8%-76.9% -1.8%
52-week high $16.00$18.33 $779.14
52-week low $3.90$4.24 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNTMSOUN
P/E now vs peer median 10.2xmedian 50.3x -13.3xmedian 50.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.5x 8.4xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 35.4x -15.5xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 18.0x -12.0xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.5x 3.5xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.38median 1.58 -0.65median 1.58

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNTMSOUN
Revenue $36.02M $203.20M
Gross profit $11.16M $85.94M
Operating income -$12.45M -$139.29M
Net income $2.42M -$137.06M
Free cash flow – -$142.38M
R&D – $101.02M
EPS (diluted) $0.03 $-0.31
Cash & equivalents $2.39M $202.80M
Total debt $56.72M –
Shares (diluted) 72.32M 438.65M
Enterprise value $13.75M $774.07M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNTMSOUN
P/E 10.2x -13.3x
P/FCF – -12.0x
P/Operating cash flow – -14.9x
P/S 0.7x 8.4x
P/B 1.5x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 5.7x
EV/EBITDA – -15.5x
EV/EBIT -3.0x -10.8x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 7.4x
EV/FCF – -10.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – -13.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.38 -0.65

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNTMSOUN
Revenue growth (1Y) 23.6% 54.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 77.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 35.0% 61.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 47.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.9% 42.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -62.4% -12.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 108.3% 39.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.4% -7.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 106.0% 44.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.7% 20.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -2.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -12.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -26.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -20.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNTMSOUN
Gross margin 31.0% 42.3%
EBITDA margin – -47.7%
Operating margin -34.6% -68.5%
Pretax margin -41.0% -64.7%
Net margin 6.3% -67.5%
FCF margin – -70.1%
Operating cash flow margin – -56.4%
Return on equity 27.8% -28.8%
Return on assets 5.4% -20.9%
Return on invested capital – –
Return on capital employed -149.0% -23.8%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue – 38.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNTMSOUN
Debt / assets 31.1% –
Debt / equity 1.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – –
Debt / FCF – –
Liabilities / assets 70.1% 26.6%
Equity / assets 29.9% 73.4%
Interest coverage -7.6x -350.0x
Current ratio 0.2x 3.9x
Quick ratio 0.1x 3.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 2.9x
Altman Z-score -1.86 3.62

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNTMSOUN
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – -10.9%
Shareholder yield – -10.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNTMSOUN
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.87FY2026 $-0.43FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $76.76MFY2026 $225.08MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +114.2%FY2026 +33.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.7% +56.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCNTMSOUN
Held by institutions – 39.0%
Institutions holding – 441
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.7%
Institutions buying – 229
Institutions selling – 121
Buyers to sellers – 1.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNTMSOUN
CNTM 1.00 0.00
SOUN 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNTM and SOUN?

Soundhound Ai (SOUN) is the largest by market capitalisation: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) $23.76M, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) $1.71B.

Which company is growing faster?

Soundhound Ai (SOUN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) +23.6%, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) +54.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) has the highest net margin (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 6.3%, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) -67.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) returned the most: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) -47.1%, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) -76.4%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) has been the steadiest (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 132.4%, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) 68.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do CNTM and SOUN move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.00, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, CNTM and SOUN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.