AGM vs PFSI vs UWMC Stock Comparison

Federal Agricultural Mortgage, PennyMac Financial Services and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.55 +26.0% 1M -73.5% 1Y
Market cap
$516.41M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

PennyMac Financial Services leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (PennyMac Financial Services 5, Federal Agricultural Mortgage 5, UWM Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAGMPFSIUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.20B $3.26B $516.41M PFSI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.0x 8.3x -13.9x PFSI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.5x 13.9x 8.2x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.7% +25.9% +26.1% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 44.9% 17.7% -1.0% AGM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.6% 13.0% 6.3% PFSI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.5x 10.6x PFSI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.04% 0.02% 0.00% AGM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.6% -51.8% -73.5% AGM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.5%/yr +0.6%/yr -25.6%/yr AGM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.0% 52.3% 80.1% AGM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 50/100 36/100 PFSI

Percentile Scorecard

AGMPFSIUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAGMPFSIUWMC
Valuation 29 #120 of 169 40 #102 of 169 20 #136 of 169
Growth 62 #61 of 160 52 #77 of 160 16 #135 of 160
Profitability 70 #45 of 149 48 #78 of 149 32 #102 of 149
Financial Health 8 #146 of 158 47 #84 of 158 18 #130 of 158
Shareholder Returns 52 #66 of 136 62 #53 of 136 95 #8 of 136
Overall 44 50 36
  • AGM ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • PFSI ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAGMPFSIUWMCSPY
1 month -4.5%-2.2%+26.0% -0.2%
3 months -4.1%-25.3%-17.1% +3.9%
6 months +16.7%-29.7%-57.5% +8.2%
Year to date +16.2%-51.4%-64.6% +12.9%
1 year +25.6%-51.8%-73.5% +12.3%
3 years +40.7%-7.9%-68.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +12.1%-2.7%-32.3% +23.3%
5 years +64.9%+3.0%-77.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +10.5%+0.6%-25.6% +10.9%
10 years +389.3%+276.0%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +17.2%+14.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAGMPFSIUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.0%52.3%80.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.7%67.5%89.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.570.821.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.83-0.99-0.92 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.8%-63.8%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.4%-59.8%-74.6% -1.2%
52-week high $241.09$159.46$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $139.00$57.77$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAGMPFSIUWMC
P/E now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 11.1x 8.5xmedian 11.1x -14.1xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 2.6x 1.5xmedian 2.6x 0.7xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.5x 4.6xmedian 13.5x 15.3xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 7.0x -1.8xmedian 7.0x -0.5xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.7x 0.8xmedian 0.7x 2.5xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.14median 0.32 0.62median 0.32 0.28median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAGMPFSIUWMC
Revenue $445.56M $2.21B $3.58B
Net income $229.00M $392.38M -$104.96M
Free cash flow $310.06M -$1.80B -$4.92B
EPS (diluted) $18.38 $7.37 $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $1.04B $214.27M $498.41M
Total debt $34.78B $4.84B $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 10.88M 53.25M 337.53M
Enterprise value -$1.44B $315.61M -$1.78B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAGMPFSIUWMC
P/E 11.1x 8.5x -14.1x
P/FCF 7.1x -1.8x -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow 7.1x -1.9x -0.5x
P/S 5.0x 1.5x 0.7x
P/B 1.2x 0.8x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 1.2x -0.5x -0.6x
EV/EBITDA – 4.6x 15.3x
EV/EBIT 23.1x 4.8x 17.3x
EV/Revenue 80.7x 3.4x 2.2x
EV/FCF 116.0x -4.1x -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 116.0x -4.2x -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.14 0.62 0.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAGMPFSIUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.7% 25.9% 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.7% 15.0% 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 8.6% 1.5% -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 8.5% 14.5% -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 8.2% 2.2% -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 9.7% 13.8% -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 37.4% -11.1% -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -12.5% -16.3% -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 37.5% -11.9% -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -12.5% -16.5% -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAGMPFSIUWMC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 73.6% 14.6%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 62.9% 22.9% -3.2%
Net margin 44.9% 17.7% -1.0%
FCF margin 69.6% -81.4% -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin 69.6% -80.7% -135.9%
Return on equity 12.8% 9.1% -8.1%
Return on assets 0.6% 1.3% -0.6%
Return on invested capital 3.6% 13.0% 6.3%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x -4.6x 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.9% 1.1% 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAGMPFSIUWMC
Debt / assets 88.5% 16.2% 33.5%
Debt / equity 18.8x 1.1x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.5x 10.6x
Debt / FCF 112.2x -2.7x -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 95.3% 85.5% 94.5%
Equity / assets 4.7% 14.5% 5.5%
Interest coverage 1.2x 1.5x 0.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAGMPFSIUWMC
Dividend yield 3.1% 1.9% 19.4%
Net buyback yield -4.1% 1.2% –
Shareholder yield -1.0% 3.0% 19.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 41.2% 16.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 30.4% -3.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 9.4% 1.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 9.6% 6.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAGMPFSIUWMC
Forward P/E 9.5xFY2026 13.9xFY2026 8.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $21.54FY2026 $4.61FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +29.3%FY2026 -50.4%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.3% +125.2% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $449.96MFY2026 $2.30BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.7%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +28.6% +13.3% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAGMPFSIUWMC
Held by institutions 86.3% 64.8% 17.0%
Institutions holding 256 229 290
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.5% -0.5% +31.8%
Institutions buying 148 132 213
Institutions selling 71 66 50
Buyers to sellers 2.08 2.00 4.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AGMPFSIUWMC
AGM 1.00 0.19 0.21
PFSI 0.19 1.00 0.39
UWMC 0.21 0.39 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AGM, PFSI and UWMC?

PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) $2.20B, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) $3.26B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $516.41M.

Which stock is cheaper, AGM, PFSI and UWMC?

PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 11.0x, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 8.3x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -13.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 9.5x, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 13.9x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 8.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) +14.7%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) +25.9%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) has the highest net margin (Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 44.9%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 17.7%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) leads (Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 3.6%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 13.0%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) returned the most: Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) +25.6%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) -51.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.5%. Over five years, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) compounded fastest (Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) +10.5%/yr, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) +0.6%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -25.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) has the highest dividend yield: Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 0.04%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 0.02%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 0.00%. UWM Holdings (UWMC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) has been the steadiest (Federal Agricultural Mortgage (AGM) 31.0%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 52.3%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AGM, PFSI and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.