ADPT vs BLLN vs LH Stock Comparison

Adaptive Biotechnologies, BillionToOne and Labcorp Holdings Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLLN BillionToOne, Inc.
$114.00 -6.3% 1M
Market cap
$5.31B
P/E
176.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$397.41M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Labs Healthcare
3 wins
LH Labcorp Holdings Inc.
$360.45 +16.4% 1M +38.8% 1Y
Market cap
$29.61B
P/E
29.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.59B
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Labs Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Labcorp Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Labcorp Holdings 5, BillionToOne 3, Adaptive Biotechnologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionADPTBLLNLHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.55B $5.31B $29.61B LH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -71.3x 176.7x 29.5x LH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 150.0x 21.1x LH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +50.1% +90.1% +6.0% BLLN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -20.7% 7.6% — BLLN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 7.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -9.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +67.9% — +38.8% ADPT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.2%/yr — +7.9%/yr LH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.8% 94.3% 24.7% LH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 57/100 56/100 BLLN

Percentile Scorecard

ADPTBLLNLH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisADPTBLLNLH
Valuation 14 #79 of 92 21 #73 of 92 56 #41 of 92
Growth 85 #14 of 87 100 #1 of 87 33 #59 of 87
Profitability 24 #66 of 86 61 #34 of 86 71 #26 of 86
Financial Health 66 #34 of 97 96 #5 of 97 57 #42 of 97
Shareholder Returns 26 #41 of 55 7 #51 of 55 65 #20 of 55
Overall 43 57 56
  • ADPT ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • BLLN ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • LH ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodADPTBLLNLHSPY
1 month -0.5%-6.3%+16.4% +0.9%
3 months +25.8%-14.0%+17.3% +5.9%
6 months +109.7%+54.7%+40.2% +8.5%
Year to date +74.7%+39.3%+43.7% +13.3%
1 year +67.9%—+38.8% +12.4%
3 years +567.5%—+81.2% +88.1%
3 years, per year +88.4%—+21.9% +23.5%
5 years -15.1%—+46.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year -3.2%—+7.9% +11.0%
10 years ——+238.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——+13.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureADPTBLLNLHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.8%94.3%24.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.9%107.3%22.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.681.660.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.00—1.57 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.6%-50.8%-35.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.9%-24.0%0.0% -0.9%
52-week high $29.84$149.97$360.45 $779.14
52-week low $12.41$64.03$246.64 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleADPTBLLNLH
P/E now vs peer median -71.0xmedian 25.6x 176.0xmedian 25.6x 29.3xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 14.6xmedian 1.6x 13.4xmedian 1.6x 2.0xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -193.7xmedian 16.3x 97.1xmedian 16.3x —median 16.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -187.8xmedian 21.3x 160.9xmedian 21.3x 21.6xmedian 21.3x
P/B now vs peer median 30.0xmedian 3.3x 9.9xmedian 3.3x 3.3xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median -2.16median 0.68 —median 0.68 1.70median 0.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsADPTBLLNLH
Revenue $308.08M $397.41M $14.59B
Gross profit $232.83M $283.22M $4.23B
Operating income -$37.46M $43.30M $1.50B
Net income -$63.99M $37.71M $1.00B
Free cash flow -$24.03M $33.18M –
R&D $88.21M $59.21M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.40 $0.55 $12.24
Cash & equivalents $169.87M $548.63M $261.80M
Total debt – $91.03M –
Shares (diluted) 159.86M 54.46M 82.00M
Enterprise value $3.55B $3.54B $29.61B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricADPTBLLNLH
P/E -71.0x 176.0x 29.3x
P/FCF -187.8x 160.9x 21.6x
P/Operating cash flow -214.8x 117.7x 16.1x
P/S 14.6x 13.4x 2.0x
P/B 30.0x 9.9x 3.3x
P/Tangible book 30.1x 9.9x 5.7x
EV/EBITDA -193.7x 97.1x –
EV/EBIT -111.3x 112.7x –
EV/Revenue 13.5x 12.3x 2.0x
EV/FCF -173.4x 147.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow -198.4x 107.6x 16.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.16 – 1.70

Growth

14 metrics
MetricADPTBLLNLH
Revenue growth (1Y) 50.1% 90.1% 6.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.6% – 6.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 71.8% 122.4% 8.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 24.2% – 8.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 69.1% 253.2% 12.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 41.8% – 19.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 47.2% 223.2% 17.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 30.5% – 14.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 49.9% 118.7% 19.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 32.9% – 17.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 73.9% – 0.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 48.6% – 9.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 71.0% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 47.9% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricADPTBLLNLH
Gross margin 75.6% 71.3% –
EBITDA margin -7.0% 12.6% –
Operating margin -12.2% 10.9% –
Pretax margin -13.1% 9.5% –
Net margin -20.7% 7.6% –
FCF margin -7.8% 8.3% –
Operating cash flow margin -6.8% 11.4% 12.4%
Return on equity -34.1% 7.2% 11.5%
Return on assets -11.2% 5.3% 5.4%
Return on invested capital – 7.0% –
Return on capital employed -7.7% 6.6% –
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.6x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 1.2x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 15.9% 6.4% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricADPTBLLNLH
Debt / assets – 12.5% –
Debt / equity – 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -9.1x –
Debt / FCF – 2.7x –
Liabilities / assets 76.5% 26.4% 53.2%
Equity / assets 23.5% 73.6% 46.8%
Interest coverage -3.3x 1,056x –
Current ratio 4.8x 11.7x 1.4x
Quick ratio 4.5x 11.2x –
Cash ratio 3.9x 9.8x –
Altman Z-score 3.33 17.85 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricADPTBLLNLH
Dividend yield – – 0.8%
Net buyback yield -0.5% -5.7% –
Shareholder yield -0.5% -5.7% 0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusADPTBLLNLH
Forward P/E – 150.0xFY2026 21.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.57FY2026 $0.76FY2026 $17.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +442.9%FY2026 +3.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +22.4% +9.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $284.03MFY2026 $481.76MFY2026 $14.31BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.5%FY2026 +57.9%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +33.8% +27.1% +11.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersADPTBLLNLH
Held by institutions 97.2% 36.1% 97.0%
Institutions holding 299 155 1,051
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.5% +34.7% +1.6%
Institutions buying 160 127 465
Institutions selling 87 13 393
Buyers to sellers 1.84 9.77 1.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ADPTBLLNLH
ADPT 1.00 0.36 0.26
BLLN 0.36 1.00 0.08
LH 0.26 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ADPT, BLLN and LH?

Labcorp Holdings (LH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Adaptive Biotechnologies (ADPT) $4.55B, BillionToOne (BLLN) $5.31B, Labcorp Holdings (LH) $29.61B.

Which stock is cheaper, ADPT, BLLN and LH?

Labcorp Holdings (LH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Adaptive Biotechnologies (ADPT) -71.3x, BillionToOne (BLLN) 176.7x, Labcorp Holdings (LH) 29.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Labcorp Holdings (LH) is cheapest (BillionToOne (BLLN) 150.0x, Labcorp Holdings (LH) 21.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

BillionToOne (BLLN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Adaptive Biotechnologies (ADPT) +50.1%, BillionToOne (BLLN) +90.1%, Labcorp Holdings (LH) +6.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

BillionToOne (BLLN) has the highest net margin (Adaptive Biotechnologies (ADPT) -20.7%, BillionToOne (BLLN) 7.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Adaptive Biotechnologies (ADPT) returned the most: Adaptive Biotechnologies (ADPT) +67.9%, Labcorp Holdings (LH) +38.8%. Over five years, Labcorp Holdings (LH) compounded fastest (Adaptive Biotechnologies (ADPT) -3.2%/yr, Labcorp Holdings (LH) +7.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Labcorp Holdings (LH) has been the steadiest (Adaptive Biotechnologies (ADPT) 67.8%, BillionToOne (BLLN) 94.3%, Labcorp Holdings (LH) 24.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ADPT, BLLN and LH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Labcorp Holdings (LH) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.