ABG vs GPC vs LAD Stock Comparison

Asbury Automotive, Genuine Parts and Lithia Motors Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ABG Asbury Automotive Group Inc
$195.05 +5.5% 1M -16.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.50B
P/E
7.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.59B
Div. yield
–
Auto Dealerships Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
GPC Genuine Parts Co
$121.78 -6.0% 1M -7.3% 1Y
Market cap
$16.79B
P/E
540.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.33B
Div. yield
3.46%
Auto Parts Retail Consumer Discretionary
6 wins
LAD Lithia Motors Inc
$290.64 -8.1% 1M -9.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.39B
P/E
9.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$38.21B
Div. yield
0.82%
Auto Dealerships Consumer Discretionary

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Genuine Parts leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Genuine Parts 6, Asbury Automotive 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionABGGPCLADLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.50B $16.79B $6.39B GPC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.6x 540.8x 9.1x ABG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.2x 16.9x 8.5x ABG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.3% +5.3% +1.6% GPC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 0.1% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.9x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 3.46% 0.82% GPC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.8% -7.3% -9.7% GPC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.1%/yr -1.5%/yr -1.8%/yr ABG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.9% 34.2% 41.3% GPC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 41/100 36/100 GPC

Percentile Scorecard

ABGGPCLAD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisABGGPCLAD
Valuation 92 #9 of 104 36 #67 of 104 63 #39 of 104
Growth 18 #81 of 99 26 #74 of 99 39 #61 of 99
Profitability – 45 #54 of 98 30 #69 of 98
Financial Health – 28 #81 of 112 29 #80 of 112
Shareholder Returns – 70 #22 of 72 17 #60 of 72
Overall – 41 36
  • ABG ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • GPC ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • LAD ranked among 115 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodABGGPCLADSPY
1 month +5.5%-6.0%-8.1% -0.2%
3 months -19.1%-6.2%-18.9% +3.9%
6 months -2.7%+15.5%+4.8% +8.2%
Year to date -16.1%-1.0%-12.5% +12.9%
1 year -16.8%-7.3%-9.7% +12.3%
3 years +4.6%-4.2%+22.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year +1.5%-1.4%+7.0% +23.3%
5 years -0.5%-7.5%-8.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year -0.1%-1.5%-1.8% +10.9%
10 years +287.4%+36.6%+240.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year +14.5%+3.2%+13.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureABGGPCLADSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.9%34.2%41.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.3%34.6%39.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.630.480.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.45-0.21-0.23 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -47.1%-50.6%-47.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.8%-18.4%-32.0% -1.2%
52-week high $256.03$149.26$427.48 $779.14
52-week low $161.79$92.47$243.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleABGGPCLAD
P/E now vs peer median 7.6xmedian 16.7x 540.8xmedian 16.7x 9.1xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.5x 0.7xmedian 0.5x 0.2xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.0x 14.2xmedian 9.0x —median 9.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 16.5x 22.0xmedian 16.5x -12.6xmedian 16.5x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.7x 3.6xmedian 1.7x 1.0xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median -0.47median 0.72 -7.65median 0.72 —median 0.72

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsABGGPCLAD
Revenue $17.59B $25.33B $38.21B
Gross profit $3.00B $9.40B $5.79B
Operating income $746.30M $912.67M $1.55B
Net income – $31.04M $794.40M
Free cash flow – $762.85M –
EPS (diluted) $25.55 $0.22 –
Cash & equivalents $84.50M $763.15M $374.00M
Total debt – $5.11B –
Shares (diluted) 18.30M 138.33M 22.50M
Enterprise value $3.50B $14.50B $6.39B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricABGGPCLAD
P/E 7.6x 540.8x 9.1x
P/FCF 6.3x 22.0x -12.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 14.0x -78.7x
P/S 0.2x 0.7x 0.2x
P/B 0.9x 3.6x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 5.8x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA – 14.2x –
EV/EBIT – 23.2x –
EV/Revenue 0.2x 0.8x 0.2x
EV/FCF – 27.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 17.7x -78.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.47 -7.65 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricABGGPCLAD
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.3% 5.3% 1.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.2% 3.2% 8.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.8% 5.4% 0.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 4.5% 3.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -23.4% -23.2% -7.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -13.0% -18.3% -3.5%
Net income growth (1Y) – -96.2% -11.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -70.8% -8.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -10.7% -96.1% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -16.2% -70.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 79.8% -127.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -2.8% 33.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 471.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -3.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricABGGPCLAD
Gross margin – 37.1% –
EBITDA margin – 5.9% –
Operating margin – 3.6% –
Pretax margin – 0.0% –
Net margin – 0.1% –
FCF margin – 3.0% –
Operating cash flow margin – 4.7% -0.2%
Return on equity – 0.7% 12.2%
Return on assets – 0.1% 3.0%
Return on invested capital – 0.0% –
Return on capital employed – 7.7% –
Asset turnover – 1.2x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 38.6x -0.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricABGGPCLAD
Debt / assets – 23.8% –
Debt / equity – 1.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.9x –
Debt / FCF – 6.7x –
Liabilities / assets – 78.3% 75.3%
Equity / assets – 21.7% 24.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.9x 1.2x 1.0x
Quick ratio – 0.4x –
Cash ratio – 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – 2.34 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricABGGPCLAD
Dividend yield – 3.5% 0.8%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 3.5% 0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusABGGPCLAD
Forward P/E 7.2xFY2026 16.9xFY2026 8.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $26.97FY2026 $7.22FY2026 $34.04FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -4.0%FY2026 -2.0%FY2026 +1.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.9% +7.2% +15.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.40BFY2026 $24.09BFY2026 $37.52BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -8.9%FY2026 -0.9%FY2026 -0.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.7% +7.4% +8.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersABGGPCLAD
Held by institutions 100.0% 95.5% 100.0%
Institutions holding 315 1,080 445
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.4% +9.5% +0.2%
Institutions buying 173 492 223
Institutions selling 106 417 160
Buyers to sellers 1.63 1.18 1.39

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ABGGPCLAD
ABG 1.00 0.35 0.70
GPC 0.35 1.00 0.30
LAD 0.70 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ABG, GPC and LAD?

Genuine Parts (GPC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Asbury Automotive (ABG) $3.50B, Genuine Parts (GPC) $16.79B, Lithia Motors (LAD) $6.39B.

Which stock is cheaper, ABG, GPC and LAD?

Asbury Automotive (ABG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Asbury Automotive (ABG) 7.6x, Genuine Parts (GPC) 540.8x, Lithia Motors (LAD) 9.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Asbury Automotive (ABG) is cheapest (Asbury Automotive (ABG) 7.2x, Genuine Parts (GPC) 16.9x, Lithia Motors (LAD) 8.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Genuine Parts (GPC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Asbury Automotive (ABG) -1.3%, Genuine Parts (GPC) +5.3%, Lithia Motors (LAD) +1.6%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Genuine Parts (GPC) returned the most: Asbury Automotive (ABG) -16.8%, Genuine Parts (GPC) -7.3%, Lithia Motors (LAD) -9.7%. Over five years, Asbury Automotive (ABG) compounded fastest (Asbury Automotive (ABG) -0.1%/yr, Genuine Parts (GPC) -1.5%/yr, Lithia Motors (LAD) -1.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Genuine Parts (GPC) has the highest dividend yield: Asbury Automotive (ABG) 0.00%, Genuine Parts (GPC) 3.46%, Lithia Motors (LAD) 0.82%. Asbury Automotive (ABG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Genuine Parts (GPC) has been the steadiest (Asbury Automotive (ABG) 36.9%, Genuine Parts (GPC) 34.2%, Lithia Motors (LAD) 41.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ABG, GPC and LAD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Genuine Parts (GPC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.